一、List回顾
List框架图

1、List 是一个接口,它继承于Collection的接口。它代表着有序的队列。
2、 AbstractList 是一个抽象类,它继承于AbstractCollection。AbstractList实现List接口中除size()、get(int location)之外的函数。
3、 AbstractSequentialList 是一个抽象类,它继承于AbstractList。AbstractSequentialList 实现了“链表中,根据index索引值操作链表的全部函数”。
4、ArrayList, LinkedList, Vector, Stack是List的4个实现类。
ArrayList 是一个数组队列,相当于动态数组。它由数组实现,随机访问效率高,随机插入、随机删除效率低。
LinkedList 是一个双向链表。它也可以被当作堆栈、队列或双端队列进行操作。LinkedList随机访问效率低,但随机插入、随机删除效率高。
Vector 是矢量队列,和ArrayList一样,它也是一个动态数组,由数组实现。但是ArrayList是非线程安全的,而Vector是线程安全的。
Stack 是栈,它继承于Vector。它的特性是:先进后出(FILO, First In Last Out)。
二、List使用场景
下面先概括的说明一下各个List的使用场景,后面再分析原因。
如果涉及到“栈”、“队列”、“链表”等操作,应该考虑用List,具体的选择哪个List,根据下面的标准来取舍。
1、对于需要快速插入,删除元素,应该使用LinkedList。
2、 对于需要快速随机访问元素,应该使用ArrayList。
3、 对于“单线程环境” 或者 “多线程环境,但List仅仅只会被单个线程操作”,此时应该使用非同步的类(如ArrayList)。
对于“多线程环境,且List可能同时被多个线程操作”,此时,应该使用同步的类(如Vector)。
通过下面的测试程序,验证上面的1、和2、的结论。参考代码如下:
/**
* 对比ArrayList和LinkedList的插入、随机读取效率、删除的效率
*
* @ClassName: List_test_1
* @author Xingle
* @date 2014-5-29 下午5:25:11
*/
public class List_test_1 {
private static int COUNT_ = 100000;
private static LinkedList<Integer> linkedList = new LinkedList<Integer>();
private static ArrayList<Integer> arraylist = new ArrayList<Integer>();
private static Vector<Integer> vector = new Vector<Integer>();
private static Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<Integer>();
public static void main(String[] args) {
// 插入
insertByPosition(stack);
insertByPosition(linkedList);
insertByPosition(arraylist);
insertByPosition(vector);
// 读取
readByPosition(stack);
readByPosition(linkedList);
readByPosition(arraylist);
readByPosition(vector);
// 删除
deleteByPosition(stack);
deleteByPosition(linkedList);
deleteByPosition(arraylist);
deleteByPosition(vector);
}
/**
* 从list的指定位置删除COUNT个元素,并统计时间
*
* @author xingle
* @data 2014-5-29 下午5:33:55
*/
private static void deleteByPosition(List<Integer> list) {
long start = getCurrentTime();
for (int i = 0; i < COUNT_; i++) {
list.remove(0);
}
long end = getCurrentTime();
long interval = end - start;
System.out.println(getListName(list) + " : delete " + COUNT_
+ " delete "+COUNT_+" elements from the 1st position use time:" + interval
+ " ms");
}
/**
* 根据position,从list中读取元素,并统计时间
*
* @param list
* @author xingle
* @data 2014-5-29 下午5:32:58
*/
private static void readByPosition(List<Integer> list) {
long start = getCurrentTime();
for (int i = 0; i < COUNT_; i++) {
list.get(i);
}
long end = getCurrentTime();
long interval = end - start;
System.out.println(getListName(list) + " : read " + COUNT_
+ " elements by position use time:" + interval
+ " ms");
}
/**
* 向list的指定位置插入COUNT个元素,并统计时间
*
* @param list
* @author xingle
* @data 2014-5-29 下午5:32:16
*/
private static void insertByPosition(List<Integer> list) {
long start = getCurrentTime();
for (int i = 0; i < COUNT_; i++) {
list.add(0, i);
}
long end = getCurrentTime();
long interval = end - start;
System.out.println(getListName(list) + " : insert " + COUNT_
