1.简单测试TEST
- #include <gtest/gtest.h>
- int Factorial( int n )
- {
- if(n==2) return 100; //故意出个错,嘻嘻
- return n<=0? 1 : n*Factorial(n - 1);
- }
- //用TEST做简单测试
- TEST(TestFactorial, ZeroInput) //第一个参数是测试用例名,第二个参数是测试名:随后的测试结果将以"测试用例名.测试名"的形式给出
- {
- EXPECT_EQ(1, Factorial(0)); //EXPECT_EQ稍候再说,现在只要知道它是测试两个数据是否相等的就行了。
- }
- TEST(TestFactorial, OtherInput)
- {
- EXPECT_EQ(1, Factorial(1));
- EXPECT_EQ(2, Factorial(2));
- EXPECT_EQ(6, Factorial(3));
- EXPECT_EQ(40320, Factorial(8));
- }
- int main(int argc, char* argv[])
- {
- testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc,argv); //用来处理Test相关的命令行开关,如果不关注也可不加
- RUN_ALL_TESTS(); //看函数名就知道干啥了
- std::cin.get(); //只是让它暂停而已,不然一闪就没了
- return 0;
- }
2.多个测试场景需要相同数据配置的情况,用TEST_F
- //用TEST_F做同配置的系列测试
- typedef std::basic_string<TCHAR> tstring;
- struct FooTest : testing::Test {
- //这里定义要测试的东东
- tstring strExe;
- //可以利用构造、析构来初始化一些参数
- FooTest() {}
- virtual ~FooTest() {}
- //如果构造、析构还不能满足你,还有下面两个虚拟函数
- virtual void SetUp() {
- // 在构造后调用
- strExe.resize(MAX_PATH);
- GetModuleFileName(NULL, &strExe[0], MAX_PATH);
- }
- virtual void TearDown() { } // 在析构前调用
- };
- tstring getfilename(const tstring &full) //偶写的从完整路径里取出文件名的函数(路径分隔符假定为'\\')
- {
- return full.substr(full.rfind(_T('\\')));
- }
- tstring getpath(const tstring &full) //偶写的从完整路径里取出路径名的函数(Windows路径)
- {
- return full.substr(0, full.rfind(_T('\\')));
- }
- TEST_F(FooTest, Test_GFN) //测试getfilename函数
- {
- EXPECT_STREQ(_T("Projectexe"), getfilename(strExe).c_str());
- }
- TEST_F(FooTest, Test_GP) //测试getpath函数
- {
- EXPECT_STREQ(_T("D:\\Code\\libs\\google\\gtest-1\\BCC_SPC\\bcc\\ex"), getpath(strExe).c_str());
- }
- int main(int argc, TCHAR* argv[]) //主函数还是一样地
- {
- testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc,argv);
- RUN_ALL_TESTS();
- std::cin.get();
- return 0;
- }
快速入门:
Google提供了两种断言形式,一种以ASSERT_开头,另一种以EXPECT_开头,它们的区别是ASSERT_*一旦失败立马退出,而EXPECT_还能继续下去。
断言列表:
真假条件测试:
致命断言 | 非致命断言 | 验证条件 |
ASSERT_TRUE(condition ); | EXPECT_TRUE(condition ); | condition 为真 |
ASSERT_FALSE(condition ); | EXPECT_FALSE(condition ); | condition 为假 |
数据对比测试:
致命断言 | 非致命断言 | 验证条件 |
ASSERT_EQ(期望值 , 实际值 ); | EXPECT_EQ(期望值 , 实际值 ); | 期望值 == 实际值 |
ASSERT_NE(val1 , val2 ); | EXPECT_NE(val1 , val2 ); | val1 != val2 |
ASSERT_LT(val1 , val2 ); | EXPECT_LT(val1 , val2 ); | val1 < val2 |
ASSERT_LE(val1 , val2 ); | EXPECT_LE(val1 , val2 ); | val1 <= val2 |
ASSERT_GT(val1 , val2 ); | EXPECT_GT(val1 , val2 ); | val1 > val2 |
ASSERT_GE(val1 , val2 ); | EXPECT_GE(val1 , val2 ); | val1 >= val2 |
字符串(针对C形式的字符串,即char*或wchar_t*)对比测试:
致命断言 | 非致命断言 | 验证条件 |
ASSERT_STREQ(expected_str , actual_str ); | EXPECT_STREQ(expected_str , actual_str ); | 两个C字符串有相同的内容 |
