克里1971年的反战演讲:“你怎么能够要求最后一个人为一个错误的政策去死?”

原创 2004年08月11日 15:30:00

想不到当年克里也是反战运动的一员,看看下面演讲中的这句“你怎么能够要求最后一个人为一个错误的政策去死”,看看,多有型!

How Do You Ask a Man to Be the Last Man to Die in Vietnam?
By John Kerry


Following is the statement John Kerry made before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 23, 1971.

I would like to talk on behalf of all those veterans and say that several months ago in Detroit we had an investigation at which over 150 honorably discharged, and many very highly decorated, veterans testified to war crimes committed in Southeast Asia. These were not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command. It is impossible to describe to you exactly what did happen in Detroit - the emotions in the room and the feelings of the men who were reliving their experiences in Vietnam. They relived the absolute horror of what this country, in a sense, made them do.

They told stories that at times they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Ghengis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war and the normal and very particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country.

We call this investigation the Winter Soldier Investigation. The term Winter Soldier is a play on words of Thomas Paine's in 1776 when he spoke of the Sunshine Patriots and summertime soldiers who deserted at Valley Forge because the going was rough.

We who have come here to Washington have come here because we feel we have to be winter soldiers now. We could come back to this country, we could be quiet, we could hold our silence, we could not tell what went on in Vietnam, but we feel because of what threatens this country, not the reds, but the crimes which we are committing that threaten it, that we have to speak out....

In our opinion and from our experience, there is nothing in South Vietnam which could happen that realistically threatens the United States of America. And to attempt to justify the loss of one American life in Vietnam, Cambodia or Laos by linking such loss to the preservation of freedom, which those misfits supposedly abuse, is to us the height of criminal hypocrisy, and it is that kind of hypocrisy which we feel has torn this country apart.

We found that not only was it a civil war, an effort by a people who had for years been seeking their liberation from any colonial influence whatsoever, but also we found that the Vietnamese whom we had enthusiastically molded after our own image were hard put to take up the fight against the threat we were supposedly saving them from.

We found most people didn't even know the difference between communism and democracy. They only wanted to work in rice paddies without helicopters strafing them and bombs with napalm burning their villages and tearing their country apart. They wanted everything to do with the war, particularly with this foreign presence of the United States of America, to leave them alone in peace, and they practiced the art of survival by siding with whichever military force was present at a particular time, be it Viet Cong, North Vietnamese or American.

We found also that all too often American men were dying in those rice paddies for want of support from their allies. We saw first hand how monies from American taxes were used for a corrupt dictatorial regime. We saw that many people in this country had a one-sided idea of who was kept free by the flag, and blacks provided the highest percentage of casualties. We saw Vietnam ravaged equally by American bombs and search and destroy missions, as well as by Viet Cong terrorism - and yet we listened while this country tried to blame all of the havoc on the Viet Cong.

We rationalized destroying villages in order to save them. We saw America lose her sense of morality as she accepted very coolly a My Lai and refused to give up the image of American soldiers who hand out chocolate bars and chewing gum.

We learned the meaning of free fire zones, shooting anything that moves, and we watched while America placed a cheapness on the lives of orientals.

We watched the United States falsification of body counts, in fact the glorification of body counts. We listened while month after month we were told the back of the enemy was about to break. We fought using weapons against "oriental human beings." We fought using weapons against those people which I do not believe this country would dream of using were we fighting in the European theater. We watched while men charged up hills because a general said that hill has to be taken, and after losing one platoon or two platoons they marched away to leave the hill for reoccupation by the North Vietnamese. We watched pride allow the most unimportant battles to be blown into extravaganzas, because we couldn't lose, and we couldn't retreat, and because it didn't matter how many American bodies were lost to prove that point, and so there were Hamburger Hills and Khe Sanhs and Hill 81s and Fire Base 6s, and so many others.

Now we are told that the men who fought there must watch quietly while American lives are lost so that we can exercise the incredible arrogance of Vietnamizing the Vietnamese.

Each day to facilitate the process by which the United States washes her hands of Vietnam someone has to give up his life so that the United States doesn't have to admit something that the entire world already knows, so that we can't say that we have made a mistake. Someone has to die so that President Nixon won't be, and these are his words, "the first President to lose a war."

We are asking Americans to think about that because how do you ask a man to be the last man to die in Vietnam? How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?....We are here in Washington to say that the problem of this war is not just a question of war and diplomacy. It is part and parcel of everything that we are trying as human beings to communicate to people in this country - the question of racism which is rampant in the military, and so many other questions such as the use of weapons; the hypocrisy in our taking umbrage at the Geneva Conventions and using that as justification for a continuation of this war when we are more guilty than any other body of violations of those Geneva Conventions; in the use of free fire zones, harassment interdiction fire, search and destroy missions, the bombings, the torture of prisoners, all accepted policy by many units in South Vietnam. That is what we are trying to say. It is part and parcel of everything.

An American Indian friend of mine who lives in the Indian Nation of Alcatraz put it to me very succinctly. He told me how as a boy on an Indian reservation he had watched television and he used to cheer the cowboys when they came in and shot the Indians, and then suddenly one day he stopped in Vietnam and he said, "my God, I am doing to these people the very same thing that was done to my people," and he stopped. And that is what we are trying to say, that we think this thing has to end.

