<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>事事关心 - </title><link>category/360175.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>zh-CN</dc:language><lastUpdateTime>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:39:00 GMT</lastUpdateTime><ttl>60</ttl><item><dc:creator>taoshilong</dc:creator><title>抗震救灾中的杂音</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2008/06/04/2511897.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2008/06/04/2511897.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/2511897.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2008/06/04/2511897.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/2511897.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=2511897</trackback:ping><description>汶川5.12大地震发生后，震惊寰宇，举世同哀。全国上下戮力同心，抗震救灾，显示出中华民族强大的凝聚力和生命力，人们的精神面貌也焕然一新。但是也不能不看到，在有些人身上人性中消极、丑恶的东西仍然在起作用，平时或无表现，面对灾害就暴露出来，其著者如乘机造谣生事，已编有专题[警惕趁地震造谣]；还有借机宣扬地震是天谴，即报应者，也已编有[谴责地震是“天谴” ]专题。还有其他多种形式的消极丑恶现象，未有归类，即建立本专题收录以备查考。&lt;img src ="aggbug/2511897.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>taoshilong</dc:creator><title>大学的问题  </title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2008/01/17/2050080.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2008/01/17/2050080.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/2050080.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2008/01/17/2050080.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/2050080.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=2050080</trackback:ping><description>汇集有关中国高等教育的问题研究&lt;img src ="aggbug/2050080.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>taoshilong</dc:creator><title>[问题研究]在文•法与科学之间</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2007/05/30/1631899.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2007/05/30/1631899.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/1631899.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2007/05/30/1631899.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1631899.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1631899</trackback:ping><description>儒以文乱法，侠以武犯禁，而人主兼礼之，此所以乱也。夫离(通“罹”)法(离法，犯法)者罪，而诸先生(诸先生，众儒生)以文学取；...故法之所非，君之所取；吏之所诛，上之所养也。(《韩非子直解》五蠹第四十九 http://www.confucius2000.com/scholar/hanfei/0049.htm )韩非子的主张,在秦始皇治下得到实现,焚书坑儒,以吏为师.然秦二世而亡,文复出于世.到汉武帝独尊儒术,并开以五经取士之先河,后世继之."天子重英豪,文章教尔曹.万般皆下品,唯有读书高."为蒙童所传诵.文学的地位似乎已无与伦比,竺可桢先生曾感叹还是诗人与文豪的势力大,但其实这只是个表象.汉武帝实行的是外儒内法,真正用以维持其统治的还是法,具体说来就是执法的吏.所以这文与法的较量两千年来从未停息,而总是以文的失败,甚至是满门抄斩而告终.及至科学传入中国,现代法制也来来了.这个新法本与科学相通,都是客观理性的产物,但由于中国的现代法制建立不久,还不完备,就是在西方发达国家,他们的法律仍有很多漏洞.所谓最好的律师,常常就是最会钻法律空子的律师,请这样的律师当然得出高价,所以尽管喊法律面前人&lt;img src ="aggbug/1631899.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>taoshilong</dc:creator><title>在思想应该最活跃的地方 </title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2007/04/13/1563977.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2007/04/13/1563977.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/1563977.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2007/04/13/1563977.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/1563977.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1563977</trackback:ping><description>大学是国家培养人才的地方,是研究学术、传播知识的场所,“应该是思想最活跃的地方。”现在是什么状况呢？这里是讨论大学精神文明建设的文章和材料汇集,着重在现实存在的问题研究.&lt;img src ="aggbug/1563977.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>taoshilong</dc:creator><title>中共历史</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2006/02/26/610469.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 21:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2006/02/26/610469.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/610469.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2006/02/26/610469.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/610469.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=610469</trackback:ping><description>收录有关中国共产党的论著与史料的目录或摘要。&lt;img src ="aggbug/610469.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>taoshilong</dc:creator><title>文革研究</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2006/02/25/609734.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2006/02/25/609734.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/609734.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2006/02/25/609734.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/609734.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=609734</trackback:ping><description>研究文革的材料&lt;img src ="aggbug/609734.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>taoshilong</dc:creator><title>中国矿难</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2006/01/10/575716.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2006/01/10/575716.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/575716.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2006/01/10/575716.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/575716.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=575716</trackback:ping><description>有关中国矿难文章的收集.&lt;img src ="aggbug/575716.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>taoshilong</dc:creator><title>中国院士制度</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2005/11/18/532609.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2005/11/18/532609.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/532609.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2005/11/18/532609.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/532609.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=532609</trackback:ping><description>近来对中国的院士制度诟病颇多,是利大于弊还是弊大于利,争论激烈,尚在发展,为此建这一专题,包含五柳村所收存,并链接其他网站相关文件.后来又出现以“院士评选”为名诈骗敛财的假院士事件，而且包括众多著名国企高管和高校教授在内的50余人上当受骗，相关材料也搜集在此。&lt;img src ="aggbug/532609.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>taoshilong</dc:creator><title>中小学科学教育</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2005/10/30/519310.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 03:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2005/10/30/519310.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/519310.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2005/10/30/519310.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/519310.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=519310</trackback:ping><description>我一直认为，提高公民的科学文化素质，包括科学知识、科学方法的传授，科学精神的培养，主要的渠道应该是学校，特别是中小学。事实上他们有一支庞大的教师队伍，天天都在做，不仅有自然和科学方面的课程，今年的语文课本也已收入了一定的科普作品，青少年的课外科普活动，一般也是围绕课堂教学来进行为好。---陶世龙&lt;img src ="aggbug/519310.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>taoshilong</dc:creator><title>南水北调</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2005/10/26/517122.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2005/10/26/517122.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/517122.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2005/10/26/517122.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/517122.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=517122</trackback:ping><description>有关南水北调的材料&lt;img src ="aggbug/517122.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>taoshilong</dc:creator><title>水电及怒江建站</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2005/09/20/485326.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 04:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2005/09/20/485326.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>comments/485326.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/taoshilong/archive/2005/09/20/485326.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>comments/commentRss/485326.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=485326</trackback:ping><description>何祚庥、陆佑楣两院士上书胡温促怒江工程复工 2005年9月11日香港文汇报报道随即为多家网站转发.一般无评论,在新观察论坛上有艾伦以"学界的人渣"为标题贴出此消息,专骂何祚庥院士."上书陈情的行为本身，也再次诉说了这个人品德，就是这个人只能依附于权力才能施展自己的社会抱负。用“院士”之名对权力的包装，只能说是人渣的行为。" 随即有定远舰 反驳:哪一种为民谋利的事情不需要权力。....&lt;img src ="aggbug/485326.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>