ASSERT_STRNE(str1 , str2 ); | EXPECT_STRNE(str1 , str2 ); | 两个C字符串有不同的内容 |
ASSERT_STRCASEEQ(expected_str , actual_str ); | EXPECT_STRCASEEQ(expected_str , actual_str ); | 两个C字符串有相同的内容,忽略大小写 |
ASSERT_STRCASENE(str1 , str2 ); | EXPECT_STRCASENE(str1 , str2 ); | 两个C字符串有不同的内容,忽略大小写 |
TEST宏:
TEST宏的作用是创建一个简单测试,它定义了一个测试函数,在这个函数里可以使用任何C++代码并使用上面提供的断言来进行检查。
TEST的第一个 参数是测试用例名,第二个 参数是测试用例中某项测试的名称。一个测试用例可以包含任意数量的独立测试。这两个参数组成了一个测试的全称。
就前面的例子来说:
我们要测试这个函数:int Factorial(int n); // 返回n的阶乘
我们的测试用例是:测试输入0的情况,测试输入其它数据的情况,于是就有了:
- TEST(TestFactorial, ZeroInput) //第一个参数是测试用例名,第二个参数是测试名:随后的测试结果将以"测试用例名.测试名"的形式给出
- {
- EXPECT_EQ(1, Factorial(0)); //EXPECT_EQ稍候再说,现在只要知道它是测试两个数据是否相等的就行了。
- }
- TEST(TestFactorial, OtherInput)
- {
- EXPECT_EQ(1, Factorial(1));
- EXPECT_EQ(2, Factorial(2));
- EXPECT_EQ(6, Factorial(3));
- EXPECT_EQ(40320, Factorial(8));
- }
Google Test根据测试用例来分组收集测试结果,因此,逻辑相关的测试应该在同一测试用例中;换句话说,它们的TEST()的第一个参数应该是一样的。在上面的 例子中,我们有两个测试,ZeroInput和OtherInput,它们都属于同一个测试用例TestFactorial。
TEST_F宏:
TEST_F宏用于在多个测试中使用同样的数据配置,所以它又叫:测试夹具(Test Fixtures)
如果我们的多个测试要使用相同的数据(如前例中,我们的Test_GFN和Test_GP都使用程序自身的完整文件名来测试),就可以采用一个测试夹具。
要创建测试固件,只需:
- 创建一个类继承自testing::Test。将其中的成员声明为protected:或是public:,因为我们想要从子类中存取夹具成员。
- 在该类中声明测试中所要使用到的数据。
- 如果需要,编写一个默认构造函数或者SetUp()函数来为每个测试准备对象。
- 如果需要,编写一个析构函数或者TearDown()函数来释放你在SetUp()函数中申请的资源。
- 如果需要,定义你的测试所需要共享的子程序。
当我们要使用固件时,使用TEST_F()替换掉TEST(),它允许我们存取测试固件中的对象和子程序:
TEST_F(test_case_name, test_name) {
... test body ...
}
与TEST()一样,第一个参数是测试用例的名称,但对TEST_F()来说,这个名称必须与测试夹具类的名称一样。
对于TEST_F()中定义的每个 测试,Google Test将会:
- 创建一个全新的测试夹具
- 通过SetUp()初始化它,
- 运行测试
- 调用TearDown()来进行清理工作
- 删除测试夹具。
注意,同一测试用例中,不同的测试拥有不同的测试夹具。Google Test不会对多个测试重用一个测试夹具,测试对测试夹具的改动并不会影响到其他测试。
调用测试
TEST()和TEST_F()向Google Test隐式注册它们的测试。因此,与很多其他的C++测试框架不同,你不需要为了运行你定义的测试而将它们全部再列出来一次。
在定义好测试后,你可以通过RUN_ALL_TESTS()来运行它们,如果所有测试成功,该函数返回0,否则会返回1.注意RUN_ALL_TESTS()会运行你链接到的所有测试——它们可以来自不同的测试用例,甚至是来自不同的文件。
当被调用时,RUN_ALL_TESTS()宏会:
- 保存所有的Google Test标志。
- 为一个测试创建测试夹具对象。
- 调用SetUp()初始化它。
- 在固件对象上运行测试。
- 调用TearDown()清理夹具。
- 删除固件。
- 恢复所有Google Test标志的状态。
- 重复上诉步骤,直到所有测试完成。
此外,如果第二步时,测试夹具的构造函数产生一个致命错误,继续执行3至5部显然没有必要,所以它们会被跳过。与之相似,如果第3部产生致命错误,第4部也会被跳过。
重要:你不能忽略掉RUN_ALL_TESTS()的返回值,否则gcc会报一个编译错误。这样设计的理由是自动化测试服务会根据测试退出返回码来 决定一个测试是否通过,而不是根据其stdout/stderr输出;因此你的main()函数必须返回RUN_ALL_TESTS()的值。
而且,你应该只调用RUN_ALL_TESTS()一次。多次调用该函数会与Google Test的一些高阶特性(如线程安全死亡测试thread-safe death tests)冲突,因而是不被支持的。
编写 main() 函数
你可以从下面这个模板开始:
- #include "this/package/foo.h"
- #include <gtest/gtest.h>
- namespace {
- // 测试Foo类的测试固件
- class FooTest : public testing::Test {
- protected :
- // You can remove any or all of the following functions if its body
- // is empty.
