Locking in Microsoft SQL Server (Quoted from mssqlcity)

Locking in Microsoft SQL Server

Alexander Chigrik
chigrik@mssqlcity.com

Introduction
Transaction Isolation Levels
Lock types
Locking optimizer hints
Deadlocks
View locks (sp_lock)
Literature

Introduction
In this article, I want to tell you about SQL Server 7.0/2000 Transaction Isolation Levels, what kinds of Transaction Isolation Levels exist, and how you can set the appropriate Transaction Isolation Level, about Lock types and Locking optimizer hints, about deadlocks, and about how you can view locks by using the sp_lock stored procedure.

Transaction Isolation Levels
There are four isolation levels:

# READ UNCOMMITTED
# READ COMMITTED
# REPEATABLE READ
# SERIALIZABLE


Microsoft SQL Server supports all of these Transaction Isolation Levels and can separate REPEATABLE READ and SERIALIZABLE.

Let me to describe each isolation level.

READ UNCOMMITTED
When it's used, SQL Server not issue shared locks while reading data. So, you can read an uncommitted transaction that might get rolled back later. This isolation level is also called dirty read. This is the lowest isolation level. It ensures only that a physically corrupt data will not be read.

READ COMMITTED
This is the default isolation level in SQL Server. When it's used, SQL Server will use shared locks while reading data. It ensures that a physically corrupt data will not be read and will never read data that another application has changed and not yet committed, but it not ensures that the data will not be changed before the end of the transaction.

REPEATABLE READ
When it's used, the dirty reads and nonrepeatable reads cannot occur. It means that locks will be placed on all data that is used in a query, and another transactions cannot update the data.

This is the definition of nonrepeatable read from SQL Server Books Online:

nonrepeatable read
When a transaction reads the same row more than one time, and between the
two (or more) reads, a separate transaction modifies that row. Because the
row was modified between reads within the same transaction, each read
produces different values, which introduces inconsistency.

SERIALIZABLE
Most restrictive isolation level. When it's used, the phantom values cannot occur. It prevents other users from updating or inserting rows into the data set until the transaction will be completed.

This is the definition of phantom from SQL Server Books Online:

phantom
Phantom behavior occurs when a transaction attempts to select a row that
does not exist and a second transaction inserts the row before the first
transaction finishes. If the row is inserted, the row appears as a phantom
to the first transaction, inconsistently appearing and disappearing.

You can set the appropriate isolation level for an entire SQL Server session by using the SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL statement.
This is the syntax from SQL Server Books Online:

SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL
    {
        READ COMMITTED
        | READ UNCOMMITTED
        | REPEATABLE READ
        | SERIALIZABLE
    }

You can use the DBCC USEROPTIONS statement to determine the Transaction Isolation Level currently set. This command returns the set options that are active for the current connection. This is the example:

SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
GO
DBCC USEROPTIONS
GO

Lock types
There are three main types of locks that SQL Server 7.0/2000 uses:

# Shared locks
# Update locks
# Exclusive locks


Shared locks are used for operations that do not change or update data, such as a SELECT statement.

Update locks are used when SQL Server intends to modify a page, and later promotes the update page lock to an exclusive page lock before actually making the changes.

Exclusive locks are used for the data modification operations, such as UPDATE, INSERT, or DELETE.

Shared locks are compatible with other Shared locks or Update locks.

Update locks are compatible with Shared locks only.

Exclusive locks are not compatible with other lock types.

Let me to describe it on the real example. There are four processes, which attempt to lock the same page of the same table. These processes start one after another, so Process1 is the first process, Process2 is the second process and so on.

Process1 : SELECT
Process2 : SELECT
Process3 : UPDATE
Process4 : SELECT

Process1 sets the Shared lock on the page, because there are no another locks on this page.
Process2 sets the Shared lock on the page, because Shared locks are compatible with other Shared locks.
Process3 wants to modify data and wants to set Exclusive lock, but it cannot make it before Process1 and Process2 will be finished, because Exclusive lock is not compatible with other lock types. So, Process3 sets Update lock.
Process4 cannot set Shared lock on the page before Process3 will be finished. So, there is no Lock starvation. Lock starvation occurs when read transactions can monopolize a table or page, forcing a write transaction to wait indefinitely. So, Process4 waits before Process3 will be finished.
After Process1 and Process2 were finished, Process3 transfer Update lock into Exclusive lock to modify data. After Process3 was finished, Process4 sets the Shared lock on the page to select data.