+ " elements into the 1st position use time:" + interval
+ " ms");
}
/**
* 获取list名称
*
* @return
* @author xingle
* @data 2014-5-29 下午5:38:02
*/
private static String getListName(List<Integer> list) {
if (list instanceof LinkedList)
return "LinkedList";
else if (list instanceof ArrayList)
return "ArrayList";
else if (list instanceof Stack)
return "Stack";
else if(list instanceof Vector)
return "Vector";
else
return "List";
}
/**
* 获取当前时间
*
* @return
* @author xingle
* @data 2014-5-29 下午5:35:33
*/
private static long getCurrentTime() {
return System.currentTimeMillis();
}
}
执行结果:
Stack : insert 100000 elements into the 1st position use time:1724 ms
LinkedList : insert 100000 elements into the 1st position use time:31 ms
ArrayList : insert 100000 elements into the 1st position use time:1724 ms
Vector : insert 100000 elements into the 1st position use time:1651 ms
Stack : read 100000 elements by position use time:9 ms
LinkedList : read 100000 elements by position use time:8969 ms
ArrayList : read 100000 elements by position use time:10 ms
Vector : read 100000 elements by position use time:10 ms
Stack : delete 100000 delete 100000 elements from the 1st position use time:2674 ms
LinkedList : delete 100000 delete 100000 elements from the 1st position use time:23 ms
ArrayList : delete 100000 delete 100000 elements from the 1st position use time:2757 ms
Vector : delete 100000 delete 100000 elements from the 1st position use time:2087 ms
从中,我们可以发现:
插入10万个元素,LinkedList所花时间最短:31ms。
删除10万个元素,LinkedList所花时间最短:23ms。
遍历10万个元素,LinkedList所花时间最长:8969 ms;而ArrayList、Stack和Vector则相差不多,都只用了几秒。
考虑到Vector是支持同步的,而Stack又是继承于Vector的;因此,得出结论:
1、对于需要快速插入,删除元素,应该使用LinkedList。
2、 对于需要快速随机访问元素,应该使用ArrayList。
3、 对于“单线程环境” 或者 “多线程环境,但List仅仅只会被单个线程操作”,此时应该使用非同步的类ArrayList。
三、LinkedList和ArrayList性能差异分析
为什么LinkedList中插入元素很快,而ArrayList中插入元素很慢?? LinkedList.java中向指定位置插入元素的代码如下:
/**
* Inserts the specified element at the specified position in this
* list. Shifts the element currently at that position (if any) and
* any subsequent elements to the right (adds one to their indices).
*
* @param index index at which the specified element is to be inserted
* @param element element to be inserted
* @throws IndexOutOfBoundsException {@inheritDoc}
*/
public void add(int index, E element) {
rangeCheckForAdd(index);
ensureCapacityInternal(size + 1); // Increments modCount!!
System.arraycopy(elementData, index, elementData, index + 1,
size - index);
elementData[index] = element;
size++;
}
private void ensureCapacityInternal(int minCapacity) {
if (elementData == EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA) {
minCapacity = Math.max(DEFAULT_CAPACITY, minCapacity);
}
ensureExplicitCapacity(minCapacity);
}
private void ensureExplicitCapacity(int minCapacity) {
modCount++;
// overflow-conscious code
if (minCapacity - elementData.length > 0)
grow(minCapacity);
}
/**
* Increases the capacity to ensure that it can hold at least the
* number of elements specified by the minimum capacity argument.