- FooTest() {
- // You can do set-up work for each test here.
- }
- virtual ~FooTest() {
- // You can do clean-up work that doesn't throw exceptions here.
- }
- // If the constructor and destructor are not enough for setting up
- // and cleaning up each test, you can define the following methods:
- virtual void SetUp() {
- // Code here will be called immediately after the constructor (right
- // before each test).
- }
- virtual void TearDown() {
- // Code here will be called immediately after each test (right
- // before the destructor).
- }
- // Objects declared here can be used by all tests in the test case for Foo.
- };
- // Tests that the Foo::Bar() method does Abc.
- TEST_F(FooTest, MethodBarDoesAbc) {
- const string input_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myinputfile.dat" ;
- const string output_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myoutputfile.dat" ;
- Foo f;
- EXPECT_EQ(0, f.Bar(input_filepath, output_filepath));
- }
- // Tests that Foo does Xyz.
- TEST_F(FooTest, DoesXyz) {
- // Exercises the Xyz feature of Foo.
- }
- } // namespace
- int main( int argc, char **argv) {
- testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
- return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
- }
testing::InitGoogleTest() 函数负责解析命令行传入的Google Test标志,并删除所有它可以处理的标志。这使得用户可以通过各种不同的标志控制一个测试程序的行为。关于这一点我们会在GTestAdvanced中 讲到。你必须在调用RUN_ALL_TESTS()之前调用该函数,否则就无法正确地初始化标示。
在Windows上InitGoogleTest()可以支持宽字符串,所以它也可以被用在以UNICODE模式编译的程序中。
socket net test:
/system/extras/tests/iptables/qtaguid/socketTag.cpp
/*
* Copyright (C) 2011 The Android Open Source Project
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless requied by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*
*/
/*
* This socket tagging test is to ensure that the
* netfilter/xt_qtaguid kernel module somewhat behaves as expected
* with respect to tagging sockets.
*/
#include <assert.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <string>
#define LOG_TAG "socketTagTest"
#include <utils/Log.h>
#include <testUtil.h>
namespace android {
class SockInfo {
public:
SockInfo() : fd(-1), addr(NULL) {};
int setup(uint64_t tag);
bool checkTag(uint64_t tag, uid_t uid);
int fd;
void *addr;
};
int openCtrl() {
int ctrl;
ctrl = open("/proc/net/xt_qtaguid/ctrl", O_RDWR);
if (!ctrl) {
testPrintE("qtaguid ctrl open failed: %s", strerror(errno));
}
return ctrl;
}
int doCtrlCommand(const char *fmt, ...) {
char *buff;
int ctrl;
int res;
va_list argp;
va_start(argp, fmt);
ctrl = openCtrl();
vasprintf(&buff, fmt, argp);
errno = 0;
res = write(ctrl, buff, strlen(buff));
testPrintI("cmd: '%s' res=%d %d/%s", buff, res, errno, strerror(errno));
close(ctrl);
free(buff);
va_end(argp);
return res;
}
int writeModuleParam(const char *param, const char *data) {
int param_fd;
int res;
std::string filename("/sys/module/xt_qtaguid/parameters/");
filename += param;
param_fd = open(filename.c_str(), O_WRONLY);
if (param_fd < 0) {
testPrintE("qtaguid param open failed: %s", strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
res = write(param_fd, data, strlen(data));
if (res < 0) {
testPrintE("qtaguid param write failed: %s", strerror(errno));
}
close(param_fd);
return res;
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------------*/
int SockInfo::setup(uint64_t tag) {
fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
if (fd < 0) {
testPrintE("socket creation failed: %s", strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
if (doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu", fd, tag) < 0) {
testPrintE("socket setup: failed to tag");
close(fd);
return -1;
}
if (!checkTag(tag, getuid())) {
testPrintE("socket setup: Unexpected results: tag not found");
close(fd);
return -1;
}
if (doCtrlCommand("u %d", fd) < 0) {
testPrintE("socket setup: Unexpected results");
close(fd);
return -1;
}
return 0;
}
/* checkTag() also tries to lookup the socket address in the kernel and
* return it when *addr == NULL.
