Effective STL:Item 16: Know how to pass vector and string data to

原创 2001年06月06日 22:05:00

 

Since C++was standardized in 1998,the C++elite haven¡¯tbeenterri-bly
subtle in their attempt to nudge programmers away from arrays
and towards vectors. They¡¯ve been similarly overt in trying to get devel-opers
to shift from char* pointers to string objects. There are good rea-sons
for making these changes, including the elimination of common
programming errors (see Item 13) and the ability to take full advan-tage
of the power of the STL algorithms (see, e.g., Item 31).
Still, obstacles remain, and one of the most common is the existence
of legacy C APIs that traffic in arrays and char* pointers instead of vec-tor
and string objects. Such APIs will exist for a long time, so we must
makepeace with them if we aretouse theSTL effectively.
Fortunately, it¡¯s easy. If you have a vector v and you need to get a
pointer to the data in v thatcan be viewedasan array,just use&v[0].
For a string s, the corresponding incantation is simply s.c_str().But
read on. As the fine print in advertising often points out, certain
restrictions apply.
Given
vector<int> v;
the expression v[0] yields a reference to the first element in the vector,
so &v[0] is a pointer to that first element. The elements in a vector are
constrained by the C++ Standard to be stored in contiguous memory,
just like an array, so if we wish to pass v to a C API that looks some-thing
like this,
void doSomething(const int* pInts, size_t numInts);
we can do it like this:
doSomething(&v[0], v.size());
Maybe. Probably. The only sticking point is if v is empty. If it is, v.si ze()
is zero, and &v[0] attempts to produce a pointer to something that
does not exist. Not good. Undefined results. A safer way to code the
call is this:ഊif (!v.empty()) {
doSomething(&v[0], v.size());
}
If you travel in the wrong circles, you may run across shady charac-ters
who will tell you that you can use v.begin() in place of &v[0],
because (these loathsome creatures will tell you) begin returns an iter-ator
into the vector,andforvectors, iterators are really pointers. That¡¯s
often true, but as Item 50 reveals, it¡¯s not always true, and you should
never rely on it. The return type of begin is an iterator, not a pointer,
and you should never use begin when you need to get a pointer to the
data in a vector.If you¡¯redeterminedto typev.begi n() for some reason,
type &*v.begin(), because that will yield the same pointer as &v[0],
though it¡¯s more work for you as a typist and more obscure for people
trying to make sense of your code. Frankly, if you¡¯re hanging out with
people who tell you to use v.begin() instead of &v[0],youneedto
rethink your social circle.
The approach to getting a pointer to container data that works for vec-tors
isn¡¯t reliable for strings, because (1) the data for strings arenot
guaranteed to be stored in contiguous memory, and (2) the internal
representation of a string is not guaranteed to end with a null charac-ter.
This explains the existence of the string member function c_str,
which returns a pointer to the value of the string in a form designed
for C. We can thus pass a string s to this function,
void doSomething(const char *pString);
like this:
doSomething(s.c_str());
This works even if the string is of length zero. In that case, c_str will
return a pointer to a null character. It also works if the string has
embedded nulls. If it does, however, doSomething is likely to interpret
the first embedded null as the end of the string. string objects don¡¯t
care if they contain null characters, but char*-based C APIs do.
Look again at the doSomething declarations:
void doSomething(const int* pInts, size_t numInts);
void doSomething(const char *pString);
In both cases, the pointers being passed are pointers to const.Thevec-tor
or string data are being passed to an API that will read it, not mod-ify
it. This is by far the safest thing to do. For strings, it¡¯s the only thing
to do, because there is no guarantee that c_str yields a pointer to the
internal representation of the string data; it could return a pointer to
an unmodifiable copy ofthe string¡¯s data,one that¡¯scorrectlyformat-ഊted for a C API. (If this makes the efficiency hairs on the back of your
neck rise up in alarm, rest assured that the alarm is probably false. I
don¡¯t know of any contemporary library implementation that takes
advantage of this latitude.)
For a vector, you have a little more flexibility. If you pass v to a C API
that modifies v¡¯s elements, that¡¯s typically okay, but the called routine
must not attempt to change the number of elements in the vector. For
example, it must not try to ¡°create¡± new elements in a vector¡¯s unused
capacity.If it does,v will become internally inconsistent, because it
won¡¯t know its correct size any longer. v.si ze() will yield incorrect
results. And if the called routine attempts to add data to a vector
whose size andcapacity(seeItem14)arethe same,truly horrible
things could happen. I don¡¯t even want to contemplate them. They¡¯re
just too awful.
Did you notice my use of the word ¡°typically¡± in the phrase ¡°that¡¯s typ-ically
okay¡± in the preceding paragraph? Of course you did. Some vec-tors
have extra constraints on their data, and if you pass a vector to
an API that modifies the vector¡¯s data, you must ensure that the addi-tional
constraints continue to be satisfied. For example, Item 23
explains how sorted vectors can often be a viable alternative to asso-ciative
containers, but it¡¯s important for such vectors to remain
sorted. If you pass a sorted vector to an API that may modify the vec-tor¡¯s
data, you¡¯ll need to take into account that the vector may no
longer be sorted after the call has returned.
If you have a vector that you¡¯d like to initialize with elements from a C
API, you can take advantage of the underlying layout compatibility of
vectors andarraysbypassingtothe APIthe storagefor thevector¡¯s
elements:
// C API: this function takes a pointer to an array of at most arraySize
// doubles and writes data to it. It returns the number of doubles written,
// which is never more than maxNumDoubles.
size_t fillArray(double *pArray, size_t arraySize);
vector<double> vd(maxNumDoubles); // create a vector whose
// size is maxNumDoubles
vd.resize(fillArray(&vd[0], vd.size())); // have fillArray write data
// into vd, then resize vd
// to the number of
// elements fillArray wrote
This technique works only for vectors, because only vectors areguar-anteed
to have the same underlying memory layout as arrays. If you
want to initialize a string with data from a C API, however, you can doഊit easily enough. Just have the API put the data into a vector<char>,
then copy the data from the vector to the string:
// C API: this function takes a pointer to an array of at most arraySize
// chars and writes data to it. It returns the number of chars written,
// which is never more than maxNumChars.
size_t fillString(char *pArray, size_t arraySize);
vector<char> vc(maxNumChars); // create a vector whose
// size is maxNumChars
size_t charsWritten = fillString(&vc[0], vc.size()); // have fillString write
// into vc
string s(vc.begin(), vc.begin()+charsWritten); // copy data from vc to s
// via range constructor
// ( see Item 5)
In fact, the idea of having a C API put data into a vector and then copy-ing
the data into the STL container you really want it in always works:
size_t fillArray(double *pArray, size_t arraySize); // as above
vector<double> vd(maxNumDoubles); // also as above
vd.resize(fillArray(&vd[0], vd.size());
deque<double> d(vd.begin(), vd.end()); // copy data into
// deque
list<double> l(vd.begin(), vd.end()); // copy data into list
set<double> s(vd.begin(), vd.end()); // copy data into set
Furthermore, this hints at how STL containers other than vector or
string can pass their data to C APIs. Just copy each container¡¯s data
into a vector, then pass it to the API:
void doSomething(const int* pInts, size_t numInts); // C API (from above)
set<int> intSet; // set that will hold
... // data to pass to API
vector<int> v(intSet.begin(), intSet.end()); // copy set data into
// a vector
if (!v.empty()) doSomething(&v[0], v.size()); // pass the data to
// the API
You could copy the data into an array, too, then pass the array to the
C API, but why would you want to? Unless you know the size of the
container during compilation, you¡¯d have to allocate the array dynam-ically,
and Item 13 explains why you should prefer vectors to dynami-cally
allocated arrays anyway.