*
* @param minCapacity the desired minimum capacity
*/
private void grow(int minCapacity) {
// overflow-conscious code
int oldCapacity = elementData.length;
int newCapacity = oldCapacity + (oldCapacity >> 1);
if (newCapacity - minCapacity < 0)
newCapacity = minCapacity;
if (newCapacity - MAX_ARRAY_SIZE > 0)
newCapacity = hugeCapacity(minCapacity);
// minCapacity is usually close to size, so this is a win:
elementData = Arrays.copyOf(elementData, newCapacity);
}
private static int hugeCapacity(int minCapacity) {
if (minCapacity < 0) // overflow
throw new OutOfMemoryError();
return (minCapacity > MAX_ARRAY_SIZE) ?
Integer.MAX_VALUE :
MAX_ARRAY_SIZE;
}
public static <T,U> T[] copyOf(U[] original, int newLength, Class<? extends T[]> newType) {
T[] copy = ((Object)newType == (Object)Object[].class)
? (T[]) new Object[newLength]
: (T[]) Array.newInstance(newType.getComponentType(), newLength);
System.arraycopy(original, 0, copy, 0,
Math.min(original.length, newLength));
return copy;
}
ensureCapacity(size+1) 的作用是“确认ArrayList的容量,若容量不够,则增加容量。”
真正耗时的操作是 System.arraycopy(elementData, index, elementData, index + 1, size - index);
Sun JDK包的java/lang/System.java中的arraycopy()声明如下:
public static native void arraycopy(Object src, int srcPos, Object dest, int destPos, int length);
arraycopy()是个JNI函数,它是在JVM中实现的。sunJDK中看不到源码,不过可以在OpenJDK包中看到的源码。网上有对arraycopy()的分析说明,请参考:System.arraycopy源码分析
实际上,System.arraycopy(elementData, index, elementData, index + 1, size - index); 会移动index之后所有元素即可。这就意味着,ArrayList的add(int index, E element)函数,会引起index之后所有元素的改变!
通过上面的分析,我们就能理解为什么LinkedList中插入元素很快,而ArrayList中插入元素很慢。
“删除元素”与“插入元素”的原理类似,这里就不再过多说明。
“为什么LinkedList中随机访问很慢,而ArrayList中随机访问很快”。先看看LinkedList随机访问的代码
/**
* Returns the element at the specified position in this list.
*
* @param index index of the element to return
* @return the element at the specified position in this list
* @throws IndexOutOfBoundsException {@inheritDoc}
*/
public E get(int index) {
checkElementIndex(index);
return node(index).item;
}
/**
* Returns the (non-null) Node at the specified element index.
*/
Node<E> node(int index) {
// assert isElementIndex(index);
if (index < (size >> 1)) {
Node<E> x = first;
for (int i = 0; i < index; i++)
x = x.next;
return x;
} else {
Node<E> x = last;
for (int i = size - 1; i > index; i--)
x = x.prev;
return x;
}
}
private static class Node<E> {
E item;
Node<E> next;
Node<E> prev;
Node(Node<E> prev, E element, Node<E> next) {
this.item = element;
this.next = next;
this.prev = prev;
}
}
从中,可以看出:通过get(int index)获取LinkedList第index个元素时。先在双向链表中找到index位置的元素;找到之后再返回。
双向链表查找index位置的节点时,有一个加速动作:若index < 双向链表长度的1/2,则从前向后查找; 否则,从后向前查找。
下面看看ArrayList随机访问的代码 :
/**
* Returns the element at the specified position in this list.
*
* @param index index of the element to return
* @return the element at the specified position in this list
* @throws IndexOutOfBoundsException {@inheritDoc}
*/
public E get(int index) {
rangeCheck(index);
return elementData(index);
}
// Positional Access Operations
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
E elementData(int index) {
return (E) elementData[index];
}
通过get(int index)获取ArrayList第index个元素时。直接返回数组中index位置的元素,而不需要像LinkedList一样进行查找。
四、Vector和ArrayList比较
相同之处
1、它们都是List
2、它们都实现了RandomAccess和Cloneable接口
3、 它们都是通过数组实现的,本质上都是动态数组
4 、它们的默认数组容量是10
5 、它们都支持Iterator和listIterator遍历
相同之处
1 它们都是List:它们都继承于AbstractList,并且实现List接口。
ArrayList和Vector的类定义如下:
// ArrayList的定义
public class ArrayList<E> extends AbstractList<E>
implements List<E>, RandomAccess, Cloneable, java.io.Serializable
// Vector的定义
public class Vector<E>
extends AbstractList<E>
implements List<E>, RandomAccess, Cloneable, java.io.Serializable
2、它们都实现了RandomAccess和Cloneable接口
实现RandomAccess接口,意味着它们都支持快速随机访问;
实现Cloneable接口,意味着它们能克隆自己。
3 、它们都是通过数组实现的,本质上都是动态数组
ArrayList.java中定义数组elementData用于保存元素
/**
* The array buffer into which the elements of the ArrayList are stored.
