转载 SLA Part 10 - Testing and explaination of SLA Config

SLA Part 10 - Testing and explaination of SLA Config SLA Part 10 - Testing and explaination of SLA Config

原文链接：http://apps2fusion.com/apps-training/r12-functional-documents/499-sla-steps-example-subledger-accounting

In the SLA articles Part 1 to Part 6, we understood the basic concepts of Subledger Accounting.
In the SLA articles Part 7 to Part 9, we configured SLA for Payables as an example.

In this article, we will test the configuration to see the results of the configuration performed in Part 7 to Part 9 of the SLA articles. We will also explain the results of the test.

Our SLA setup was done for Payables, hence we will create an Invoice in Payables and check the accounting entries to reconcile those against our SLA setup.

If you recollect, we created an AAD named ANIL_PAYBLES which is attached to Oracle Payables module. This AAD will invoke JLD named ANIL_JLD to build the journal lines when an event takes place against the Payables invoice.

In the image below we are creating an Invoice from Payables responsibility and ensuring its invoice line distribution account is 01-110-6100-0000-000.
Next we click on Actions button and validate the invoice and create accounting entries.



Now check the accounting generated by clicking on menu title Reports||View Accounting as shown in the image below.





You will notice that the Debit entry of 1000 is charged to 01-110-7450-0000-000 instead of being charged to 01-110-6100-0000-000 in the Invoice Distribution Line of Payables. Please note that the third segments value of 6100 from Invoice Distribution has been replaced by 7450 from ADR named ANIL_EXPENSE_ADR as shown below.  

The complete logic is described after this image.


Now, let us revisit how the credit line in the journal has been built. Typically Code Combination for the credit/liability accounting entry of the invoice line is picked from Payables Options setup of the operating unit. However in this case, in SLA we have hard coded the credit account to be 01.000.2220.0000.000. This was done by defining ANIL_LIABILIY_ADR as shown below. In this case the ADR returns the complete CCID because the Output Type radio button is set to Flexfield.

Hence, the SLA has generated the same Credit entry CCID for the invoice, as shown in image below
Needless to say that the ANIL_LIABILITY_ADR was attached to the Journal Line Type=ANIL_JLT_CREDIT.  

来自 “ ITPUB博客 ” ，链接：http://blog.itpub.net/17087603/viewspace-683806/，如需转载，请注明出处，否则将追究法律责任。

转载于:http://blog.itpub.net/17087603/viewspace-683806/