count(*)与count(1)有区别吗？

看到别人使用count(1)来统计记录数，据说是资源消耗少，今天做了个测试：

先看count(*):

[oracle@single bdump]$ sqlplus '/as sysdba'

SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production on Sat Mar 21 10:21:21 2009

Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation.  All rights reserved.

Connected to an idle instance.

idle>startup
ORACLE instance started.

Total System Global Area  120017880 bytes
Fixed Size                   451544 bytes
Variable Size              67108864 bytes
Database Buffers           50331648 bytes
Redo Buffers                2125824 bytes
Database mounted.
Database opened.
idle>set autot on
idle>select count(*) from scott.test;

  COUNT(*)
----------
    282912

Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
   0      SELECT STATEMENT ptimizer=CHOOSE
   1    0   SORT (AGGREGATE)
   2    1     TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'TEST'

 

Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
        164  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
       3462  consistent gets
       3439  physical reads
          0  redo size
        381  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        503  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          2  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
          1  rows processed

再看count(1):

SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production on Sat Mar 21 10:22:29 2009

Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation.  All rights reserved.

Connected to an idle instance.

idle>startup
ORACLE instance started.

Total System Global Area  120017880 bytes
Fixed Size                   451544 bytes
Variable Size              67108864 bytes
Database Buffers           50331648 bytes
Redo Buffers                2125824 bytes
Database mounted.
Database opened.
idle>set autot on
idle>select count(1) from scott.test;

  COUNT(1)
----------
    282912

Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
   0      SELECT STATEMENT ptimizer=CHOOSE
   1    0   SORT (AGGREGATE)
   2    1     TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'TEST'

 

Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
        164  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
       3462  consistent gets
       3439  physical reads
          0  redo size
        381  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        503  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          2  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
          1  rows processed

二者的资源消耗是一致的，没看出有多大区别。在tom的网站上，有这样一段：

You Asked

 

and we said...

来自 “ ITPUB博客 ” ，链接：http://blog.itpub.net/10972173/viewspace-573277/，如需转载，请注明出处，否则将追究法律责任。

转载于:http://blog.itpub.net/10972173/viewspace-573277/