* The capacity of the ArrayList is the length of this array buffer. Any
* empty ArrayList with elementData == EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA will be expanded to
* DEFAULT_CAPACITY when the first element is added.
*/
private transient Object[] elementData;
Vector.java中也定义了数组elementData用于保存元素
/**
* The array buffer into which the components of the vector are
* stored. The capacity of the vector is the length of this array buffer,
* and is at least large enough to contain all the vector's elements.
*
* <p>Any array elements following the last element in the Vector are null.
*
* @serial
*/
protected Object[] elementData;
4 它们的默认数组容量是10
若创建ArrayList或Vector时,没指定容量大小;则使用默认容量大小10。
ArrayList的默认构造函数如下:
/**
* Constructs an empty list with an initial capacity of ten.
*/
public ArrayList() {
super();
this.elementData = EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA;
}
/**
* Default initial capacity.
*/
private static final int DEFAULT_CAPACITY = 10;
Vector的默认构造函数如下:
/**
* Constructs an empty vector so that its internal data array
* has size {@code 10} and its standard capacity increment is
* zero.
*/
public Vector() {
this(10);
}
5 、它们都支持Iterator和listIterator遍历
它们都继承于AbstractList,而AbstractList中分别实现了 “iterator()接口返回Iterator迭代器” 和 “listIterator()返回ListIterator迭代器”。
不同之处
1 、线程安全性不一样
2 、对序列化支持不同
3、 构造函数个数不同
4 、容量增加方式不同
5 、对Enumeration的支持不同。Vector支持通过Enumeration去遍历,而List不支持
1 、线程安全性不一样
ArrayList是非线程安全,用于单线程;而Vector是线程安全的,它的函数是synchronized的,即都是支持同步的,用于多线程。
2 、对序列化支持不同
ArrayList支持序列化,而Vector不支持;即ArrayList有实现java.io.Serializable接口,而Vector没有实现该接口。
3 、构造函数个数不同
ArrayList有3个构造函数,而Vector有4个构造函数。Vector除了包括和ArrayList类似的3个构造函数之外,另外的一个构造函数可以指定容量增加系数。
ArrayList的构造函数如下:
/**
* capacity是ArrayList的默认容量大小。当由于增加数据导致容量不足时,容量会添加上一次容量大小的一半
* Constructs an empty list with the specified initial capacity.
*
* @param initialCapacity the initial capacity of the list
* @throws IllegalArgumentException if the specified initial capacity
* is negative
*/
public ArrayList(int initialCapacity) {
super();
if (initialCapacity < 0)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Illegal Capacity: "+
initialCapacity);
this.elementData = new Object[initialCapacity];
}
/**
* 默认构造函数
* Constructs an empty list with an initial capacity of ten.
*/
public ArrayList() {
super();
this.elementData = EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA;
}
/**
* Constructs a list containing the elements of the specified
* collection, in the order they are returned by the collection's
* iterator.
*
* @param c the collection whose elements are to be placed into this list
* @throws NullPointerException if the specified collection is null
*/
public ArrayList(Collection<? extends E> c) {
elementData = c.toArray();
size = elementData.length;
// c.toArray might (incorrectly) not return Object[] (see 6260652)
if (elementData.getClass() != Object[].class)
elementData = Arrays.copyOf(elementData, size, Object[].class);
}
Vector的构造函数如下:
/**
* Constructs an empty vector with the specified initial capacity and
* capacity increment.
