css css2 css3_关于CSS的真相

css css2 css3

Whether you call yourself a "full stack engineer" or not, most of us fashion ourselves able to dabble on each side of a website infrastructure.  Of course the same people who fancy themselves as capable would probably also tell you they're much stronger on client or server sides.  I feel way more comfortable on the client side and I admire the hell out of server side legends I work with at Mozilla.  That's why I found this comic incredibly on point:

不管您是否称自己为“全栈工程师”,我们大多数人都可以涉足网站基础架构的各个方面。 当然,喜欢自己有能力的人可能也会告诉你,他们在客户端或服务器端要强大得多。 在客户端方面,我感觉更自在,而且我在Mozilla与之合作的服务器端传奇中非常佩服。 这就是为什么我在点上发现这部漫画的原因:

CSS Comic

I find it hilarious when a server side deity rages about CSS and proceeds to ask me a simple CSS-related question.  Not hilarious like "you're an idiot" hilarious, but more so a "whoa, you are human" hilarious.  CSS is almost the least dynamic of all languages and it throws people for a loop.  And why shouldn't it?  Browser differences, device differences, API interpretations -- we're all shooting at a moving target.  The difference?  Server side devs hate it and client side devs embrace it.  CSS...can't live with it, can't live without it.

当服务器端的神灵激怒CSS并继续问我一个与CSS相关的简单问题时,我感到很搞笑。 并不是像“你是个白痴”那样热闹,而是“哇,你人类”。 CSS几乎是所有语言中动态性最差的,它使人们陷入混乱。 为什么不呢? 浏览器差异,设备差异,API解释-我们都是在移动的目标上进行拍摄。 区别? 服务器端开发人员讨厌它,而客户端开发人员则接受它。 CSS ...不能忍受它,不能没有它。

Original image appeared on CommitStrip.

原始图像出现在CommitStrip上

翻译自: https://davidwalsh.name/truth-css

css css2 css3

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值