当心外部连接中的ON子句

       在SQL tuning中，不良写法导致SQL执行效率比比皆是。最近的SQL tuning中一个外部连接写法不当导致过SQL执行时间超过15分钟左右此即
为一例。通过修正该SQL的写法之后，过高的逻辑读呈数量级下降以及SQL语句执行时间也大幅下降。下面给出一个列子来演示该情形。

一、创建演示环境

-->当前数据库版本 SQL> select * from v$version where rownum<2; BANNER ---------------------------------------------------------------- Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod -->创建演示表并插入记录 SQL> create table t as select empno,ename,job,sal,deptno 2 from emp where 1=2; SQL> insert into t select empno,ename,job,sal,deptno 2 from emp e where empno=(select max(empno) from emp where deptno=e.deptno); SQL> insert into t(empno,ename,job,sal) values(8888,'ROBINSON','DBA',2000); SQL> insert into t(empno,ename,job,sal) values(9999,'JACKSON','CLERK',2500); SQL> commit; SQL> analyze table t compute statistics; SQL> select * from t; EMPNO ENAME JOB SAL DEPTNO ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------- 7934 MILLER CLERK 1300 10 7902 FORD ANALYST 3000 20 7900 JAMES CLERK 950 30 8888 ROBINSON DBA 2000 9999 JACKSON CLERK 2500 -->使用left join连接查看数据，此时表t中所有记录被返回 SQL> select empno,ename,sal,dname from t left join dept d on t.deptno=d.deptno; EMPNO ENAME SAL DNAME ---------- ---------- ---------- -------------- 7934 MILLER 1300 ACCOUNTING 7902 FORD 3000 RESEARCH 7900 JAMES 950 SALES 8888 ROBINSON 2000 9999 JACKSON 2500 -->下面同样是使用left join连接，但在on子句中增加了过滤条件t.sal>=2000 -->从下面的返回结果可知，t.sal>=2000子句并没有过滤掉sal小于2000的记录 SQL> select empno,ename,sal,dname from t left join dept d -->简称语句A 2 on(t.deptno=d.deptno and t.sal>=2000); EMPNO ENAME SAL DNAME ---------- ---------- ---------- -------------- 7934 MILLER 1300 7902 FORD 3000 RESEARCH 7900 JAMES 950 8888 ROBINSON 2000 9999 JACKSON 2500 -->使用left join连接，将过滤条件放到where 子句中 -->此时仅仅t.sal>=2000且符合t.deptno=d.deptno的记录被返回(结果与所期望一致) SQL> select empno,ename,sal,dname from t left join dept d -->简称语句B 2 on t.deptno=d.deptno where t.sal>=2000; EMPNO ENAME SAL DNAME ---------- ---------- ---------- -------------- 7902 FORD 3000 RESEARCH 8888 ROBINSON 2000 9999 JACKSON 2500 -->查看执行计划 SQL> set autotrace traceonly exp; -->语句A(过滤条件位于on 子句中的情形)的执行计划 SQL> select empno,ename,sal,dname from t left join dept d 2 (on t.deptno=d.deptno and t.sal>=2000); Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 2195752858 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 5 | 120 | 6 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 1 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 5 | 120 | 6 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T | 5 | 70 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 3 | VIEW | | 1 | 10 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DEPT | 1 | 13 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 5 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_DEPT | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 5 - access("T"."DEPTNO"="D"."DEPTNO") -->重点关注这里的谓词信息,两个过滤条件合在一起 filter("T"."DEPTNO" IS NOT NULL AND "T"."SAL">=2000) -->从执行计划来看位于第5步为INDEX UNIQUE SCAN Statistics ---------------------------------------------------------- 0 recursive calls 0 db block gets 11 consistent gets -->此时的逻辑读为11 0 physical reads 0 redo size 696 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 0 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 5 rows processed -->语句B(将谓词信息置于到where子句中的情形)的执行计划 SQL> select empno,ename,sal,dname from t left join dept d 2 on t.deptno=d.deptno where t.sal>=2000; Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 832694258 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 3 | 81 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 1 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 3 | 81 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DEPT | 1 | 13 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 4 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_DEPT | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 2 - filter("T"."SAL">=2000) -->此时的谓词信息分为两部分，"T"."SAL">=2000位于第二步 4 - access("T"."DEPTNO"="D"."DEPTNO"(+)) -->此条谓词信息用于实现表连接 Statistics ---------------------------------------------------------- 0 recursive calls 0 db block gets 10 consistent gets -->此时的逻辑读为10，由于2 - filter("T"."SAL">=2000)过滤后，内部循环少执行了一次 0 physical reads 0 redo size 658 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 0 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 3 rows processed /**************************************************/ /* Author: Robinson Cheng */ /* Blog: http://blog.csdn.net/robinson_0612 */ /* MSN: robinson_0612@hotmail.com */ /* QQ: 645746311 */ /**************************************************/ -->从上面的观察中发现上述两条SQL语句执行计划并非最佳，存在改良的余地 -->由于是nested loops outer,因此考虑在表t的谓词列增加索引以快速过滤记录 SQL> create index i_t_sal on t(sal); SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('SCOTT','T',cascade=>true); -->增加索引后两个语句的执行情况 -->语句A的执行计划以及统计信息没有发生任何变化 SQL> select empno,ename,sal,dname from t left join dept d 2 on (t.deptno=d.deptno and t.sal>=2000); Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 2195752858 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 5 | 140 | 6 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 1 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 5 | 140 | 6 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T | 5 | 90 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 3 | VIEW | | 1 | 10 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DEPT | 1 | 13 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 5 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_DEPT | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 5 - access("T"."DEPTNO"="D"."DEPTNO") filter("T"."DEPTNO" IS NOT NULL AND "T"."SAL">=2000) Statistics ---------------------------------------------------------- 1 recursive calls 0 db block gets 11 consistent gets 0 physical reads 0 redo size 696 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 0 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 5 rows processed -->语句B的执行计划发生变化，原来的全表扫描变为索引扫描 SQL> select empno,ename,sal,dname from t left join dept d 2 on t.deptno=d.deptno where t.sal>=2000; Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 2452308905 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 3 | 93 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 1 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 3 | 93 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 3 | 54 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_T_SAL | 3 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DEPT | 1 | 13 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 5 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_DEPT | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 3 - access("T"."SAL">=2000) 5 - access("T"."DEPTNO"="D"."DEPTNO"(+)) Statistics ---------------------------------------------------------- 1 recursive calls 0 db block gets 6 consistent gets -->逻辑读也由10下降到6 0 physical reads 0 redo size 658 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 0 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 3 rows processed

二、总结
  1、尽可能避免SQL不良写法导致的不良后果
  2、此例中由于将谓词信息放到ON子句中，在数据量庞大的表(百万行)连接中，则该写法导致过多的物理和逻辑I/O,使得中间结果集庞大
  3、谓词信息放到ON子句中同时也导致索引失效
  4、尽可能的在满足需求的情况下减小中间结果集

三、更多参考

父游标、子游标及共享游标

绑定变量及其优缺点

dbms_xplan之display_cursor函数的使用

dbms_xplan之display函数的使用

执行计划中各字段各模块描述

使用 EXPLAIN PLAN 获取SQL语句执行计划

启用 AUTOTRACE 功能

函数使得索引列失效

Oracle 绑定变量窥探

Oracle 自适应共享游标 

Oracle ROWID 

收缩表段(shrink space)

临时表空间的管理与受损恢复  

Oracle 彻底 kill session 

Oracle 硬解析与软解析

共享池的调整与优化(Shared pool Tuning)

Buffer cache 的调整与优化(一)

Buffer cache 的调整与优化(二) 

Oracle 表缓存(caching table)的使用

PGA的设置与调整

 

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/ajuanabc/archive/2012/01/05/2462769.html