（转）几种基于HTTP协议的RPC性能比较

几种基于HTTP协议的RPC性能比较
今天写个程序测试了一下Axis(SOAP), Hessian(Binary), Burlap(XML-RPC), REST的性能。

服务端的是一个简单的加密、解密方法，各种协议使用同一个实现的代码。
客户端是独立的java程序，分别用各种协议对服务端的方法进行调用。每一种协议循环调用n次，然后取平均值。

循环1,000次的测试
[b]第一次[/b]

Axis --------------->> Total time: 11123 ms, Avg time: 11.123 ms
Burlap ------------->> Total time: 866 ms, Avg time: 0.866 ms
Hessian ------------>> Total time: 581 ms, Avg time: 0.581 ms
REST --------------->> Total time: 929 ms, Avg time: 0.929 ms
AxisUsingWSDL2Java ->> Total time: 11998 ms, Avg time: 11.998 ms
[b]第二次[/b]

Axis --------------->> Total time: 11256 ms, Avg time: 11.256 ms
Burlap ------------->> Total time: 816 ms, Avg time: 0.816 ms
Hessian ------------>> Total time: 582 ms, Avg time: 0.582 ms
REST --------------->> Total time: 919 ms, Avg time: 0.919 ms
AxisUsingWSDL2Java ->> Total time: 11908 ms, Avg time: 11.908 ms
[b]循环10,000次的测试
第一次[/b]

Axis --------------->> Total time: 88013 ms, Avg time: 8.8013 ms
Burlap ------------->> Total time: 5789 ms, Avg time: 0.5789 ms
Hessian ------------>> Total time: 5162 ms, Avg time: 0.5162 ms
REST --------------->> Total time: 8316 ms, Avg time: 0.8316 ms
AxisUsingWSDL2Java ->> Total time: 112801 ms, Avg time: 11.2801 ms
[b]第二次[/b]

Axis --------------->> Total time: 87359 ms, Avg time: 8.7359 ms
Burlap ------------->> Total time: 5784 ms, Avg time: 0.5784 ms
Hessian ------------>> Total time: 5084 ms, Avg time: 0.5084 ms
REST --------------->> Total time: 7983 ms, Avg time: 0.7983 ms
AxisUsingWSDL2Java ->> Total time: 113234 ms, Avg time: 11.3234 ms
测试结果
Hessian最快，Burlap第二，REST第三，Axis最慢。前3种要比Axis快了10倍或者更多。

上面的测试，服务端用的是Resin-3.0.13，出于好奇，我又用Tomcat-5.5.9测试了一把，结果是Resin确实比Tomcat快些。
Tomcat-5.5.9 循环10,000次的测试

Axis --------------->> Total time: 122551 ms, Avg time: 12.2551ms
Burlap ------------->> Total time: 6401 ms, Avg time: 0.6401ms
Hessian ------------>> Total time: 5745 ms, Avg time: 0.5745ms
REST --------------->> Total time: 8090 ms, Avg time: 0.809ms
AxisUsingWSDL2Java ->> Total time: 156908 ms, Avg time: 15.6908ms