Development of missile and radar technology to solve China's social problems

Development of missile and radar technology to solve China’s social problems

To be honest, a glance at social problems may not have much to do with the development of missile radar. The development of the military industry has played a negligible role in promoting the progress of social science. I want to leave it at the end of the article to talk about this interwoven relationship, and I want to start by talking about China’s missile and radar development.

The development of military science and technology has always been developed in the contradiction between attack and defense, contradiction and shield, sword and armor, shelled tail piercing shell and composite, reactive armor, and of course missiles and radar.

Missiles and radars are still something new. They were put into actual use less than 100 years ago during world war ii, and developed rapidly as a deterrent in the cold war between the Soviet Union and the United States. However, China started relatively late. In 1960, China successfully test-fired its first missile df-1, which was still based on the imitation of the Soviet union’s P/ R-2 missile (the prototype was Germany’s V-2 missile). [1] The first naval radar station was completed in 1951. [2]So now, what extent our missile and radar have developed to，which can be felt roughly from a few examples, with the suspicion of generalization, but just to have a whole only actually feeling and understanding. Of course, I am not an expert, but also just hearsay. If there is inaccurate place, please forgive me.

First, missiles. I would like to take the df-26 as an example to see what China’s very advanced missiles look like. “Df-26 ballistic missile ballistic missile is China’s first generation of liquid product of upgrading, is the new generation of remote solid fuel ballistic missiles, nuclear capabilities, and have the ability to hit the large surface ships, the biggest can reach 3000 to 4000 kilometers, covering even Diego Garcia island, Guam, and can realize high speed end penetration, Mach number 18 has given China a reliable hit the second island chain fixed target and large vessels such as ability.”[3] It is worth noting that the terminal guidance capability of the missile endow it with certain orbit shifting capability, and the terminal penetration speed up to Mach 18 make it very difficult to intercept it. At the same time it was designed to hit the “large surface ships”, the combination of these two makes it is difficult to really have the ability to make any enemy countries to offshore in China. Especially the country with the carrier of the putative foe, its carrier battle group can only appear in the fighter combat radius without refueling support, this is the meaning of a great.

Then there is radar. I think the most representative radar should be anti-stealth radar and 055 destroyer equipped with active dual-band radar. The comprehensive radar network, including DWL-002 passive radar detection system, JY-27A anti-air warning meter-wave radar system, passive monitoring passive signal analysis system and other models, has formed a strict anti-stealth radar network and is capable of forming a detection network in the range of 500km for the first island chain.[4] The newly launched type 055 destroyer in China is also equipped with active phased array radar working in s-band and dual-band radar of active phased array radar working in x-band. This makes our country destroyer prevention and control ability rose a class, it is great progress.

As I write here, it may still be unclear how these advances in military technology relate to social problems. I hope everybody can have the impression that China’s military technology is not bad, is capable of maintaining national security and stability, and economic power as a work in progress. This is the social significance of military progress, and this is the feedback and influence on the society after the advanced radar missile.

What is the current international environment? The United States wants to use trade barriers to force the manufacturing industry of the real economy to transfer back to the United States, and fight a trade war. Globalization has entered a difficult period that has never been encountered before. Europe is mired in its own debt and refugee problems; Japan’s Abenomics has not improved much over the years; China’s economy is slowing. Conflicts in the Middle East, in particular, have added to instability. It can be seen that the current international situation is extremely complex and chaotic. No one can really see clearly what will happen next. The military is the country, in this kind of chaos, last method to protect its independence, and the interests of the country all rely on it. I really appreciate the analysis made by professor Chen ping of Fudan university. He once said, "because China has built an independent industrial system, a scientific and technological system and a national defense system in the past 30 years, China’s financial policies are more independent than those of Germany and Japan. " China’s independence is based on military independence, and this is the foundation of China’s social stability, and this is the social problem it really solves.

However, a more difficult social problem than this one is that the people lack a complete understanding of both China and foreign countries. This is the most worrying point. Well I think there’s a phrase Zheng Ruolin said: "to really know he needs to have a heads up the western point of view, to be counted up the west, we can neither like Qing dynasty contempt for the west, the western everything as exotic curiosity-a solution looking, but we can’t look up the west, and all of western cult. " That’s easy to say, but hard to do. Since the start of a trade war, the collapse of stocks as a barometer of confidence is a clear sign of a lack of confidence. Others blame the film for showing China’s fickleness and arrogance, breaking with its policy of concealment and allowing the United States to crack down on us. Is this almost absurd lack of a historical perspective an objective look at the west? Our bottom line is this: no matter how weak, no country can control us. We will be independent forever. There should be a clearer understanding of this among the people, shouldn’t there? This kind of strong military capability is the only way to get us out of the shadow of the galactic incident, the Yugoslav “bomb embassy” and the Taiwan strait crisis. In this world, the equality of international relations is based on the equality of force. Only money is not enough. Even though the Qing dynasty ranked first in GDP, it could not avoid the fate of being plundered by powerful countries.

Chairman MAO said: “you hit yours, I hit mine, throw away illusions, ready to fight.” I sincerely hope that the Chinese people can fully realize the strength of their motherland. We should not feel that without force, we can hide our strength. Times have changed. Now is the time to let go of illusions and prepare for battle.

Reference：
[1]https://baike.baidu.com/item/东风1弹道导弹
[2]https://zhidao.baidu.com/question/2053209670127485187.html?qbl=relate_question_0&word=�й��ĵ�һ���״�ʲôʱ��
[3]https://baike.baidu.com/item/东风26弹道导弹/22230685?fr=aladdin
[4]https://baike.baidu.com/item/反隐身雷达/15859524?fr=aladdin
• The translation copyright belongs to Youdao Dictionary