Effective STL 16 pass vector and string data to legacy APIs

pass vector and string data to legacy APIs
  • ruihuank
  • ruihuank
  • 2017年08月26日 21:59
  • 56

STL<vector>用法汇总

使用场合: vector算是一个比较万金油的容器,它是一个可变大小数组,支持随机访问,不过在尾部以外的位置进行增加和删除操作会比较耗时。通常用vector来代替原始的数组来使用,比较方便。 ...
  • weixin_35929051
  • weixin_35929051
  • 2016年09月25日 13:16
  • 1207

Effective STL 中文版(完整版)

 Winter总算找到《Effective STL》的完整中文版了,奉献给大家。书中作者解释了怎样结合STL组件来在库的设计得到最大的好处。这样的信息允许你对简单、直接的问题开发简单、直接的解决方案,...
  • WinterTree
  • WinterTree
  • 2005年01月16日 01:23
  • 16315

STL vectorz中的 resize方法(16)

public member function std::vector::resize C++98 C++11 void resize (size_type ...
  • guang_jing
  • guang_jing
  • 2014年08月13日 17:18
  • 1549

HDU - 3948 The Number of Palindromes 后缀数组+ST表、distinct substring

题意:给出一个字符串,求出其回文子串的种数。 后缀数组+ST表 把s变成 s + '#' + s',其中s'表示s的反向串。 所以当回文子串的长度为奇数时 [i+1, _rank[n - sa[i...
  • ProLightsfxjh
  • ProLightsfxjh
  • 2017年02月22日 23:11
  • 424

ndk 使用vector、string等stl库的方法

项目右键properties
  • chrisfxs
  • chrisfxs
  • 2014年07月04日 15:07
  • 4844

关于: Don't know how to iterate over supplied "items" in &lt;forEach&gt;

javax.servlet.ServletException: javax.servlet.jsp.JspTagException: Don't know how to iterate over su...
  • hx18652266251
  • hx18652266251
  • 2017年02月19日 23:37
  • 754

STL中基本容器string,vector,list,deque,set,map之间的区别

在STL中基本容器有: string、vector、list、deque、set、map set 和map都是无序的保存元素,只能通过它提供的接口对里面的元素进行访问; set: 集合, 用来判断...
  • moxiaomomo
  • moxiaomomo
  • 2011年10月06日 11:13
  • 3285

STL容器类的继承

 STL容器类的继承     即时创建一个元素序列的能力是惊人的,它实现了你过去可能会花费(或者更确切的是浪费)多少时间才能解决这个特定的问题。例如,许多实用程序都涉及将文件读到内存,修改文件然后将它...
  • xylary
  • xylary
  • 2007年08月01日 16:33
  • 2793

Effective STL -- vector和string

13.vector和string优先于动态分配的数组 使用vector和string和数组相比,减少了管理内存的工作量。可以使用begin,end,size等函数vector和string拥有i...
  • zjufirefly
  • zjufirefly
  • 2015年03月17日 14:34
  • 4569
内容举报
返回顶部
收藏助手
不良信息举报
您举报文章:Effective STL:Item 16: Know how to pass vector and string data to
举报原因:
原因补充:

(最多只允许输入30个字)