*
* @param initialCapacity the initial capacity of the vector
* @param capacityIncrement the amount by which the capacity is
* increased when the vector overflows
* @throws IllegalArgumentException if the specified initial capacity
* is negative
*/
public Vector(int initialCapacity, int capacityIncrement) {
super();
if (initialCapacity < 0)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Illegal Capacity: "+
initialCapacity);
this.elementData = new Object[initialCapacity];
this.capacityIncrement = capacityIncrement;
}
/**
* Constructs an empty vector with the specified initial capacity and
* with its capacity increment equal to zero.
*
* @param initialCapacity the initial capacity of the vector
* @throws IllegalArgumentException if the specified initial capacity
* is negative
*/
public Vector(int initialCapacity) {
this(initialCapacity, 0);
}
/**
* Constructs an empty vector so that its internal data array
* has size {@code 10} and its standard capacity increment is
* zero.
*/
public Vector() {
this(10);
}
/**
* Constructs a vector containing the elements of the specified
* collection, in the order they are returned by the collection's
* iterator.
*
* @param c the collection whose elements are to be placed into this
* vector
* @throws NullPointerException if the specified collection is null
* @since 1.2
*/
public Vector(Collection<? extends E> c) {
elementData = c.toArray();
elementCount = elementData.length;
// c.toArray might (incorrectly) not return Object[] (see 6260652)
if (elementData.getClass() != Object[].class)
elementData = Arrays.copyOf(elementData, elementCount, Object[].class);
}
4 、容量增加方式不同
逐个添加元素时,若ArrayList容量不足时,新的容量扩大1.5倍。
ArrayList中容量增长的主要函数如下:
/**
* Increases the capacity to ensure that it can hold at least the
* number of elements specified by the minimum capacity argument.
*
* @param minCapacity the desired minimum capacity
*/
private void grow(int minCapacity) {
// overflow-conscious code
int oldCapacity = elementData.length;
int newCapacity = oldCapacity + (oldCapacity >> 1);//对容量扩大1.5倍
if (newCapacity - minCapacity < 0)
newCapacity = minCapacity;
if (newCapacity - MAX_ARRAY_SIZE > 0)
newCapacity = hugeCapacity(minCapacity);
// minCapacity is usually close to size, so this is a win:
elementData = Arrays.copyOf(elementData, newCapacity);
}
Vector中容量增长的主要函数如下:
在进行动态扩容时,Vector的新容量大小为原有容量加上capacityIncrement,如果这个数不大于0,则扩容为原始容量的2倍。
private void grow(int minCapacity) {
// overflow-conscious code
int oldCapacity = elementData.length;
int newCapacity = oldCapacity + ((capacityIncrement > 0) ?
capacityIncrement : oldCapacity);
if (newCapacity - minCapacity < 0)
newCapacity = minCapacity;
if (newCapacity - MAX_ARRAY_SIZE > 0)
newCapacity = hugeCapacity(minCapacity);
elementData = Arrays.copyOf(elementData, newCapacity);
}
5 对Enumeration的支持不同。Vector支持通过Enumeration去遍历,而List不支持
Vector中实现Enumeration的代码如下:
/**
* Returns an enumeration of the components of this vector. The
* returned {@code Enumeration} object will generate all items in
* this vector. The first item generated is the item at index {@code 0},
* then the item at index {@code 1}, and so on.
*
* @return an enumeration of the components of this vector
* @see Iterator
*/
public Enumeration<E> elements() {
return new Enumeration<E>() {
int count = 0;
public boolean hasMoreElements() {
return count < elementCount;
}
public E nextElement() {
synchronized (Vector.this) {
if (count < elementCount) {
return elementData(count++);
}
}
throw new NoSuchElementException("Vector Enumeration");
}
};
}

1662

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



