上面我们展现了反编译技术对混淆过后代码的比较,我们清楚的看到了三个工具的强大性.从C#的反编译结果上来说,无疑MaxtoCode是最优秀的,它已经完全的杜绝你的源代码外泄.
但C#只是一种高级语言,我们希望更底层一点,希望读到更深层的代码MSIL,那么,现在让我们来用各种工具取得它的MSIL代码吧.
源文件的MSIL代码如下:
.method private instance
string Encrypt(
string inStr) cil managed
{
// Code Size: 84 byte(s)
.maxstack 5
.locals (
L_0000: nop
L_0001: ldstr "a#2151336fdaghksfges"
L_0006: stloc.3
L_0007: ldarg.1
L_000d: stloc.1
L_000e: ldc.i4.0
L_000f: stloc.s num3
L_0011: ldc.i4.0
L_0012: ldloc.1
L_0013: ldc.i4.1
L_0014: sub.ovf
L_0015: stloc.s num4
L_0017: stloc.2
L_0018: br.s L_0048
L_001a: ldloc.s text3
L_001c: ldarg.1
L_001d: ldloc.2
L_001e: ldc.i4.1
L_0024: ldloc.3
L_0025: ldloc.s num3
L_0027: ldc.i4.1
L_0032: stloc.s text3
L_0034: ldloc.s num3
L_0036: ldc.i4.1
L_0037: add.ovf
L_0038: stloc.s num3
L_003a: ldloc.s num3
L_003c: ldc.i4.s 20
L_003e: blt.s L_0043
L_0040: ldc.i4.0
L_0041: stloc.s num3
L_0043: nop
L_0044: ldloc.2
L_0045: ldc.i4.1
L_0046: add.ovf
L_0047: stloc.2
L_0048: ldloc.2
L_0049: ldloc.s num4
L_004b: ble.s L_001a
L_004d: ldloc.s text3
L_004f: stloc.0
L_0050: br.s L_0052
L_0052: ldloc.0
L_0053: ret
}
.method private instance
string Register(
string instr) cil managed
{
// Code Size: 44 byte(s)
.maxstack 5
.locals (
L_0000: nop
L_0006: stloc.1
L_000c: stloc.0
L_000d: ldloc.0
L_000e: ldloc.1
L_000f: ldloc.0
L_0010: ldarg.0
L_0011: ldarg.1
L_001c: ldc.i4.0
L_0027: stloc.2
L_0028: br.s L_002a
L_002a: ldloc.2
L_002b: ret
}
1. Dotfuscator Community Edition MSIL
{
// Code Size: 84 byte(s)
.maxstack 5
.locals (
L_0000: nop
L_0001: ldstr "a#2151336fdaghksfges"
L_0006: stloc.3
L_0007: ldarg.1
L_000d: stloc.1
L_000e: ldc.i4.0
L_000f: stloc.s num3
L_0011: ldc.i4.0
L_0012: ldloc.1
L_0013: ldc.i4.1
L_0014: sub.ovf
L_0015: stloc.s num4
L_0017: stloc.2
L_0018: br.s L_0048
L_001a: ldloc.s text3
L_001c: ldarg.1
L_001d: ldloc.2
L_001e: ldc.i4.1
L_0024: ldloc.3
L_0025: ldloc.s num3
L_0027: ldc.i4.1
L_0032: stloc.s text3
L_0034: ldloc.s num3
L_0036: ldc.i4.1
L_0037: add.ovf
L_0038: stloc.s num3
L_003a: ldloc.s num3
L_003c: ldc.i4.s 20
L_003e: blt.s L_0043
L_0040: ldc.i4.0
L_0041: stloc.s num3
L_0043: nop
L_0044: ldloc.2
L_0045: ldc.i4.1
L_0046: add.ovf
L_0047: stloc.2
L_0048: ldloc.2
L_0049: ldloc.s num4
L_004b: ble.s L_001a
L_004d: ldloc.s text3
L_004f: stloc.0
L_0050: br.s L_0052
L_0052: ldloc.0
L_0053: ret
}
{
// Code Size: 44 byte(s)
.maxstack 5
.locals (
L_0000: nop
L_0006: stloc.1
L_000c: stloc.0
L_000d: ldloc.0
L_000e: ldloc.1
L_000f: ldloc.0
L_0010: ldarg.0
L_0011: ldarg.1
L_001c: ldc.i4.0
L_0027: stloc.2
L_0028: br.s L_002a
L_002a: ldloc.2
L_002b: ret
}
评价:还是和源代码基本上一样…我不知道把这种东西给我们有什么意思
2. XeonCode MSIL
.method private instance
string x246b032720dd4c0d(
string x96c91b85a03f00b0) cil managed
{
// Code Size: 105 byte(s)
.maxstack 6
.locals (
L_0000: ldstr "\uec3b\uf2fa\ufa06\u0102\u0803\u0efc\u15fb\u1cf8\u23f8\u2b25\u3220\u391a\u401d\u471b\u4e1b\u5520\u5c10\u630e\u6a09\u7114"
L_0005: ldc.i4 281144282
L_0014: stloc.3
L_0015: ldarg.1
L_001b: stloc.1
L_001c: ldc.i4.0
L_001d: stloc.s num3
L_001f: br.s L_0043
L_0021: stloc.s text3
L_0023: ldloc.s num3
L_0025: br.s L_0030
L_0027: ldc.i4.s 20
L_0029: blt.s L_0038
L_002b: ldc.i4.0
L_002c: stloc.s num3
L_002e: br.s L_0038
L_0030: ldc.i4.1
L_0031: add.ovf
L_0032: stloc.s num3
L_0034: ldloc.s num3
L_0036: br.s L_0027
L_0038: ldloc.2
L_0039: ldc.i4.1
L_003a: add.ovf
L_003b: stloc.2
L_003c: ldloc.2
L_003d: ldloc.s num4
L_003f: ble.s L_004c
L_0041: br.s L_0066
L_0043: ldc.i4.0
L_0044: ldloc.1
L_0045: ldc.i4.1
L_0046: sub.ovf
L_0047: stloc.s num4
L_0049: stloc.2
L_004a: br.s L_003c
L_004c: ldloc.s text3
L_004e: ldarg.1
L_004f: ldloc.2
L_0050: ldc.i4.1
L_0056: ldloc.3
L_0057: ldloc.s num3
L_0059: ldc.i4.1
L_0064: br.s L_0021
L_0066: ldloc.s text3
L_0068: ret
}
.method private instance
string x2a0cb95ab84ba877(
string x5b3e4cba383dedd9) cil managed
{
// Code Size: 39 byte(s)
.maxstack 6
.locals (
L_0005: stloc.1
L_000b: stloc.0
L_000c: ldloc.0
L_000d: ldloc.1
L_000e: ldloc.0
L_000f: ldarg.0
L_0010: ldarg.1
L_001b: ldc.i4.0
L_0026: ret
}
评价:有点花指令,不过在MSIL的状态下,源码的逻辑尽显无疑,也可以畅读一番,不太理想
3. MaxtoCode MSIL
.method private instance
string Encrypt(
string inStr) cil managed
{
}
.method private instance
string Register(
string instr) cil managed
{
}
评价:依然无法看到代码,那怕是较底层的MSIL也无法看见.这下应该安全了.
以上的比较让您更清楚谁对您的知识产权保护更完美了吧。
排除代码层面上的因素,我们再看看其它方面吧。
待续。。。
发表于 @ 2005年04月14日 22:07:00|评论(loading...)