We are here to ask, and we are here to ask vehemently, where are the leaders of our country? Where is the leadership? We're here to ask where are McNamara, Rostow, Bundy, Gilpatrick, and so many others? Where are they now that we, the men they sent off to war, have returned? These are the commanders who have deserted their troops. And there is no more serious crime in the laws of war. The Army says they never leave their wounded. The marines say they never even leave their dead. These men have left all the casualties and retreated behind a pious shield of public rectitude. They've left the real stuff of their reputations bleaching behind them in the sun in this country....

We wish that a merciful God could wipe away our own memories of that service as easily as this administration has wiped away their memories of us. But all that they have done and all that they can do by this denial is to make more clear than ever our own determination to undertake one last mission - to search out and destroy the last vestige of this barbaric war, to pacify our own hearts, to conquer the hate and fear that have driven this country these last ten years and more. And more. And so when thirty years from now our brothers go down the street without a leg, without an arm, or a face, and small boys ask why, we will be able to say "Vietnam" and not mean a desert, not a filthy obscene memory, but mean instead where America finally turned and where soldiers like us helped it in the turning.

原文地址:http://themoderntribune.com/john_kerry_on_last_man_to_die_in_viet_nam_sppech_1971_opposing_viet_nam_war_iraq_war_2004_us_presidential_candidate_george_bush.htm

克里1971年的反战演讲:“你怎么能够要求最后一个人为一个错误的政策去死?”

想不到当年克里也是反战运动的一员,看看下面演讲中的这句“你怎么能够要求最后一个人为一个错误的政策去死”,看看,多有型!How Do You Ask a Man to Be the Last Man t...
  • asign
  • asign
  • 2004-08-11 15:30:00
  • 1267

英国前首相布莱尔东莞演讲 费用超1000万(图)

 核心提示:英国前首相布莱尔6日在东莞进行演讲。据透露,虽然布莱尔只在东莞逗留3个小时,但其出场费、高规格酒宴等花费,总共用去1000多万元。  布莱尔下午4时30分到达东莞,晚上7时30分离开。据透...
  • szsbell
  • szsbell
  • 2007-11-07 12:06:00
  • 647

如果一个男人为你流泪!请珍惜(转)

如果有个男孩为你哭,请拉住他的手,他真的可以陪你走完一生。  一个朋友告诉我,他哭了,为了一个女孩。  “你一定很爱很爱她吧。”  “是爱到不知道怎么办才好。”  “是吗?  男孩在你面前哭说明他已经...
  • feixeyes
  • feixeyes
  • 2008-10-13 22:03:00
  • 1505

《一个叫欧维的男人决定去死》读后感

《一个叫欧维的男人决定去死》第51本闲书 ​,本周读书计划提前完成,许久读书没有这么大情绪波动了!在二十几岁的年纪,​​​书里都会遇到那个相伴一生的人,再去陪伴四十几年,这是欧维自杀的回忆录,一次次的...
  • dxd5862
  • dxd5862
  • 2018-01-10 22:44:54
  • 278

柔性政策

当你年轻的时候。 不让你怀疑。 不让你接触更好的。 控制你的人口数量。 不让你快乐。 始终为了自己的利益,把你卡在那里。 不让你丢掉过去,去更大的世界,去更广阔的世界。 你看,我很好啊。我似乎对你...
  • maqingqing1992
  • maqingqing1992
  • 2015-05-17 12:38:28
  • 1105

你让一些人为你工作了七天,你要用一根金条作为报酬。金条被分成七小块,每天给出一块。 如果你只能将金条切割两次,你怎样分给这些工人?

你让一些人为你工作了七天,你要用一根金条作为报酬。金条被分成七小块,每天给出一块。 如果你只能将金条切割两次,你怎样分给这些工人? 答案: 1、2、4...
  • huangxiaominglipeng
  • huangxiaominglipeng
  • 2016-10-13 19:29:46
  • 681

克里斯多夫·弗拉沃斯:大多数比特…

比特币社区希望比特币这种数字货币有一天能够成为全球货币的选择。然而,这可能不会在短期内实现。首先,比特币无论从应用范围还是技术发展方面都还有很长的路要走。虽然听起来有点牵强,但最终比特币会走到这一步。...
  • qq53016353
  • qq53016353
  • 2016-04-18 22:14:29
  • 160

你让工人为你工作7天,回报是一根金条.....

1.你让工人为你工作7天,回报是一根金条,这个金条平分成相连的7段,你必须在每天结束的时候给他们一段金条。如果只允许你两次把金条弄断,你如何给你的工人付费? 答案: 编号(1、2)( 3...
  • fjseryi
  • fjseryi
  • 2013-10-12 16:32:30
  • 4332

定义栈的数据结构,要求添加一个min函数,能够得到栈的最小元素。o(1)空间的代码实现

2.设计包含min函数的栈(栈) 定义栈的数据结构,要求添加一个min函数,能够得到栈的最小元素。 要求函数min、push以及pop的时间复杂度都是O(1)。 参考了http://blog...
  • lihappy999
  • lihappy999
  • 2012-02-26 20:06:11
  • 4316

乔布斯斯坦福毕业演讲

纽约:我非常荣幸能够
  • u011915301
  • u011915301
  • 2014-05-01 20:19:03
  • 592
收藏助手
不良信息举报
您举报文章:克里1971年的反战演讲:“你怎么能够要求最后一个人为一个错误的政策去死?”
举报原因:
原因补充:

(最多只允许输入30个字)