<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>Eric's Little Hut</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/</link><description>Enjoy Programming, Enjoy Life</description><dc:language>zh-CN</dc:language><lastUpdateTime>Thu, 22 May 2008 01:08:03 GMT</lastUpdateTime><ttl>60</ttl><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>[Linux] gdb crash之后，杀掉僵尸进程的办法</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/12/24/1965131.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/12/24/1965131.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1965131.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/12/24/1965131.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1965131.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1965131</trackback:ping><description>试试kill -18 pid。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1965131.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>[Linux] linux下的GetModuleFileName函数</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/12/14/1935618.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/12/14/1935618.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1935618.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/12/14/1935618.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1935618.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1935618</trackback:ping><description>Linux下GetModuleFileName函数的一种简单实现。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1935618.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>windows和linux的线程同步性能</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/12/04/1916558.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/12/04/1916558.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1916558.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/12/04/1916558.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1916558.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1916558</trackback:ping><description>linux进出一次最快的锁需要49.7纳秒。windows进出一次最快的锁需要13.6纳秒。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1916558.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>有人说Java比C++快？</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/11/12/1880517.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/11/12/1880517.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1880517.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/11/12/1880517.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>16</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1880517.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1880517</trackback:ping><description>Java比C++快这种论点，实在是只有傻瓜才会相信。但是现实是真的很多人相信这一点，而且我居然还跳出来解释。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1880517.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>Linux发行版推荐</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/11/09/1875493.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/11/09/1875493.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1875493.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/11/09/1875493.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1875493.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1875493</trackback:ping><description>CentOS第一，Ubuntu第二。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1875493.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>Putty保存密码，自动登录</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/07/27/1712827.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/07/27/1712827.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1712827.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/07/27/1712827.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1712827.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1712827</trackback:ping><description>自己修改putty，定制一个自己想要的版本。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1712827.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>[Linux] PuTTY和SecureCRT的比较</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/07/20/1700481.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/07/20/1700481.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1700481.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/07/20/1700481.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1700481.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1700481</trackback:ping><description>从windows访问linux，除了samba之外，日常操作用得最多的大概就是PuTTY和SecureCRT.Putty拿来就可以立刻使用，SecureCRT需要经过复杂的配置之后才好用，而且SecureCRT对linux下的emacs的支持不够好。Putty不支持自动登录linux，SecureCRT支持自动登录linux。Putty不支持同时登录多个linux，SecureCRT可以在每个tab page里面登录一个linux。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1700481.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>[linux] 创建daemon进程</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/06/04/1637613.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/06/04/1637613.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1637613.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/06/04/1637613.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1637613.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1637613</trackback:ping><description>如何在linux下启动daemon进程。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1637613.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>[C#] 如何通过TcpClient取得remote ip和port</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/06/01/1634251.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/06/01/1634251.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1634251.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/06/01/1634251.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1634251.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1634251</trackback:ping><description>在我们用TcpListener.AcceptTcpClient()接收连接之后，我们迫切需要有一个方法可以得到对方的ip和port。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1634251.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>[linux] SIGPIPE信号处理</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/05/22/1621151.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 16:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/05/22/1621151.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1621151.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/05/22/1621151.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1621151.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1621151</trackback:ping><description>在linux下写socket的程序的时候，如果尝试send到一个disconnected socket上，就会让底层抛出一个SIGPIPE信号。这个信号的缺省处理方法是退出进程，大多数时候这都不是我们期望的。因此我们需要重载这个信号的处理方法。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1621151.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>[linux] x server can not start under VMWare</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/04/03/1550712.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 16:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/04/03/1550712.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1550712.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/04/03/1550712.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1550712.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1550712</trackback:ping><description>rhel5在vmware上执行startx失败。提示说：no screens found&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1550712.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>哈希算法(Hash Algorithm)初探</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/03/12/1526595.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/03/12/1526595.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1526595.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/03/12/1526595.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1526595.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1526595</trackback:ping><description>不约而同的，几乎所有的流行的hash map都采用了“Times33”算法。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1526595.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>[Linux] device eth0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/02/09/1506125.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/02/09/1506125.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1506125.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2007/02/09/1506125.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1506125.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1506125</trackback:ping><description>在AS4上也许会报device bnx2 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization。造成这个问题的原因好像有不同的情况，不同的情况有不同的解决办法。如果是使用modprobe、insmod之类的命令之后出现这个问题，可以试试depmod命令。depmod可以自动修复一些kernel module的依赖关系。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1506125.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>[Linux] 如何让linux加载当前目录的动态库</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2006/09/21/1256577.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2006/09/21/1256577.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1256577.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2006/09/21/1256577.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1256577.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1256577</trackback:ping><description>设置环境变量LD_LIBRARY_PATH&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1256577.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><title>[C++] Undefined reference to vtable</title><link>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2006/09/20/1252690.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2006/09/20/1252690.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/1252690.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/archive/2006/09/20/1252690.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/comments/commentRss/1252690.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1252690</trackback:ping><description>解决办法：给基类的virtual函数加上本来就应该有的function body。&lt;img src ="http://blog.csdn.net/wwwsq/aggbug/1252690.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>