* This allows for better look ups when another process is also setting the same
* tag + uid. But it is not fool proof.
* Without the kernel reporting more info on who setup the socket tag, it is
* not easily verifiable from user-space.
* Returns: true if tag found.
*/
bool SockInfo::checkTag(uint64_t acct_tag, uid_t uid) {
int ctrl_fd;
ctrl_fd = openCtrl();
char ctrl_data[1024];
ssize_t read_size;
char *buff;
char *pos;
int res;
char *match_template;
uint64_t k_tag;
uint32_t k_uid;
uint64_t full_tag;
long dummy_count;
pid_t dummy_pid;
read_size = read(ctrl_fd, ctrl_data, sizeof(ctrl_data));
if (read_size < 0) {
testPrintE("Unable to read active tags from ctrl %d/%s",
errno, strerror(errno));
}
ctrl_data[read_size] = '\0';
testPrintI("<ctrl_raw_data>\n%s</ctrl_raw_data>", ctrl_data);
if (addr) {
assert(sizeof(void*) == sizeof(long int)); // Why does %p use 0x? grrr. %lx.
asprintf(&match_template, "sock=%lx %s", addr, "tag=0x%llx (uid=%u)");
}
else {
/* Allocate for symmetry */
asprintf(&match_template, "%s", " tag=0x%llx (uid=%u)");
}
full_tag = acct_tag | uid;
asprintf(&buff, match_template, full_tag | uid, uid);
testPrintI("looking for '%s'", buff);
pos = strstr(ctrl_data, buff);
if (pos && !addr) {
assert(sizeof(void*) == sizeof(long int)); // Why does %p use 0x? grrr. %lx.
res = sscanf(pos - strlen("sock=1234abcd"),
"sock=%lx tag=0x%llx (uid=%lu) pid=%u f_count=%lu",
&addr, &k_tag, &k_uid, &dummy_pid, &dummy_count );
if (!(res == 5 && k_tag == full_tag && k_uid == uid)) {
testPrintE("Unable to read sock addr res=%d", res);
addr = 0;
}
else {
testPrintI("Got sock_addr %lx", addr);
}
}
free(buff);
free(match_template);
close(ctrl_fd);
return pos != NULL;
}
class SocketTaggingTest : public ::testing::Test {
protected:
virtual void SetUp() {
ctrl_fd = -1;
dev_fd = -1;
my_uid = getuid();
my_pid = getpid();
srand48(my_pid * my_uid);
// Adjust fake UIDs and tags so that multiple instances can run in parallel.
fake_uid = testRand();
fake_uid2 = testRand();
valid_tag1 = ((uint64_t)my_pid << 48) | ((uint64_t)testRand() << 32);
valid_tag2 = ((uint64_t)my_pid << 48) | ((uint64_t)testRand() << 32);
valid_tag2 &= 0xffffff00ffffffffllu; // Leave some room to make counts visible.
testPrintI("* start: pid=%lu uid=%lu uid1=0x%lx/%lu uid2=0x%lx/%lu"
" tag1=0x%llx/%llu tag2=0x%llx/%llu",
my_pid, my_uid, fake_uid, fake_uid, fake_uid2, fake_uid2,
valid_tag1, valid_tag1, valid_tag2, valid_tag2);
max_uint_tag = 0xffffffff00000000llu;
max_uint_tag = 1llu << 63 | (((uint64_t)my_pid << 48) ^ max_uint_tag);
testPrintI("kernel has qtaguid");
ctrl_fd = openCtrl();
ASSERT_GE(ctrl_fd, 0) << "qtaguid ctrl open failed";
close(ctrl_fd);
dev_fd = open("/dev/xt_qtaguid", O_RDONLY);
EXPECT_GE(dev_fd, 0) << "qtaguid dev open failed";
// We want to clean up any previous faulty test runs.
