http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/category/9476.aspxzh-CNMon, 31 Mar 2008 09:46:00 GMT60猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/09/17/1788483.aspxMon, 17 Sep 2007 17:00:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/09/17/1788483.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/1788483.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/09/17/1788483.aspx#Feedback4http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/1788483.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1788483语言本身主要是一个技术问题，而语言的应用则需要面对更多技术以外的问题。<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/1788483.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/09/12/1782940.aspxWed, 12 Sep 2007 23:32:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/09/12/1782940.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/1782940.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/09/12/1782940.aspx#Feedback50http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/1782940.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1782940C++不是万能的，也没必要做到万能，的确有很多时候用C会更合适。<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/1782940.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/04/21/1573757.aspxSat, 21 Apr 2007 15:27:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/04/21/1573757.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/1573757.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/04/21/1573757.aspx#Feedback10http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/1573757.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1573757事实上与开源相关的有三个方面：商业软件（Business Software）、自由软件（Free Software）和开源软件（Open Source Software，此处为狭义的开源，以下简称OSS）。它们之间的根本区别并不是在是否收费上——这是国内对开源的最大误解。最后还要说一点：不要把开源软件与盗版混为一谈。<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/1573757.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/01/10/1478831.aspxWed, 10 Jan 2007 10:53:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/01/10/1478831.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/1478831.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2007/01/10/1478831.aspx#Feedback54http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/1478831.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1478831其实任何语言都没有什么好跟不好，只有适用不适用<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/1478831.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/12/20/1450270.aspxWed, 20 Dec 2006 11:48:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/12/20/1450270.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/1450270.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/12/20/1450270.aspx#Feedback25http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/1450270.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1450270我当然谈开源，主打便是FreeBSD/Linux、PostgreSQL、Python/Ruby等，顺道批判了一下RAD／IDE。<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/1450270.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/12/06/1431731.aspxWed, 06 Dec 2006 10:49:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/12/06/1431731.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/1431731.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/12/06/1431731.aspx#Feedback1http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/1431731.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1431731我是不太同意孟言的观点，情绪固然有一定的影响，但更多地还是应该归结于市场的选择。<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/1431731.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/10/20/1342120.aspxFri, 20 Oct 2006 09:26:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/10/20/1342120.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/1342120.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/10/20/1342120.aspx#Feedback20http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/1342120.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1342120龙芯想要有更好的未来，还是需要有一个标准的硬件平台，并且支持通用的Linux<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/1342120.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/10/11/1329801.aspxWed, 11 Oct 2006 10:39:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/10/11/1329801.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/1329801.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/10/11/1329801.aspx#Feedback16http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/1329801.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1329801要商业化，就学习Bill.Gates，要理想化，就学习Richard.Stallman。<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/1329801.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/07/28/994786.aspxFri, 28 Jul 2006 20:51:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/07/28/994786.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/994786.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/07/28/994786.aspx#Feedback1http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/994786.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=994786我从不否认这个世界需要商业软件，但同样需要OSS／FS，它们存在对于用户来说只会是好事，至少是增加了额外的选项。目前商业软件及某些大公司的粉丝对OSS／FS的心态很成问题，就EricLee文中举的例子，根本就是OSS／FS在改变商业软件的格局，而不是相反。<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/994786.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/05/13/727299.aspxSat, 13 May 2006 15:06:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/05/13/727299.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/727299.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2006/05/13/727299.aspx#Feedback19http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/727299.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=727299一个管理者如果对自己所管理的内容不了解，他就不可能管理得好。作为身居高位的管理者，如果连应该承担的责任都要推卸，他们还能胜任什么事情呢？<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/727299.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/12/16/554140.aspxFri, 16 Dec 2005 17:39:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/12/16/554140.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/554140.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/12/16/554140.aspx#Feedback3http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/554140.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=554140相对于设计先行的传统理论，我更喜欢测试先行的敏捷方法<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/554140.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/11/01/520697.aspxTue, 01 Nov 2005 16:27:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/11/01/520697.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/520697.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/11/01/520697.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/520697.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=520697Coding即Designing。Designing存在于Coding中。<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/520697.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/10/17/505267.aspxMon, 17 Oct 2005 10:14:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/10/17/505267.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/505267.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/10/17/505267.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/505267.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=505267两问题的症结其实是一样的：就是用户对自己的目标不明确。<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/505267.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/07/23/432784.aspxSat, 23 Jul 2005 15:21:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/07/23/432784.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/432784.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/07/23/432784.aspx#Feedback2http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/432784.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=432784各方的目标差异是客观存在的，我们所能做的只是尽量缩小，而无法完全消除<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/432784.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />猛禽http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/07/11/421046.aspxMon, 11 Jul 2005 16:51:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/07/11/421046.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/421046.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/raptor/archive/2005/07/11/421046.aspx#Feedback1http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/comments/commentRss/421046.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=421046简单设想一下关于Daily Building如何操作的问题<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/raptor/aggbug/421046.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />