<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>papercrane的专栏</title><link /><description /><dc:language>zh-CN</dc:language><lastUpdateTime>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:41:00 GMT</lastUpdateTime><ttl>60</ttl><item><dc:creator>papercrane</dc:creator><title>你为什么要做自动化测试</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2008/06/05/2513963.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2008/06/05/2513963.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/2513963.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2008/06/05/2513963.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/2513963.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=2513963</trackback:ping><description>怎样做自动化测试听得多了，想了解为什么做，什么时候做吗？&lt;img src ="aggbug/2513963.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>papercrane</dc:creator><title>飞花摘叶还是重剑无锋</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2008/04/16/2296377.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2008/04/16/2296377.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/2296377.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2008/04/16/2296377.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/2296377.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=2296377</trackback:ping><description>开发和测试工程师写出来的代码有高下之分吗？&lt;img src ="aggbug/2296377.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>papercrane</dc:creator><title>纯技术角度看自动化测试的迷思</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/08/17/1747560.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/08/17/1747560.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/1747560.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/08/17/1747560.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>11</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1747560.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1747560</trackback:ping><description>纯粹从技术角度分析自动化测试中的不正确假设。&lt;img src ="aggbug/1747560.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>papercrane</dc:creator><title>物理实验与软件测试</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/08/12/1739527.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/08/12/1739527.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/1739527.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/08/12/1739527.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1739527.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1739527</trackback:ping><description>物理实验和软件测试看似风牛马不相及，其实其纽带是对未知世界的探索&lt;img src ="aggbug/1739527.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>papercrane</dc:creator><title>来电闪光电话</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/05/14/1609200.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 23:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/05/14/1609200.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/1609200.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/05/14/1609200.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1609200.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1609200</trackback:ping><description>“早知如此，何必当初”。不想项目落到这般田地？考虑计划和设计阶段的测试吧。&lt;img src ="aggbug/1609200.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>papercrane</dc:creator><title>行百里者半九十：浅谈发布测试</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/04/30/1592452.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/04/30/1592452.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/1592452.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/papercrane/archive/2007/04/30/1592452.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1592452.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1592452</trackback:ping><description>你知道哥德堡号是怎样沉没的吗？这跟发布测试有相同之处。&lt;img src ="aggbug/1592452.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>