http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/category/174484.aspxzh-CNThu, 21 Feb 2008 15:15:00 GMT60NoSoundhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2007/03/29/1545970.aspxThu, 29 Mar 2007 23:44:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2007/03/29/1545970.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/1545970.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2007/03/29/1545970.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/1545970.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1545970Some positive integers n have the property that the sum [ n + reverse(n) ] consists entirely of odd (decimal) digits. For instance, 36 + 63 = 99 and 409 + 904 = 1313. We will call such numbers reversible; so 36, 63, 409, and 904 are reversible. Leading zeroes are not allowed in either n or reverse(n).<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/1545970.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />NoSoundhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/12/05/1430405.aspxTue, 05 Dec 2006 09:27:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/12/05/1430405.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/1430405.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/12/05/1430405.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/1430405.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1430405还等什么，西天取经去<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/1430405.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />NoSoundhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/11/17/1389812.aspxFri, 17 Nov 2006 10:38:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/11/17/1389812.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/1389812.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/11/17/1389812.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/1389812.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1389812将男生PS成女生……<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/1389812.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />NoSoundhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/11/10/1377635.aspxFri, 10 Nov 2006 15:13:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/11/10/1377635.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/1377635.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/11/10/1377635.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/1377635.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1377635所谓原因，就是结果的一个充分条件组中的一个必要组成部分<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/1377635.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />NoSoundhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/11/10/1377628.aspxFri, 10 Nov 2006 15:07:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/11/10/1377628.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/1377628.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/11/10/1377628.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/1377628.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1377628当你有两个处于竞争地位的理论能得出同样的结论，那么简单的那个更好。<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/1377628.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />NoSoundhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/09/21/1261736.aspxThu, 21 Sep 2006 17:38:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/09/21/1261736.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/1261736.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/09/21/1261736.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/1261736.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1261736刚刚好象新网挂掉了，主页也进不去，域名解析服务也不正常，全国可有20%的域名是放在新网的哦。不知道什么时候可以恢复。 <img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/1261736.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />NoSoundhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/09/19/1249261.aspxTue, 19 Sep 2006 20:36:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/09/19/1249261.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/1249261.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/09/19/1249261.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/1249261.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1249261今天的专家头条： 未来几年动态语言谁将成为主流，开篇第一句：“什么是动态语言呢？，可以简单的理解为直接被解释执行的语言称为动态语言。而需要编译环境将程序转换为其它的编码再执行的语言称为静态语言。” 这一句让人失去了再看下去的欲望。<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/1249261.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />NoSoundhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/08/31/1151331.aspxThu, 31 Aug 2006 20:36:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/08/31/1151331.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/1151331.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/08/31/1151331.aspx#Feedback3http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/1151331.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1151331忽悠吧<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/1151331.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />NoSoundhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/07/27/988621.aspxThu, 27 Jul 2006 22:19:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/07/27/988621.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/988621.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/07/27/988621.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/988621.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=988621BS不择手段的家伙<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/988621.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />NoSoundhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/07/13/916626.aspxThu, 13 Jul 2006 22:32:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/07/13/916626.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/916626.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/07/13/916626.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/916626.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=916626所谓“大幅度提高”这一词，但这只不过是一种想象而已，以为第二条语句会比第一条语句来得快，那就太低估现代数据库对SQL语句的优化能力了。 其实，这两条SQL 语句在MSSQL里会被优化为以同样的方式来执行，以NorthWind数据库为例，两条SQL语句执行方式和结果完全一样。 同时，从易读性而言，显然，第一条要优于第二条<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/916626.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />NoSoundhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/06/02/770341.aspxFri, 02 Jun 2006 22:46:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/06/02/770341.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/770341.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/06/02/770341.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/770341.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=770341好象，我们天生就应该在管理员帐号下做事，从来没有仔细想想，为什么Windows会划分出不同权限的帐号，也没有想想，用Office录入一些文档、用记事本写几行留言，玩玩游戏，上网聊聊天、浏览几个网站……这些普普通通的日常操作，凭什么就必须要求管理员权限呢？…… 如果我们设计一个基于MSSQL的数据库应用系统，我们可以告诉客户”该程序必须以SA权限登录到数据库“吗？如果不是，那么，为什么我们的程序，就非得在管理员帐号下，才能正常运转呢？……<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/770341.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />SeaWave(NoSound)http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/06/01/768320.aspxThu, 01 Jun 2006 17:49:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/06/01/768320.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/768320.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/06/01/768320.aspx#Feedback2http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/768320.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=768320观云风《对象和资源的管理》有不同意见：文中没有任何证据证明用另一个线程来回收资源比引用计数好，而且对C++方便的语法也有不当批评……<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/768320.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />SeaWave(NoSound)http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/05/26/755982.aspxFri, 26 May 2006 10:29:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/05/26/755982.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/755982.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/05/26/755982.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/755982.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=755982这些炮轰不但没有证据，甚至连罪名本身都含糊不清。“COM违反了哪几条基本原”？可以凭“估计”就认定是COM惹的祸？COM是一种设计模式吗？哪一种？就算是，它被“滥用”的例子为什么不举一两个出来……<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/755982.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />SeaWave(NoSound)http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/05/22/749108.aspxMon, 22 May 2006 12:10:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/05/22/749108.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/749108.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/05/22/749108.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/749108.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=749108力求精确是很好的做法，但如果很多词汇已植根大家心中，不妨就沿袭下来，没必要再死抠字面意思、强行制订一套新的标准了。<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/749108.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />SeaWave(NoSound)http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/05/21/747723.aspxSun, 21 May 2006 13:08:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/05/21/747723.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/747723.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/seawave/archive/2006/05/21/747723.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/comments/commentRss/747723.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=747723这种语法特性真的很古怪……<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/seawave/aggbug/747723.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />