linux看cpu总线规格_为什么在Windows和Linux上获得不同的CPU规格信息？

linux看cpu总线规格

If you like testing or just checking up on your computer’s hardware specifications, you might be surprised to see different operating systems provide conflicting information about your hardware. Why is that? Today’s SuperUser Q&A post helps clear up the confusion for a concerned reader.

如果您喜欢测试或只是检查计算机的硬件规格，可能会惊讶地发现不同的操作系统提供了有关您的硬件的冲突信息。 这是为什么？ 今天的“超级用户”问答页面有助于消除有关读者的困惑。

Today’s Question & Answer session comes to us courtesy of SuperUser—a subdivision of Stack Exchange, a community-driven grouping of Q&A web sites.

今天的“问答”环节由SuperUser提供，它是Stack Exchange的一个分支，该社区是由社区驱动的Q＆A网站分组。

Screenshot courtesy of Karan Raj Baruah (SuperUser).

屏幕快照由Karan Raj Baruah(超级用户)提供 。

问题 (The Question)

SuperUser reader Daniel Sebestyen wants to know why different operating systems are providing conflicting hardware specification information:

超级用户读者Daniel Sebestyen想知道为什么不同的操作系统提供冲突的硬件规范信息：

I have a 3.6 GHz AMD FM2 A8-Series A8 5600K CPU (factory specs) and there is at least a 0.2 GHz difference between hardware reports on Windows and Linux.

我有一个3.6 GHz AMD FM2 A8系列A8 5600K CPU(出厂规格)，并且Windows和Linux上的硬件报告之间至少相差0.2 GHz。

The hardware was checked on the following operating systems:

已在以下操作系统上检查了硬件：

• Windows 7 Ultimate x64 & x86 (both tests showed 3.4 GHz)
  Windows 7 Ultimate x64和x86(两项测试均显示3.4 GHz)
• Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & x86 (both tests showed 3.5 GHz)
  Windows 8.1 Pro x64和x86(两项测试均显示3.5 GHz)
• Ubuntu 14.10 & 14.10.1 x86 & x64 (tests displayed the correct amount, 3.6 GHz )
  Ubuntu 14.10＆14.10.1 x86＆x64(测试显示正确的数量3.6 GHz)
• Linux Mint 17 (x86 & x64, tests on Mate showed 3.55 GHz; x86 & x64 tests on Cinnamon displayed the correct amount, 3.6 GHz )
  Linux Mint 17(x86和x64，在Mate上进行的测试显示3.55 GHz；在Cinnamon上的x86和x64测试显示了正确的数量，3.6 GHz)

I know the CPU and my ASROCK motherboard have the ability to over-clock, but it is not enabled, so I do not think that will affect hardware tests.

我知道CPU和ASROCK主板都具有超频能力，但是未启用，因此我认为这不会影响硬件测试。

Does anyone know if it is a sign of broken/damaged hardware or is it just differences between operating systems?

有谁知道这是硬件损坏/损坏的迹象，还是操作系统之间的差异？

Why is Daniel getting different results for the same hardware?

为什么Daniel在相同的硬件上获得不同的结果？

答案 (The Answer)

SuperUser contributors Karan Raj Baruah and user201235 have the answer for us. First up, Karan Raj Baruah:

超级用户贡献者Karan Raj Baruah和user201235为我们提供了答案。 首先，Karan Raj Baruah：

I would recommend something like Speccy to get accurate specification information for your PC.

我建议使用Speccy之类的东西，以获取准确的PC规格信息。

The Task Manager in Windows 8/8.1 always shows the present clock for your CPU. Sometimes when power saving modes are enabled (especially in laptops), the processor under-clocks on the go to save power and you will see a smaller number in the Task Manager.

Windows 8 / 8.1中的任务管理器始终显示CPU的当前时钟。 有时，当启用省电模式时(尤其是在笔记本电脑中)，处理器会不停地节约电能，因此在任务管理器中会看到较小的数字。

Followed by the answer from user201235:

随后是来自user201235的答案：

Even without over-clocking or under-clocking, modern CPUs change their speed. They can enter turbo mode or power saving mode (and dip way way down). The difference in the exact background processes running is what accounts for the difference in reported speed.

即使没有超频或超频，现代CPU也会改变其速度。 他们可以进入涡轮增压模式或省电模式(向下倾斜)。 实际运行的后台进程的差异是造成报告速度差异的原因。

In fact, many CPU monitoring programs let you observe the changes in speed in real time as you run and/or close programs.

实际上，许多CPU监视程序可让您在运行和/或关闭程序时实时观察速度的变化。

---

---

Have something to add to the explanation? Sound off in the comments. Want to read more answers from other tech-savvy Stack Exchange users? Check out the full discussion thread here.

有什么补充说明吗？ 在评论中听起来不错。 是否想从其他精通Stack Exchange的用户那里获得更多答案？ 在此处查看完整的讨论线程 。

翻译自: https://www.howtogeek.com/205389/why-am-i-getting-different-cpu-specification-information-on-windows-and-linux/

linux看cpu总线规格