mysql主从和触发器的关系

mysql主从和触发器的关系
binlog_format=row

binlog_format=statement是不一样的




环境准备:
mysql  5.5
主库上:
create database test;
use test;
create table t (id int);
create table t_log (id int, dd date);
 create trigger tri_t  after insert on t
     for each row
     insert into t_log values (new.id,now());
主从上查看trigger都是存在的
主:
mysql> show triggers from test;
+---------+--------+-------+-----------------------------------------+--------+---------+--------------------+---------+----------------------+----------------------+--------------------+
| Trigger | Event  | Table | Statement                               | Timing | Created | sql_mode           | Definer | character_set_client | collation_connection | Database Collation |
+---------+--------+-------+-----------------------------------------+--------+---------+--------------------+---------+----------------------+----------------------+--------------------+
| tri_t   | INSERT | t     | insert into t_log values (new.id,now()) | AFTER  | NULL    | ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY | root@%  | utf8                 | utf8_general_ci      | utf8_general_ci    |
+---------+--------+-------+-----------------------------------------+--------+---------+--------------------+---------+----------------------+----------------------+--------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
从:
mysql> show triggers from test;
+---------+--------+-------+-----------------------------------------+--------+---------+--------------------+---------+----------------------+----------------------+--------------------+
| Trigger | Event  | Table | Statement                               | Timing | Created | sql_mode           | Definer | character_set_client | collation_connection | Database Collation |
+---------+--------+-------+-----------------------------------------+--------+---------+--------------------+---------+----------------------+----------------------+--------------------+
| tri_t   | INSERT | t     | insert into t_log values (new.id,now()) | AFTER  | NULL    | ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY | root@%  | utf8                 | utf8_general_ci      | utf8_general_ci    |
+---------+--------+-------+-----------------------------------------+--------+---------+--------------------+---------+----------------------+----------------------+--------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
场景1:
主从上都存在trigger:
主库上执行操作:
mysql> flush logs;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> insert into t values (1);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from t_log;
+------+------------+
| id   | dd         |
+------+------------+
|    1 | 2015-12-03 |
+------+------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
解析binlog,发现两条语句都被写入到binlog
BINLOG '
v1pgVhOAEwQKKAAAAN8AAAAAADEAAAAAAAEABHRlc3QAAXQAAQMAAQ==
v1pgVhOAEwQKLQAAAAwBAAAAADIAAAAAAAEABHRlc3QABXRfbG9nAAIDCgAD
v1pgVheAEwQKIgAAAC4BAAAAADEAAAAAAAAAAf/+AQAAAA==
### INSERT INTO test.t
### SET
###   @1=1 /* INT meta=0 nullable=1 is_null=0 */
v1pgVheAEwQKJQAAAFMBAAAAADIAAAAAAAEAAv/8AQAAAIO/Dw==
'/*!*/;
### INSERT INTO test.t_log
### SET
###   @1=1 /* INT meta=0 nullable=1 is_null=0 */
###   @2='2015:12:03' /* DATE meta=0 nullable=1 is_null=0 */
# at 339
#151203 23:07:43 server id 168039296  end_log_pos 366   Xid = 322
COMMIT/*!*/;
DELIMITER ;
# End of log file
ROLLBACK /* added by mysqlbinlog */;
/*!50003 SET COMPLETION_TYPE=@OLD_COMPLETION_TYPE*/;    
从库上查看:
mysql> select * from t_log;
+------+------------+
| id   | dd         |
+------+------------+
|    1 | 2015-12-03 |
+------+------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from t;
+------+
| id   |
+------+
|    1 |
+------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
主从都存在trigger时,主库会记录下所有的操作,包含trigger的操作,从库上数据和主库一致.
场景2: 在从库上删掉trigger
从:
mysql> drop trigger tri_t;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
主: 再次插入一条数据:
mysql> insert into t values (2);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from t_log;
+------+------------+
| id   | dd         |
+------+------------+
|    1 | 2015-12-03 |
|    2 | 2015-12-03 |
+------+------------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
从上查看:
mysql>  select * from t_log;
+------+------------+
| id   | dd         |
+------+------------+
|    1 | 2015-12-03 |
|    2 | 2015-12-03 |
+------+------------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
主从数据一致
从库上没有trigger时,依然不影响
场景3: 主库上没有 trigger,从库上有时
主库:
mysql> drop trigger tri_t;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
从库:
mysql>  create trigger tri_t  after insert on t
    ->      for each row
    ->      insert into t_log values (new.id,now());
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
主库:
mysql> insert into t values (3);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from t_log;
+------+------------+
| id   | dd         |
+------+------------+
|    1 | 2015-12-03 |
|    2 | 2015-12-03 |
+------+------------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
从库:
mysql> select * from t_log;
+------+------------+
| id   | dd         |
+------+------------+
|    1 | 2015-12-03 |
|    2 | 2015-12-03 |
+------+------------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
主从数据依然一致,从库上的trigger没有被触发
binlog_format=row
结论:
1 主从都存在trigger时,主库会记录下所有的操作,包含trigger的操作,从库上数据和主库一致.
2 主有trigger,从库上没有trigger时,依然不影响主从同步
3 主上无trigger,从上有trigger时 ,主从数据依然一致,从库上的trigger没有被触发








场景1:
主从上都存在trigger:
主库上执行操作:
mysql> flush logs;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
ysql> insert into t values (1);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from t_log;
+------+------------+
| id   | dd         |
+------+------------+
|    1 | 2015-12-03 |
+------+------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
解析binlog发现只有一条语句被记录,触发器没被记录:
use test/*!*/;
SET TIMESTAMP=1449156230/*!*/;
insert into t values (1)
/*!*/;
# at 278
#151203 23:23:50 server id 168039296  end_log_pos 305   Xid = 357
COMMIT/*!*/;
DELIMITER ;
# End of log file
ROLLBACK /* added by mysqlbinlog */;
/*!50003 SET COMPLETION_TYPE=@OLD_COMPLETION_TYPE*/;
从库上查看:
mysql> select * from t_log;
+------+------------+
| id   | dd         |
+------+------------+
|    1 | 2015-12-03 |
+------+------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from t;
+------+
| id   |
+------+
|    1 |
+------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
主从都存在trigger时,主库会记录sql语句,不包含trigger的操作,从库上数据和主库一致.
场景2: 在从库上删掉trigger
从:
mysql> drop trigger tri_t;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
主: 再次插入一条数据:
mysql> insert into t values (2);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from t_log;
+------+------------+
| id   | dd         |
+------+------------+
|    1 | 2015-12-03 |
|    2 | 2015-12-03 |
+------+------------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
从上查看:
mysql>  select * from t_log;
+------+------------+
| id   | dd         |
+------+------------+
|    1 | 2015-12-03 |
+------+------------+
1 rows in set (0.00 sec)
主从数据不一致
从库上没有trigger时,触发器不会被执行
场景3: 主库上没有 trigger,从库上有时
主库:
mysql> drop trigger tri_t;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
从库:
mysql>  create trigger tri_t  after insert on t
    ->      for each row
    ->      insert into t_log values (new.id,now());
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
主库:
mysql> insert into t values (3);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from t_log;
+------+------------+
| id   | dd         |
+------+------------+
|    1 | 2015-12-03 |
|    2 | 2015-12-03 |
+------+------------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
从库:
mysql> select * from t_log;
+------+------------+
| id   | dd         |
+------+------------+
|    1 | 2015-12-03 |
|    3 | 2015-12-03 |
+------+------------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
主从数据不一致,从库上的trigger被触发
binlog_format=statement
结论:
1 主从都存在trigger时,主库会记录sql语句,不包含trigger的操作,从库上数据和主库一致..
2 主有trigger,从库上没有trigger时,从库上没有trigger时,触发器不会被执行
3 主上无trigger,从上有trigger时 ,主从数据不一致,从库上的trigger被触发




转载请注明源出处 
QQ 273002188 欢迎一起学习 
QQ 群 236941212 
oracle,mysql,mongo 相互交流



来自 “ ITPUB博客 ” ,链接:http://blog.itpub.net/25099483/viewspace-1853209/,如需转载,请注明出处,否则将追究法律责任。

转载于:http://blog.itpub.net/25099483/viewspace-1853209/

  • 0
    点赞
  • 2
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值