操作系统中同步_操作系统中的经典同步问题

操作系统中同步

经典同步问题 (Classical synchronization problem)

In this section, we present a number of different philosopher synchronization problems that are important mainly because they are examples for a large class of concurrency- control problems. These problems are used for testing nearly every new proposed synchronization scheme.

在本节中，我们提出了许多不同的哲学家同步问题，这些问题之所以重要，主要是因为它们是一大类并发控制问题的示例。 这些问题用于测试几乎所有新提出的同步方案。

有界缓冲区问题/生产者-消费者问题 (Bounded buffer problem/ producer- consumer problem)

Bounded buffer problem or producer-consumer problem is a classical synchronization problem where we have a buffer with n cells or n slots and there are 2 process producers and consumers can produce and consume one article at a time.

有界缓冲区问题或生产者－消费者问题是一个经典的同步问题，其中我们有一个带有n个单元格或n个插槽的缓冲区，并且有2个流程生产者，并且消费者可以一次生产和消费一件商品。

Write a solution using a semaphore to ensure overflow condition for producers underflow for consume and a critical section for the buffer.

使用信号量编写解决方案，以确保生产者下溢的溢出条件(消耗)和缓冲区的关键部分。

Here we have pool of n buffers.

在这里，我们有n个缓冲区的池。

Mutex - Semaphore for mutual exclusion to access buffer pool, initialized to 1.

Mutex-互斥访问缓冲池的信号量，初始化为1。

Empty - Semaphore to count empty buffer N.

空 -用来计数空缓冲区N的信号量。

Full - Semaphore to count fill buffer 0.

Full-信号量，用于计数填充缓冲区0。

Producer	Consumer
Wait (empty) Wait (mutex) Critical section Signal (mutex) Signal (full)

制片人	消费者
Wait (empty) Wait (mutex) Critical section Signal (mutex) Signal (full)

We have used 3 semaphore e- empty cells, as well as underflow f- fixed cells as well as overflow mutex, is used for the critical section.

我们使用了3个信号量e-empty单元，以及下溢f-fixed单元以及上溢互斥体，用于关键部分。

Example:

例：

P	C
while(1) { produce(); wait(e) wait(mutex) append() signal(mutex) signal(f) }

P	C
while(1) { produce(); wait(e) wait(mutex) append() signal(mutex) signal(f) }

1. Reader/writer problem

1.读写器问题

• There is a shared piece of text and 2 types of process in accessing this text reader and writer.

  访问此文本读取器和写入器时，有一段共享的文本和2种类型的过程。

• There is no clash between reader and reader therefore when a reader is inside critical section then other readers may get an only entry but when a write is inside critical section then neither the reader nor the writer gets an entry.

  阅读器与阅读器之间没有冲突，因此，当某个阅读器位于关键区域内时，其他阅读器可能会获得唯一的条目，但是当某个写入位于关键区域内时，该阅读器或写入器都不会获得该条目。

• Hence in the solution, we have used 3 resources a semaphore mutex for synchronization between writer and reader-writer.

  因此，在解决方案中，我们使用了3种资源(信号量互斥体)来实现写程序和读程序-写程序之间的同步。

• While read count (RC) is a simple integer variable which is given security by reading semaphore which works for synchronization between reader- reader.

  读计数(RC)是一个简单的整数变量，通过读取信号量为安全性提供了安全性，该信号量可在读取器与读取器之间进行同步。

Writer

作家

while(1)
{  
	wait(mutex)
	write
	signal(mutex)
}

Reader

读者

while(1)
{  
	wait(Read)
	Rc = Rc + 1;
	
	if(Rc = = 1)
	{  
		wait (mutex)
	} 
	
	wait(Read)
	Rc = Rc-1
	
	if(Rc ==0)
	{ 
		signal(mutex)
	}
	
	signal(Read)
}

2. Dining Philosopher problem

2.用餐哲学家的问题

In this problem, there is a circular table and number of philosopher a sitting on the table. There is a chop-stick placed between every philosopher. Philosopher prior only 2 processes either they think or eat (using 2 chop-stick).

在这个问题上，有一张圆桌和一些哲学家坐在桌子上。 每个哲学家之间都有一根筷子。 哲学家仅考虑或思考了两个过程(使用两根筷子)。

Pi()
while(1)
{ 
	think
	P(s)
	Wait (chop-stick[i])
	Wait (chop-stick(i+1 % 5)
	V(s)
	Eat
	Signal( chop-stick[i]
	Signal (chop-stick(i+1 % 5)
	Think
}

Solution using semaphore for philosopher synchronization

使用信号量实现哲学家同步的解决方案

Solution suffers from dead-lock and the following modification can be done:

解决方案陷入僵局，可以进行以下修改：

1. Allow n-1 philosopher to sit on the table.

   让n-1位哲学家坐在桌子上。

2. Allow n+1 chop-stick to be put on the table.

   允许将n + 1根筷子放在桌子上。

3. n-1 philosopher picks the left chop-stick first(the right and then the last philosopher pick the right first and left or vice-versa.

   n-1位哲学家首先选择左筷子(右再选择最后一位哲学家，然后右再选择最后一位)。

4. Division can be done between add an even number philosopher.

   可以在除以偶数的哲学家之间完成除法。

5. Take one more semaphore and consider 2 wait operation as a critical section.

   再增加一个信号量，并将2个等待操作视为关键部分。

Improved implementation

改进的实施

Here, there will be 2 improvements:

在这里，将有2处改进：

• The implementation will become effective as there is no wastage of CPU clock cycles.

  该实现将变得有效，因为不会浪费CPU时钟周期。

• The bounded wait will also be ensured as it uses strictly follow First come first serve.

  由于严格遵循“先到先得”的原则，因此也将确保一定的等待时间。

P(s) { s = s-1 if (s<0) { block(); Add it to the queue(); } }

P(s) { s = s-1 if (s<0) { block(); Add it to the queue(); } }

翻译自: https://www.includehelp.com/operating-systems/classical-synchronization-problem.aspx

操作系统中同步