testPrintI("delete command does not fail");
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("d 0 %u", fake_uid), 0) << "Failed to delete fake_uid";
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("d 0 %u", fake_uid2), 0) << "Failed to delete fake_uid2";
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("d 0 %u", my_uid), 0) << "Failed to delete my_uid";
testPrintI("setup sock0 and addr via tag");
ASSERT_FALSE(sock0.setup(valid_tag1)) << "socket0 setup failed";
testPrintI("setup sock1 and addr via tag");
ASSERT_FALSE(sock1.setup(valid_tag1)) << "socket1 setup failed";
}
virtual void TearDown() {
if (dev_fd >= 0) {
close(dev_fd);
}
if (ctrl_fd >= 0) {
close(ctrl_fd);
}
}
SockInfo sock0;
SockInfo sock1;
int ctrl_fd;
int dev_fd;
uid_t fake_uid;
uid_t fake_uid2;
uid_t my_uid;
pid_t my_pid;
uint64_t valid_tag1;
uint64_t valid_tag2;
uint64_t max_uint_tag;
static const uint64_t invalid_tag1 = 0x0000000100000001llu;
static const int max_tags = 5;
};
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, TagData) {
max_uint_tag = 0xffffffff00000000llu;
char *max_tags_str;
testPrintI("setup tag limit");
asprintf(&max_tags_str, "%d", max_tags);
ASSERT_GE(writeModuleParam("max_sock_tags", max_tags_str), 0) << "Failed to setup tag limit";
testPrintI("tag quota reach limit");
for (int cnt = 0; cnt < max_tags; cnt++ ) {
uint64_t tag = valid_tag2 + ((uint64_t)cnt << 32);
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu %u", sock0.fd, tag , fake_uid2), 0)
<< "Tagging within limit failed";
EXPECT_TRUE(sock0.checkTag(tag, fake_uid2))<< "Unexpected results: tag not found";
}
testPrintI("tag quota go over limit");
uint64_t new_tag = valid_tag2 + ((uint64_t)max_tags << 32);
EXPECT_LT(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu %u", sock0.fd, new_tag , fake_uid2), 0);
EXPECT_TRUE(sock0.checkTag(valid_tag2 + (((uint64_t)max_tags - 1) << 32),
fake_uid2)) << "Unexpected results: tag not found";
testPrintI("valid untag");
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("u %d", sock0.fd), 0);
EXPECT_FALSE(sock0.checkTag(valid_tag2 + (((uint64_t)max_tags - 1) << 32), fake_uid2))
<< "Untagged tag should not be there";
testPrintI("tag after untag should not free up max tags");
uint64_t new_tag2 = valid_tag2 + ((uint64_t)max_tags << 32);
EXPECT_LT(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu %u", sock0.fd, new_tag2 , fake_uid2), 0);
EXPECT_FALSE(sock0.checkTag(valid_tag2 + ((uint64_t)max_tags << 32), fake_uid2))
<< "Tag should not be there";
testPrintI("delete one tag");
uint64_t new_tag3 = valid_tag2 + (((uint64_t)max_tags / 2) << 32);
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("d %llu %u", new_tag3, fake_uid2), 0);
testPrintI("2 tags after 1 delete pass/fail");
uint64_t new_tag4;
new_tag4 = valid_tag2 + (((uint64_t)max_tags + 1 ) << 32);
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu %u", sock0.fd, new_tag4 , fake_uid2), 0);
EXPECT_TRUE(sock0.checkTag(valid_tag2 + (((uint64_t)max_tags + 1) << 32), fake_uid2))
<< "Tag not found";
new_tag4 = valid_tag2 + (((uint64_t)max_tags + 2 ) << 32);
EXPECT_LT(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu %u", sock0.fd, new_tag4 , fake_uid2), 0);
EXPECT_FALSE(sock0.checkTag(valid_tag2 + (((uint64_t)max_tags + 2) << 32), fake_uid2))
<< "Tag should not be there";
/* TODO(jpa): test tagging two different sockets with same tags and
* check refcounts the tag_node should be +2
*/
}
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, InsufficientArgsFails) {
// Insufficient args. Expected failure
EXPECT_LE(doCtrlCommand("t"), 0) << "Insufficient args, should fail.";
}
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, BadCommandFails) {
// Bad command. Expected failure";
EXPECT_LE(doCtrlCommand("?"), 0) << "Bad command, should fail";
}
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, NoTagNoUid) {
// no tag, no uid
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d", sock0.fd), 0);
