In the past few days I have been test-driving Twitter’sStorm project, which is a distributed real-time data processing platform. One of my findings so far has been that the quality of Storm’s
documentation and example code is pretty good – it is very easy to get up and running with Storm. Big props to the Storm developers! At the same time, I found the sections on how a Storm topology runs in a cluster not perfectly clear, and learned that the
recent releases of Storm changed some of its behavior in a way that is not yet fully reflected in the Storm wiki and in the API docs.
In this article I want to share my own understanding of the parallelism of a Storm topology after reading the documentation and writing some first prototype code. More specifically, I describe the relationships of worker processes, executors (threads) and tasks,
and how you can configure them according to your needs. This article is based on Storm release 0.8.1, the latest version as of October 2012.
What is Storm?
For those readers unfamiliar with Storm here is a brief description taken from its homepage:
Storm is a free and open source distributed realtime computation system. Storm makes it easy to reliably process unbounded streams of data, doing for realtime processing what Hadoop did for batch processing. Storm is simple, can be used with any programming
language, and is a lot of fun to use!
Storm has many use cases: realtime analytics, online machine learning, continuous computation, distributed RPC, ETL, and more. Storm is fast: a benchmark clocked it at over a million tuples processed per second per node. It is scalable, fault-tolerant, guarantees
your data will be processed, and is easy to set up and operate.
What makes a running topology: worker processes, executors and tasks
Storm distinguishes between the following three main entities that are used to actually run a topology in a Storm cluster:
Here is a simple illustration of their relationships:
Figure 1: The relationships of worker processes, executors (threads) and tasks in Storm
A worker process executes a subset of a topology, and runs in
its own JVM. A worker process belongs to a specific topology and may run one or more executors for one or more components (spouts or bolts) of this topology. A running topology consists of many such processes running on many machines within a Storm cluster.
An executor is a thread that is spawned by a worker process
and runs within the worker’s JVM. An executor may run one or more tasks for the same component (spout or bolt). An executor always has one thread that it uses for all of its tasks, which means that tasks run serially on an executor.
A task performs the actual data processing and is run within
its parent executor’s thread of execution. Each spout or bolt that you implement in your code executes as many tasks across the cluster. The number of tasks for a component is always the same throughout the lifetime of a topology, but the number of executors
(threads) for a component can change over time. This means that the following condition holds true:
<= #tasks. By default, the number of tasks is set to be the same as the number of executors, i.e. Storm will run one task per thread (which is usually what you want anyways).
Also be aware that:
The number of executor threads can be changed after the topology has been started (see
rebalance command below).
The number of tasks of a topology is static.
See Understanding the Internal Message Buffers of Storm for another view on the various threads that are running within the lifetime
of a worker process and its associated executors and tasks.
Configuring the parallelism of a topology
Note that in Storm’s terminology “parallelism” is specifically used to describe the so-calledparallelism
hint, which means the initial number of executors (threads) of a component. In this article though I use the term “parallelism” in a more general sense to describe how you can configure not only the number of executors but also the number of worker
processes and the number of tasks of a Storm topology. I will specifically call out when “parallelism” is used in the narrow definition of Storm.
The following table gives an overview of the various configuration options and how to set them in your code. There is more than one way of setting these options though, and the table lists only some of them. Storm currently has the following order
of precedence for configuration settings: external component-specific configuration > internal component-specific configuration > topology-specific configuration >
Please take a look at the Storm documentation for more details.
Here is an example code snippet to show these settings in practice:
Configuring the parallelism of a Storm bolt
topologyBuilder.setBolt("green-bolt", new GreenBolt(), 2)
In the above code we configured Storm to run the bolt
an initial number of two executors and four associated tasks. Storm will run two tasks per executor (thread). If you do not explicitly configure the number of tasks, Storm will run by default one task per executor.
Configuring parallelism on multi-tenant Storm clusters
Storm 0.8.2 introduced the Isolation Scheduler that makes it easy and safe to share a cluster among many topologies, i.e. it solves the multi-tenancy problem —
avoiding resource contention between topologies — by providing full isolation between topologies.
When you use the isolation scheduler Nathan recommends you set num workers to a multiple of number of machines. And parallelism hint to a multiple of the number of workers. If you do call setNumTasks() (which most people don’t), you should set that to a multiple
of the parallelism hint. If you do this, then what happens is your workload is uniform distributed. Each machine and jvm process will have the same number of threads, and roughly the same amount of work.
Jason Jackson on storm-user grokbase.com/t/gg/storm-user/…
Example of a running topology
The following illustration shows how a simple topology would look like in operation. The topology consists of three components: one spout called
two bolts called
The components are linked such that
its output to
which in turns sends its own output to
Figure 2: Example of a running topology
configured as per the code snippet above whereas
set the parallelism hint (number of executors). Here is the relevant code:
Configuring the parallelism of a simple Storm topology
Config conf = new Config();
conf.setNumWorkers(2); // use two worker processes
topologyBuilder.setSpout("blue-spout", new BlueSpout(), 2); // parallelism hint
topologyBuilder.setBolt("green-bolt", new GreenBolt(), 2)
topologyBuilder.setBolt("yellow-bolt", new YellowBolt(), 6)
And of course Storm comes with additional configuration settings to control the parallelism of a topology, including:
TOPOLOGY_MAX_TASK_PARALLELISM: This setting puts a ceiling on the number of executors that can be spawned for a single
component. It is typically used during testing to limit the number of threads spawned when running a topology in local mode. You can set this option via e.g. Config#setMaxTaskParallelism().
Update Oct 18: Nathan Marz informed me that
be removed in a future release. I have therefore removed its entry from the configuration list above.
How to change the parallelism of a running topology
A nifty feature of Storm is that you can increase or decrease the number of worker processes and/or executors without being required to restart the cluster or the topology. The act of doing so is called rebalancing.
You have two options to rebalance a topology:
Use the Storm web UI to rebalance the topology.
Use the CLI tool storm
rebalance as described below.
Here is an example of using the CLI tool:
# Reconfigure the topology "mytopology" to use 5 worker processes,
# the spout "blue-spout" to use 3 executors and
# the bolt "yellow-bolt" to use 10 executors.
$ storm rebalance mytopology -n 5 -e blue-spout=3 -e yellow-bolt=10
References for this article
To compile this article (and to write my related test code) I used information primarily from the following sources:
My personal impression is that Storm is a very promising tool. On the one hand I like its clean and elegant design, and on the other hand I loved to find out that a young open source tool can still have an excellent documentation. In this article I tried to
summarize my own understanding of the parallelism of topologies, which may or may not be 100% correct – feel free to let me know if there are any mistakes in the description above!