这个问题的思路就是,通过后序遍历找到头结点,然后在中序遍历中划分子树, 再对子树执行相同的操作,直至子树为空。
而我之前的方法是在细节上比较粗(wu)暴(nao) 因此效率过于低下。
更详细的过程就是,根据后序遍历找到头结点,再在中序遍历中划分子树,而根据中序遍历中划分的子树大小,又可以作为偏移量来对后序遍历中的结点做划分。然后再对这一子树执行之前的操作。
我的代码是:
TreeNode* buildTree (vector<int> &inorder, vector<int> &postorder)
{
if (inorder.empty ()) {
return nullptr;
}
unordered_map<int, INTVECIT> inItDic;
unordered_map<int, INTVECIT> postItDic;
for (auto it = inorder.begin(); it != inorder.end(); ++it){
inItDic[*it] = it;
}
for (auto it = postorder.begin(); it != postorder.end(); ++it){
postItDic[*it] = it;
}
auto rootVal = postorder.back ();
auto root = new TreeNode (rootVal);
auto rootIt = inItDic[rootVal];
function<void(TreeNode*, INTVECIT, INTVECIT)> build;
build = [&] (TreeNode *subRoot, INTVECIT begin, INTVECIT end)
{
if (begin == end) {
return;
}
set<INTVECIT> weights;
for (auto it = begin; it != end; ++it) {
weights.insert (postItDic[*it]);
}
auto newSubRootVal = **weights.crbegin ();
auto newSubRoot = new TreeNode (newSubRootVal);
if (newSubRootVal < subRoot->val) {
subRoot->left = newSubRoot;
}
else {
subRoot->right = newSubRoot;
}
auto newSubRootIt = inItDic[newSubRootVal];
build (newSubRoot, begin, newSubRootIt);
build (newSubRoot, newSubRootIt + 1, end);
};
build (root, inorder.begin(), rootIt);
build (root, rootIt + 1, inorder.end());
return root;
}
运行时间多久? 2.67s 我可是自认挺好了, 毕竟我刚写好代码的时候可是运行了 20s+
可是 leetcode 并不认同,我就崩溃了,卧槽这都超时?两秒半也超时? 你特么在逗我!
直到在知乎上,一位好心前辈给了我一个解答,还就在我的代码基础上改的:
TreeNode* buildTree (vector<int> &inorder, vector<int> &postorder)
{
using IndexType = vector<int>::size_type;
if (inorder.empty () || postorder.empty() || inorder.size() != postorder.size()) {
return nullptr;
}
unordered_map<int, int> inIndexDic;
for (auto i = 0; i < inorder.size(); ++i) {
inIndexDic[inorder[i]] = i;
}
function<TreeNode*(IndexType, IndexType, IndexType, IndexType)> build;
build = [&] (IndexType inBegin, IndexType inEnd, IndexType postBegin, IndexType postEnd) -> TreeNode*
{
if (inBegin == inEnd) {
return nullptr;
}
IndexType newRootIndex = inIndexDic[postorder[postEnd - 1]];
IndexType leftSize = newRootIndex - inBegin;
IndexType rightSize = inEnd - newRootIndex - 1;
auto newRoot = new TreeNode(inorder[newRootIndex]);
newRoot->left = build(inBegin, newRootIndex, postBegin, postBegin + leftSize);
newRoot->right = build(newRootIndex + 1, inEnd, postBegin + leftSize, postBegin + leftSize + rightSize);
return newRoot;
};
return build(0, inorder.size(), 0, postorder.size());
}
用了多少时间?
0.002547s
我还是太年轻。
附:我再次重写的版本
TreeNode* buildTree(vector<int> &inorder, vector<int> &postorder){
if (inorder.empty() || postorder.empty() || inorder.size() != postorder.size()){
return nullptr;
}
using IndexType = vector<int>::size_type;
unordered_map<int, IndexType> inIndexDic;
auto inLength = inorder.size();
for (decltype(inLength) i = 0; i < inLength; ++i){
inIndexDic[inorder[i]] = i;
}
function<TreeNode*(IndexType, IndexType, IndexType, IndexType)> build;
build = [&](IndexType inBegin, IndexType inEnd, IndexType postBegin, IndexType postEnd)->TreeNode*
{
if (inBegin == inEnd){
return nullptr;
}
auto newRootIndex = inIndexDic[postorder[postEnd -1]];
auto newRoot = new TreeNode(inorder[newRootIndex]);
auto leftSubTreeSize = newRootIndex - inBegin;
auto rightSubTreeSize = inEnd - newRootIndex - 1;
newRoot->left = build(inBegin, newRootIndex, postBegin,
postBegin + leftSubTreeSize);
newRoot->right = build(newRootIndex + 1, inEnd,
postBegin + leftSubTreeSize,
postBegin + leftSubTreeSize
+ rightSubTreeSize);
return newRoot;
};
return build(0, inLength, 0, postorder.size());
}