<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>lxwde - Anders Hejlsberg访谈</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/category/212853.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>zh-CN</dc:language><lastUpdateTime>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:45:00 GMT</lastUpdateTime><ttl>60</ttl><item><dc:creator>lxwde</dc:creator><title>C#、Java以及C++的泛型</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/09/04/1175534.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/09/04/1175534.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/comments/1175534.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/09/04/1175534.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/comments/commentRss/1175534.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1175534</trackback:ping><description>Anders Hejlsberg，C#的主架构师，与Bruce Eckel和Bill Venners 谈论了C#和Java的泛型、C++模板、C#的constraints特性以及弱类型化和强类型化的问题。 
&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/aggbug/1175534.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>lxwde</dc:creator><title>Anders Hejlsberg访谈：Inappropriate Abstractions</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/09/04/1175451.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/09/04/1175451.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/comments/1175451.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/09/04/1175451.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/comments/commentRss/1175451.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1175451</trackback:ping><description>Anders Hejlsberg，C#的主架构师，与Bruce Eckel和Bill Venners 谈论了试图让网络透明的分布式系统，以及试图屏蔽掉数据库的对象——关系映射。C#的产品经理Dan Fernandez以及C#编译器的程序经理Eric Gunnerson也参见了这次讨论。 &lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/aggbug/1175451.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>lxwde</dc:creator><title>Anders Hejlsberg访谈：契约和互操作性</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/07/13/915507.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/07/13/915507.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/comments/915507.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/07/13/915507.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/comments/commentRss/915507.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=915507</trackback:ping><description>Anders Hejlsberg，C#的主架构师，与Bruce Eckel和Bill Venners 谈论了DLL hell、接口契约、strong anmes以及互操作的重要性。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/aggbug/915507.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>lxwde</dc:creator><title>Anders Hejlsberg访谈：版本，虚函数和覆写</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/07/02/866738.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 18:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/07/02/866738.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/comments/866738.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/07/02/866738.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/comments/commentRss/866738.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=866738</trackback:ping><description>Anders Hejlsberg，C#的主架构师，与Bruce Eckel和Bill Venners谈论了为什么C#的方法默认是非虚函数，以及为什么程序员必须显式 指定覆写（override）。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/aggbug/866738.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>lxwde</dc:creator><title>Anders Hejlsberg访谈：委托、组件以及表面上的简单性</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/07/02/865523.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 12:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/07/02/865523.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/comments/865523.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/07/02/865523.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/comments/commentRss/865523.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=865523</trackback:ping><description>Anders Hejlsberg，C#的主架构师，与Bruce Eckel和Bill Venners谈论了谈论了委托（delegates）以及C#对于组件的概念给予的头等待遇。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/aggbug/865523.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>lxwde</dc:creator><title>Anders Hejlsberg访谈：Checked Exceptions的问题</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/06/14/797302.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/06/14/797302.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/comments/797302.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/06/14/797302.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/comments/commentRss/797302.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=797302</trackback:ping><description>Anders Hejlsberg，C#的主架构师，与Bruce Eckel和Bill Venners谈论了已检测异常（checked exceptions）的版本（versionability）问题和可伸缩性（scalability）问题。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/aggbug/797302.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>lxwde</dc:creator><title>Anders Hejlsberg访谈：C#的设计过程</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/06/14/797257.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/06/14/797257.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/comments/797257.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/archive/2006/06/14/797257.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/comments/commentRss/797257.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=797257</trackback:ping><description>Anders Hejlsberg，C#的主架构师，与Bruce Eckel和Bill Venners谈论了C#设计团队所采用的流程，以及在语言设计中可用性研究（usability studies）和好的品味（good taste）相对而言的优点。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/lxwde/aggbug/797257.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>