<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>猛禽的编程艺术 - </title><link>category/50183.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>zh-CN</dc:language><lastUpdateTime>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:51:19 GMT</lastUpdateTime><ttl>60</ttl><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>单元测试的规划</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/06/12/2538405.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/06/12/2538405.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/2538405.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/06/12/2538405.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/2538405.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=2538405</trackback:ping><description>如果减少了测试的代码量，如何保证覆盖范围足够大？答案是把粒度放得粗一些。但总的来说，还是不推荐将测试粒度放得太粗，因为这将失去单元测试的一个很大方面的作用，增加DEBUG的工作量。但是同样不应该将粒度做得太细，这样测试就没有意义了。&lt;img src ="aggbug/2538405.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>分布式版本控制（完）</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/03/13/2177207.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/03/13/2177207.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/2177207.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/03/13/2177207.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/2177207.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=2177207</trackback:ping><description>本篇作一个简单的总结。&lt;img src ="aggbug/2177207.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>分布式版本控制（三）</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/03/07/2155655.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/03/07/2155655.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/2155655.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/03/07/2155655.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/2155655.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=2155655</trackback:ping><description>比较详细地介绍了一下Mercurial的使用。&lt;img src ="aggbug/2155655.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>分布式版本控制（二）</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/03/04/2145492.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/03/04/2145492.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/2145492.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/03/04/2145492.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/2145492.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=2145492</trackback:ping><description>本篇介绍Bazaar&lt;img src ="aggbug/2145492.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>分布式版本控制（一）</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/02/29/2133797.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/02/29/2133797.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/2133797.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2008/02/29/2133797.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/2133797.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=2133797</trackback:ping><description>所谓DRCS是相对于传统集中式的SCM而言的。对于传统SCM来说，Repository是集中在唯一的一个地方，所有的用户进行commit或update以及其它的相关操作基本上都需要能够直接连接到这个Repository才能进行。这就会存在一些比较麻烦的问题&lt;img src ="aggbug/2133797.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>GCC的BUG研究(Rev.3)</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/11/19/1893079.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/11/19/1893079.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/1893079.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/11/19/1893079.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1893079.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1893079</trackback:ping><description>是GCC优化上的问题。GCC将 abs() 优化为一个操作，并且对其作了Const Foldering优化，而这种优化对非线性函数来说是错误的。&lt;img src ="aggbug/1893079.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>不用模式的理由</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/09/20/1793030.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/09/20/1793030.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/1793030.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/09/20/1793030.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1793030.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1793030</trackback:ping><description>我认为，模式绝对是个好东西，但不是绝对的好东西。&lt;img src ="aggbug/1793030.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>最恨你们这些做Spyware的</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/03/16/1531270.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/03/16/1531270.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/1531270.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/03/16/1531270.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1531270.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1531270</trackback:ping><description>强烈B4所有编写病毒和spyware的家伙，都是程序员的耻辱&lt;img src ="aggbug/1531270.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>人人都需要一台服务器</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/03/05/1520720.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/03/05/1520720.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/1520720.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/03/05/1520720.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1520720.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1520720</trackback:ping><description>其实需要服务器的人并不是只有我们这样搞技术的，我相信以后每个人——至少每个家庭都需要一台服务器，作为家庭的信息中心。&lt;img src ="aggbug/1520720.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>Web Desktop App（修订版）</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/03/05/1520711.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/03/05/1520711.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/1520711.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/03/05/1520711.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1520711.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1520711</trackback:ping><description>以独立运行的WebServer应用辅以Ajax Web UI实现传统Desktop应用的功能。&lt;img src ="aggbug/1520711.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>语言的缺陷</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/01/16/1484468.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/01/16/1484468.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/1484468.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/01/16/1484468.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>20</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1484468.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1484468</trackback:ping><description>其实原生语言、VM语言、动态语言……各有各的用处，最关键的是要懂得在什么情况下用什么语言。&lt;img src ="aggbug/1484468.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>TDD的误解</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/09/05/1179216.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/09/05/1179216.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/1179216.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/09/05/1179216.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1179216.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1179216</trackback:ping><description>回应《都在说TDD开发,那到底TDD是什么?》一文&lt;img src ="aggbug/1179216.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>两种不同的Web应用</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/01/17/581946.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/01/17/581946.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/581946.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/01/17/581946.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/581946.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=581946</trackback:ping><description>Web应用主要有两种：企业应用和互联网应用。二者是很不同的。&lt;img src ="aggbug/581946.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>SVN+HTTP的一个ulgy的错误</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/01/11/575942.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/01/11/575942.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/575942.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/01/11/575942.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/575942.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=575942</trackback:ping><description>是因为定制404错误页面引起的。&lt;img src ="aggbug/575942.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>猛禽</dc:creator><title>在VMWare中运行FreeBSD时的时钟同步问题</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/01/10/575258.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/01/10/575258.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/575258.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/01/10/575258.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/575258.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=575258</trackback:ping><description>VMWare FreeBSD 时钟同步&lt;img src ="aggbug/575258.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>