这是某个DW应用里的大sql,原来据说5分钟就执行完了,现在居然要5个小时,看看情况吧:
SELECT r_Time.time_id,
ae.accounting_entity_id,
cs.vendor_id,
ai.account_item_id,
ta.target_account_id,
rf.previous_balance PERIOD_BEGIN_BALANCES,
rf.balance PERIOD_net_BALANCES
FROM (
-- Part 1/2, Uncleared & overdue documents when it's calaculation day
SELECT bsik.shkzg,
bsik.dmbtr,
bsik.zfbdt,
bsik.bukrs,
bsik.hkont,
bsik.source_code,
bsik.blart,
bsik.lifnr,
bsik.gjahr,
bsik.monat,
bsik.belnr,
bsik.augdt,
bsik.budat
FROM myods_bsik bsik
WHERE
-- calaculation day is later than GL date
bsik.budat < to_date(to_char(r_Time.time_id), 'yyyymmdd') + 1
UNION ALL
-- Part 2/2, Althouth already cleared now, still uncleared & overdue documents
-- when it's calaculation day
SELECT bsak.shkzg,
bsak.dmbtr,
bsak.zfbdt,
bsak.bukrs,
bsak.hkont,
bsak.source_code,
bsak.blart,
bsak.lifnr,
bsak.gjahr,
bsak.monat,
bsak.belnr,
bsak.augdt,
bsak.budat
FROM myods_bsak bsak
WHERE
bsak.budat < to_date(to_char(r_Time.time_id), 'yyyymmdd') + 1
AND bsak.augdt >= to_date(to_char(p_time_id) ,'yyyymmdd')
) bsak
,
target_account_dim ta,
accounting_item_dim ai,
accounting_entity_dim ae,
vendor_dim cs,
(SELECT ag.aging_id,
ag.aging_name,
to_number(ag.attribute1) start_days,
nvl(to_number(ag.attribute2), 1e100) end_days
FROM dwdim.aging_dim ag
WHERE ag.aging_id >= 1002) ag,
(select *
from my_report_01_fact rf
where rf.time_id = r_Time.time_id) rf
WHERE ta.corporation_code = CASE(bsak.bukrs) WHEN '1000' THEN('E2100') ELSE('E2000') END
AND ta.mapping_account_code = bsak.hkont
AND cs.vendor_code = bsak.lifnr
AND ta.standard_account_code = ai.standard_account_code
AND ae.corporation_code = bsak.source_code
and rf.vendor_id = cs.vendor_id(+)
and rf.accounting_entity_id = ae.accounting_entity_id(+)
and rf.target_account_id = ta.target_account_id(+)
and rf.account_item_id = ai.account_item_id(+)
AND ta.set_of_books_code = '2'
AND CS.CORP_CODE = '81000'
AND cs.set_of_books_code = '2'
and (to_date(to_char(r_Time.time_id), 'yyyymmdd') - bsak.budat) between ag.start_days and ag.end_days
group by ae.accounting_entity_id,
cs.vendor_id,
ai.account_item_id,
ta.target_account_id,
rf.previous_balance,
rf.balance
简单看了一下,用了这么多左连接,想快都难。缺两个索引,先把bsak.budat和rf.time_id建上索引,执行速度降为10分钟,从数据量上来看bsik表数据量非常小,只几万条,但v$session_longops里却显示tsc速度非常慢,查看其块数,hwm下差不多几万个数据块,跟记录数基本上1:1的关系。晕倒,难道用了insert/*+append*/?不管它了,alter table bsik move;一把吧,块数降到了1000,再执行,50秒。
[@more@]
来自 “ ITPUB博客 ” ,链接:http://blog.itpub.net/112417/viewspace-980335/,如需转载,请注明出处,否则将追究法律责任。
转载于:http://blog.itpub.net/112417/viewspace-980335/