<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>董昊(昊子)的专栏 - .NET盲点</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/category/325267.aspx</link><description>.NET 盲点</description><dc:language>zh-CN</dc:language><lastUpdateTime>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:45:08 GMT</lastUpdateTime><ttl>60</ttl><item><dc:creator>董昊</dc:creator><title>构建Asp.Net2.0 GridView复合多层表头的几种方法</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2008/01/29/2070869.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2008/01/29/2070869.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/2070869.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2008/01/29/2070869.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/commentRss/2070869.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=2070869</trackback:ping><description>两种方法都有一个缺点就是对动态生成的列支持不好，方法二可能更不稳定一点。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/aggbug/2070869.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>董昊</dc:creator><title>asp.net如何取得纯客户端控件的值</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/11/02/1864252.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/11/02/1864252.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/1864252.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/11/02/1864252.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/commentRss/1864252.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1864252</trackback:ping><description>asp.net如何取得纯客户端控件的值&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/aggbug/1864252.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>董昊</dc:creator><title>用户自定义控件加载顺序和Page_PreRender</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/10/09/1816303.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/10/09/1816303.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/1816303.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/10/09/1816303.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/commentRss/1816303.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1816303</trackback:ping><description>用户自定义控件加载顺序和Page_PreRender&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/aggbug/1816303.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>昊子</dc:creator><title>.net程序员的盲点（八）：泛型</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/23/1756207.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/23/1756207.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/1756207.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/23/1756207.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/commentRss/1756207.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1756207</trackback:ping><description>泛型&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/aggbug/1756207.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>昊子</dc:creator><title>.net程序员的盲点（七）：转换关键字：operator、explicit与implicit </title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/18/1749671.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/18/1749671.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/1749671.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/18/1749671.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/commentRss/1749671.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1749671</trackback:ping><description>operator、explicit与implicit 很少用到，但也不能不知道，发现这篇写很好，转一篇operator.public static result-type operator binary-operator ( op-type operand, op-type2 operand2 )unary-operator 下列运算符之一： - !~ — true false op-type 第一个（或唯一一个）参数的类型。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/aggbug/1749671.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>昊子</dc:creator><title>.net程序员的盲点（六）：StringBuilder 和 String 的区别</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/17/1749081.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 22:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/17/1749081.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/1749081.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/17/1749081.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/commentRss/1749081.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1749081</trackback:ping><description>  
String 在进行运算时（如赋值、拼接等）会产生一个新的实例，而 StringBuilder 则不会。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/aggbug/1749081.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>昊子</dc:creator><title>.net程序员的盲点（五）：告诉你一个不一样的new</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/17/1749074.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/17/1749074.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/1749074.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/17/1749074.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/commentRss/1749074.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1749074</trackback:ping><description>new有三种用法：

1.             运算符

2.             修饰符

3.             泛型中的new()约束
&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/aggbug/1749074.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>昊子</dc:creator><title>.net程序员的盲点（四）：索引器Indexers</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/13/1740181.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/13/1740181.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/1740181.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/13/1740181.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/commentRss/1740181.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1740181</trackback:ping><description>索引器Indexers&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/aggbug/1740181.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>昊子</dc:creator><title>.net程序员的盲点（三）：const和static readonly的区别</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/07/1730799.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/07/1730799.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/1730799.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/07/1730799.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/commentRss/1730799.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1730799</trackback:ping><description>const和static readonly的确很像，都在程序中只读，都是一旦初始化则都不再可以改写都是属于语言的静态&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/aggbug/1730799.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>昊子</dc:creator><title>.net程序员的盲点（二）：两个“属性”引起的歧异-property和attribute的区别</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/05/1727760.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 22:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/05/1727760.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/1727760.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/05/1727760.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/commentRss/1727760.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1727760</trackback:ping><description>property和attribute的区别 
&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/aggbug/1727760.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>昊子</dc:creator><title>.net程序员的盲点（一）：参数修饰符ref,out ,params的区别</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/03/1724678.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 16:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/03/1724678.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/1724678.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/archive/2007/08/03/1724678.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/comments/commentRss/1724678.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1724678</trackback:ping><description>C#中有三个关键字-ref,out ,params&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/edisundong/aggbug/1724678.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>