7 volatile不能替代synchronized

volatile并不能保证多个线程共同修改running变量时所带来的不一致问题，也就是说volatile不能替代synchronized

public class T {
	volatile int count = 0; 
	void m() {
		for(int i=0; i<10000; i++) count++;
	}
	
	public static void main(String[] args) {
		T t = new T();
		
		List<Thread> threads = new ArrayList<Thread>();
		
		for(int i=0; i<10; i++) {
			threads.add(new Thread(t::m, "thread-"+i));
		}
		
		threads.forEach((o)->o.start());
		
		threads.forEach((o)->{
			try {
				o.join();
			} catch (InterruptedException e) {
				e.printStackTrace();
			}
		});
		
		System.out.println(t.count);
		
		
	}
	
}

常见面试题： volatile和synchronized区别

++操作不具备原子性

转载于:https://my.oschina.net/u/4131327/blog/3057496