zhou JamesID:jameszhou
87856次访问,排名1045好友2人,关注者27
PMP & MCAD
jameszhou的文章
原创 89 篇
翻译 0 篇
转载 0 篇
评论 71 篇
James Zhou的公告
Locations of visitors to this page

最近评论
chjttony:说多了,没什么意思啊,时间才能证明一切,等到看就有答案了
kenpusney:总感觉微软没前途...
控制帐户:很好。
找了半天什么是控制帐户,终于看到这里有说明。
不过英文看起来恼火。
aladdin:這沒有帶來什麼思想解放阿...

1. HttpContext.RewriteUrl,從2003年就開始用了。

2. M$沒事把這些並不是常常需要用到的把戲,弄得好像和藹可親,但卻常常忘記了: 1) Layering,2) Lightweight,再加上M$常常給出不正確的practice,以致於新的小朋友進公司,還得要花上很多時間把這些錯誤從他們的……
tcly:好像有点牛头不对马嘴呀
文章分类
收藏
    相册
    链接
    Old Blog - Runner on .NET
    存档
    订阅我的博客
    XML聚合  FeedSky

    原创 [概念] Nominal Group Analysis收藏

    新一篇: [概念] Matrix Diagram | 旧一篇: [概念] Force Field Analysis

    PMBOK (2004 3rd 英) P186 质量规划工具中提到了Nominal Group Analysis但是没有具体解释,下面是一些补充

    http://www.joe.org/joe/1984march/iw2.html

    This technique is a structured variation of small group discussion methods. The process prevents the domination of discussion by a single person, encourages the more passive group members to participate, and results in a set of prioritized solutions or recommendations (consensus). The steps to follow in NGT are:
    1. Divide the people present into small groups of 5 or 6 members, preferably seated around a table.
    2. State an open-ended question (" What are some ways we could encourage participants to car pool?").
    3. Have each Person spend several minutes in silence individually brainstorming all the possible ideas and jot these ideas down.
    4. Have the groups, collect the ideas by sharing them roundrobin fashion (one response per person each time), while all are recorded in key term, on a flipchart. No criticism is allowed, but clarification in response to questions is encouraged.
    5. Have each person evaluate the ideas and individually and anonymously vote for the best ones (for example, the, best idea gets Points, next best 4 Points, etc).
    6. Share votes within the group and tabulate. A group report is prepared, showing the ideas receiving the most points.
    7. Allow time for brief group presentations on their solutions.
      这种方法与风险管理中的Delphi技术的目的一样 - 避免个人因素,达到一致意见(consensus)。不同的是实现方法,Delphi主要利用的是questionaire

    发表于 @ 2007年06月25日 23:25:00|评论(loading...)|编辑

    新一篇: [概念] Matrix Diagram | 旧一篇: [概念] Force Field Analysis

    评论:没有评论。

    发表评论  


    当前用户设置只有注册用户才能发表评论。如果你没有登录,请点击登录
    Csdn Blog version 3.1a
    Copyright © James Zhou