Locking optimizer hints
SQL Server 7.0/2000 supports the following Locking optimizer hints:

# NOLOCK
# HOLDLOCK
# UPDLOCK
# TABLOCK
# PAGLOCK
# TABLOCKX
# READCOMMITTED
# READUNCOMMITTED
# REPEATABLEREAD
# SERIALIZABLE
# READPAST
# ROWLOCK


NOLOCK is also known as "dirty reads". This option directs SQL Server not to issue shared locks and not to honor exclusive locks. So, if this option is specified, it is possible to read an uncommitted transaction. This results in higher concurrency and in lower consistency.

HOLDLOCK directs SQL Server to hold a shared lock until completion of the transaction in which HOLDLOCK is used. You cannot use HOLDLOCK in a SELECT statement that includes the FOR BROWSE option. HOLDLOCK is equivalent to SERIALIZABLE.

UPDLOCK instructs SQL Server to use update locks instead of shared locks while reading a table and holds them until the end of the command or transaction.

TABLOCK takes a shared lock on the table that is held until the end of the command. If you also specify HOLDLOCK, the lock is held until the end of the transaction.

PAGLOCK is used by default. Directs SQL Server to use shared page locks.

TABLOCKX takes an exclusive lock on the table that is held until the end of the command or transaction.

READCOMMITTED
Perform a scan with the same locking semantics as a transaction running at the READ COMMITTED isolation level. By default, SQL Server operates at this isolation level.

READUNCOMMITTED
Equivalent to NOLOCK.

REPEATABLEREAD
Perform a scan with the same locking semantics as a transaction running at the REPEATABLE READ isolation level.

SERIALIZABLE
Perform a scan with the same locking semantics as a transaction running at the SERIALIZABLE isolation level. Equivalent to HOLDLOCK.

READPAST
Skip locked rows. This option causes a transaction to skip over rows locked by other transactions that would ordinarily appear in the result set, rather than block the transaction waiting for the other transactions to release their locks on these rows. The READPAST lock hint applies only to transactions operating at READ COMMITTED isolation and will read only past row-level locks. Applies only to the SELECT statement.
You can only specify the READPAST lock in the READ COMMITTED or REPEATABLE READ isolation levels.

ROWLOCK
Use row-level locks rather than use the coarser-grained page- and table-level locks.

You can specify one of these locking options in a SELECT statement.
This is the example:

SELECT au_fname FROM pubs..authors (holdlock)

Deadlocks
Deadlock occurs when two users have locks on separate objects and each user wants a lock on the other's object. For example, User1 has a lock on object "A" and wants a lock on object "B" and User2 has a lock on object "B" and wants a lock on object "A". In this case, SQL Server ends a deadlock by choosing the user, who will be a deadlock victim. After that, SQL Server rolls back the breaking user's transaction, sends message number 1205 to notify the user's application about breaking, and then allows the nonbreaking user's process to continue.

You can decide which connection will be the candidate for deadlock victim by using SET DEADLOCK_PRIORITY. In other case, SQL Server selects the deadlock victim by choosing the process that completes the circular chain of locks.

So, in a multiuser situation, your application should check the error 1205 to indicate that the transaction was rolled back, and if it's so, restart the transaction.

Note. To reduce the chance of a deadlock, you should minimize the size of transactions and transaction times.

View locks (sp_lock)
Sometimes you need a reference to information about locks. Microsoft recommends using the sp_lock system stored procedure to report locks information. This very useful procedure returns the information about SQL Server process ID, which lock the data, about locked database, about locked table ID, about locked page and about type of locking (locktype column).

This is the example of using the sp_lock system stored procedure:

spid   locktype                            table_id    page        dbname
------ ----------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ---------------
11     Sh_intent                           688005482   0           master
11     Ex_extent                           0           336         tempdb

The information, returned by sp_lock system stored procedure needs in some clarification, because it's difficult to understand database name, object name and index name by their ID numbers.

Check the link below if you need to get user name, host name, database name, index name object name and object owner instead of their ID numbers:
Detailed locking view: sp_lock2

Literature
1. SQL Server Books Online

2. Transaction Isolation Level

3. Locking in SQL Server 6.5

4. Detailed locking view: sp_lock2

5. INF: Analyzing and Avoiding Deadlocks in SQL Server