ASSERT_TRUE(sock0.checkTag(0, my_uid)) << "Tag not found";
}
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, InvalidTagFail) {
// Invalid tag. Expected failure
EXPECT_LE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu", sock0.fd, invalid_tag1), 0);
ASSERT_FALSE(sock0.checkTag(invalid_tag1, my_uid)) << "Tag should not be there";
}
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, ValidTagWithNoUid) {
// Valid tag with no uid
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu", sock0.fd, valid_tag1), 0);
EXPECT_TRUE(sock0.checkTag(valid_tag1, my_uid)) << "Tag not found";
}
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, ValidUntag) {
// Valid untag
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu", sock0.fd, valid_tag1), 0);
EXPECT_TRUE(sock0.checkTag(valid_tag1, my_uid)) << "Tag not found";
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("u %d", sock0.fd), 0);
EXPECT_FALSE(sock0.checkTag(valid_tag1, my_uid)) << "Tag should be removed";
}
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, ValidFirsttag) {
// Valid 1st tag
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu %u", sock0.fd, valid_tag2, fake_uid), 0);
EXPECT_TRUE(sock0.checkTag(valid_tag2, fake_uid)) << "Tag not found.";
}
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, ValidReTag) {
// Valid re-tag
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu %u", sock0.fd, valid_tag2, fake_uid), 0);
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu %u", sock0.fd, valid_tag2, fake_uid), 0);
EXPECT_TRUE(sock0.checkTag(valid_tag2, fake_uid)) << "Tag not found.";
}
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, ValidReTagWithAcctTagChange) {
// Valid re-tag with acct_tag change
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu %u", sock0.fd, valid_tag2, fake_uid), 0);
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu %u", sock0.fd, valid_tag1, fake_uid), 0);
EXPECT_TRUE(sock0.checkTag(valid_tag1, fake_uid)) << "Tag not found.";
}
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, ReTagWithUidChange) {
// Re-tag with uid change
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu %u", sock0.fd, valid_tag1, fake_uid), 0);
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu %u", sock0.fd, valid_tag2, fake_uid2), 0);
}
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, Valid64BitAcctTag) {
// Valid 64bit acct tag
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu", sock0.fd, max_uint_tag), 0);
EXPECT_TRUE(sock0.checkTag(max_uint_tag, my_uid)) << "Tag not found.";
}
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, TagAnotherSocket) {
testPrintI("Tag two sockets");
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu", sock0.fd, max_uint_tag), 0);
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu %u", sock1.fd, valid_tag1, fake_uid2), 0);
EXPECT_TRUE(sock1.checkTag(valid_tag1, fake_uid2)) << "Tag not found.";
testPrintI("Untag socket0 of them only.");
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("u %d", sock0.fd), 0);
EXPECT_FALSE(sock0.checkTag(max_uint_tag, fake_uid)) << "Tag should not be there";
EXPECT_TRUE(sock1.checkTag(valid_tag1, fake_uid2)) << "Tag not found";
testPrintI("Now untag socket1 as well.");
EXPECT_GE(doCtrlCommand("u %d", sock1.fd), 0);
EXPECT_FALSE(sock1.checkTag(valid_tag1, fake_uid2)) << "Tag should not be there";
}
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, TagInvalidSocketFail) {
// Invalid tag. Expected failure
close(sock0.fd);
EXPECT_LE(doCtrlCommand("t %d %llu %u", sock0.fd, valid_tag1, my_uid), 0);
EXPECT_FALSE(sock0.checkTag(valid_tag1, my_uid)) << "Tag should not be there";
}
TEST_F(SocketTaggingTest, UntagInvalidSocketFail) {
// Invalid untag. Expected failure";
close(sock1.fd);
EXPECT_LE(doCtrlCommand("u %d", sock1.fd), 0);
}
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
}
} // namespace android