http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/zh-CNFri, 15 Oct 2004 18:16:59 GMT60icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/10/15/138183.aspxFri, 15 Oct 2004 18:17:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/10/15/138183.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/138183.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/10/15/138183.aspx#Feedback3http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/138183.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=138183自定义Windows 2000的文件保护功能 <img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/138183.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/08/06/67171.aspxFri, 06 Aug 2004 16:39:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/08/06/67171.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/67171.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/08/06/67171.aspx#Feedback4http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/67171.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=67171一般我们选择Windows的管理工具都是从控制面板-〉管理工具里面去选择相关的组件，然后再进行管理。在论坛上面可以看到很多的人告诉大家运行gpedit.msc, secpol.msc, dsa.msc这样的命令就直接把管理工具启用起来了。 这样大家会不会认为多此一举呢？我个人认为不会，因为作为系统管理员来说，平时都是使用的Domain Users用户帐号登录，而且你所维护的客户端也是。当你需要用管理员身份维护系统的时候，最好的做法就是Runas，而多数时候，客户端的普通用户是看不见管理工具的，这个时候命令行模式的优势就非常的明显了：） 怎么样？把列表里面的东西全部运行一次吧：） <img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/67171.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/08/03/60262.aspxTue, 03 Aug 2004 23:25:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/08/03/60262.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/60262.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/08/03/60262.aspx#Feedback1http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/60262.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=60262一般来说ftp自动化比较好解决，那么telnet呢？ 或者可以说all batch:-p<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/60262.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/07/14/41378.aspxWed, 14 Jul 2004 14:58:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/07/14/41378.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/41378.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/07/14/41378.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/41378.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=41378很久没有更新小Z日志了，因为第三回的问题过于简单，造成第四回不知道如何下手，还请见谅。<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/41378.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/05/17/11480.aspxMon, 17 May 2004 17:57:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/05/17/11480.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/11480.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/05/17/11480.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/11480.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=11480<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/11480.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/04/19/11479.aspxMon, 19 Apr 2004 00:09:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/04/19/11479.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/11479.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/04/19/11479.aspx#Feedback1http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/11479.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=11479<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/11479.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/03/03/11478.aspxWed, 03 Mar 2004 11:38:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/03/03/11478.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/11478.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/03/03/11478.aspx#Feedback1http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/11478.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=11478<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/11478.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/20/11477.aspxFri, 20 Feb 2004 11:10:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/20/11477.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/11477.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/20/11477.aspx#Feedback4http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/11477.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=11477<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/11477.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/17/11476.aspxTue, 17 Feb 2004 18:59:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/17/11476.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/11476.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/17/11476.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/11476.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=11476<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/11476.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/17/11475.aspxTue, 17 Feb 2004 18:52:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/17/11475.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/11475.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/17/11475.aspx#Feedback1http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/11475.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=11475<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/11475.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/15/11473.aspxSun, 15 Feb 2004 23:35:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/15/11473.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/11473.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/15/11473.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/11473.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=11473<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/11473.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/15/11474.aspxSun, 15 Feb 2004 23:35:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/15/11474.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/11474.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/15/11474.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/11474.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=11474<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/11474.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/15/11470.aspxSun, 15 Feb 2004 23:29:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/15/11470.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/11470.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/15/11470.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/11470.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=11470<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/11470.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/11/11472.aspxWed, 11 Feb 2004 17:31:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/11/11472.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/11472.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/11/11472.aspx#Feedback3http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/11472.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=11472<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/11472.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />icuc88http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/10/11471.aspxTue, 10 Feb 2004 12:16:00 GMThttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/10/11471.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/11471.aspxhttp://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/archive/2004/02/10/11471.aspx#Feedback1http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/comments/commentRss/11471.aspxhttp://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=11471<img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/icuc88/aggbug/11471.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />