概要
- 类继承关系
java.lang.Object
java.util.AbstractMap<K,V>
java.util.HashMap<K,V>
- 定义
public class TreeMap<K,V>
extends AbstractMap<K,V>
implements NavigableMap<K,V>, Cloneable, java.io.Serializable
- 要点
1) 基于 NavigableMap 实现的红黑树
2) 按 natrual ordering
或者 Comparator
定义的次序排序
3) 基本操作containsKey
,get
,put
有 log(n)
的时间复杂度
4) 非线程安全
实现
- Comparator
private final Comparator<? super K> comparator;
这说明提供的 Comparator
参数类型是 K
的基类就行。这似乎意味着基类的 Comparator
与导出类的要一致。
- Entry
private transient Entry<K,V> root = null;
root
是这棵红黑树的根,那么从 Entry
的定义可以体现树的结构:
static final class Entry<K,V> implements Map.Entry<K,V> {
K key;
V value;
Entry<K,V> left = null;
Entry<K,V> right = null;
Entry<K,V> parent;
boolean color = BLACK;
...
}
注意这是个 static final
类,left
,right
,parent
分别指向左子树,右子树,父结点, color
颜色默认为黑。
- containsKey
public boolean containsKey(Object key) {
return getEntry(key) != null;
}
final Entry<K,V> getEntry(Object key) {
// Offload comparator-based version for sake of performance
if (comparator != null)
return getEntryUsingComparator(key);
if (key == null)
throw new NullPointerException();
Comparable<? super K> k = (Comparable<? super K>) key;
Entry<K,V> p = root;
while (p != null) {
int cmp = k.compareTo(p.key);
if (cmp < 0)
p = p.left;
else if (cmp > 0)
p = p.right;
else
return p;
}
return null;
}
关键操作 containsKey
是通过调用 getEntry
完成其功能的。可以看出,这是通过在红黑树上进行查找完成的,每次比较都会下降到树的下一层,由于红黑树的平衡性,时间复杂度为 log(n)
。
- containsValue
public boolean containsValue(Object value) {
for (Entry<K,V> e = getFirstEntry(); e != null; e = successor(e))
if (valEquals(value, e.value))
return true;
return false;
}
可以看出,对 value
的查找,与对 key
是不同的。是通过 getFirstEntry
取得第一个结点,再通过 successor
遍历实现。
final Entry<K,V> getFirstEntry() {
Entry<K,V> p = root;
if (p != null)
while (p.left != null)
p = p.left;
return p;
}
可以看出,这是找到了树中最左边的结点,如果左子树中的值小于右子树,这就意味是第一个比较的结点是最小的结点。
static <K,V> TreeMap.Entry<K,V> successor(Entry<K,V> t) {
if (t == null)
return null;
else if (t.right != null) {
Entry<K,V> p = t.right;
while (p.left != null)
p = p.left;
return p;
} else {
Entry<K,V> p = t.parent;
Entry<K,V> ch = t;
while (p != null && ch == p.right) {
ch = p;
p = p.parent;
}
return p;
}
}
successor
其实就是一个结点的 下一个结点
,所谓 下一个
,是按次序排序后的下一个结点。从代码中可以看出,如果右子树不为空,就返回右子树中最小结点。如果右子树为空,就要向上回溯了。在这种情况下,t
是以其为根的树的最后一个结点。如果它是其父结点的左孩子,那么父结点就是它的下一个结点,否则,t
就是以其父结点为根的树的最后一个结点,需要再次向上回溯。一直到 ch
是 p
的左孩子为止。
- getCeilingEntry
/**
* Gets the entry corresponding to the specified key; if no such entry
* exists, returns the entry for the least key greater than the specified
* key; if no such entry exists (i.e., the greatest key in the Tree is less
* than the specified key), returns {@code null}.
*/
final Entry<K,V> getCeilingEntry(K key) {
Entry<K,V> p = root;
while (p != null) {
int cmp = compare(key, p.key);
if (cmp < 0) {
if (p.left != null)
p = p.left;
else
return p;
} else if (cmp > 0) {
if (p.right != null) {
p = p.right;
} else {
Entry<K,V> parent = p.parent;
Entry<K,V> ch = p;
while (parent != null && ch == parent.right) {
ch = parent;
parent = parent.parent;
}
return parent;
}
} else
return p;
}
return null;
}
这个函数看起来有点奇怪,可以从 return
语句,猜想一下这是在做什么,我觉得是在找一个 x.key >= key
的元素,并且 x
是满足条件的元素中最小的。从 23
行看,找到的 p
,key
值与参数 key
相等,从 8
行看,又有 key <= p.key
,并且p.left == null
。
put
/**
* Associates the specified value with the specified key in this map.
* If the map previously contained a mapping for the key, the old
* value is replaced.
*
* @param key key with which the specified value is to be associated
* @param value value to be associated with the specified key
*
* @return the previous value associated with {@code key}, or
* {@code null} if there was no mapping for {@code key}.
* (A {@code null} return can also indicate that the map
* previously associated {@code null} with {@code key}.)
* @throws ClassCastException if the specified key cannot be compared
* with the keys currently in the map
* @throws NullPointerException if the specified key is null
* and this map uses natural ordering, or its comparator
* does not permit null keys
*/
public V put(K key, V value) {
Entry<K,V> t = root;
if (t == null) {
compare(key, key); // type (and possibly null) check
root = new Entry<>(key, value, null);
size = 1;
modCount++;
return null;
}
int cmp;
Entry<K,V> parent;
// split comparator and comparable paths
Comparator<? super K> cpr = comparator;
if (cpr != null) {
do {
parent = t;
cmp = cpr.compare(key, t.key);
if (cmp < 0)
t = t.left;
else if (cmp > 0)
t = t.right;
else
return t.setValue(value);
} while (t != null);
}
else {
if (key == null)
throw new NullPointerException();
Comparable<? super K> k = (Comparable<? super K>) key;
do {
parent = t;
cmp = k.compareTo(t.key);
if (cmp < 0)
t = t.left;
else if (cmp > 0)
t = t.right;
else
return t.setValue(value);
} while (t != null);
}
Entry<K,V> e = new Entry<>(key, value, parent);
if (cmp < 0)
parent.left = e;
else
parent.right = e;
fixAfterInsertion(e);
size++;
modCount++;
return null;
}
put
的过程,其实是将 (key, value)
加入到红黑树中的过程。如果树是空的,那么创建根结点。否则就要在树中插入结点。这个过程根据 comparator
是否存在设置成了两种方式,其实没什么区别,就是比较方式的不同,都是在树中查找一个合适的位置,如果 key
在树中,就 setValue
设置新值,否则,就在 60-64
行插入新结点。这里有个重要的地方是 65
行的fixAfterInsertion
,这个很重要,因为这是一棵红黑树,红黑树关键的思想是要保持它的平衡性,插入结点后,平衡性可能被破坏。所以需要 fix
。
/** From CLR */
private void fixAfterInsertion(Entry<K,V> x) {
x.color = RED;
while (x != null && x != root && x.parent.color == RED) {
if (parentOf(x) == leftOf(parentOf(parentOf(x)))) {
Entry<K,V> y = rightOf(parentOf(parentOf(x)));
if (colorOf(y) == RED) {
setColor(parentOf(x), BLACK);
setColor(y, BLACK);
setColor(parentOf(parentOf(x)), RED);
x = parentOf(parentOf(x));
} else {
if (x == rightOf(parentOf(x))) {
x = parentOf(x);
rotateLeft(x);
}
setColor(parentOf(x), BLACK);
setColor(parentOf(parentOf(x)), RED);
rotateRight(parentOf(parentOf(x)));
}
} else {
Entry<K,V> y = leftOf(parentOf(parentOf(x)));
if (colorOf(y) == RED) {
setColor(parentOf(x), BLACK);
setColor(y, BLACK);
setColor(parentOf(parentOf(x)), RED);
x = parentOf(parentOf(x));
} else {
if (x == leftOf(parentOf(x))) {
x = parentOf(x);
rotateRight(x);
}
setColor(parentOf(x), BLACK);
setColor(parentOf(parentOf(x)), RED);
rotateLeft(parentOf(parentOf(x)));
}
}
}
root.color = BLACK;
}
这是 fixAfterInsertion
的源代码,我不具体解释了,这是一个根据不同情况进行旋转,调整结点颜色的过程,可以参考《算法导论》中的解释。
- remove
public V remove(Object key) {
Entry<K,V> p = getEntry(key);
if (p == null)
return null;
V oldValue = p.value;
deleteEntry(p);
return oldValue;
}
删除的过程主要调用 delteEntry
完成:
private void deleteEntry(Entry<K,V> p) {
modCount++;
size--;
// If strictly internal, copy successor's element to p and then make p
// point to successor.
if (p.left != null && p.right != null) {
Entry<K,V> s = successor(p);
p.key = s.key;
p.value = s.value;
p = s;
} // p has 2 children
// Start fixup at replacement node, if it exists.
Entry<K,V> replacement = (p.left != null ? p.left : p.right);
if (replacement != null) {
// Link replacement to parent
replacement.parent = p.parent;
if (p.parent == null)
root = replacement;
else if (p == p.parent.left)
p.parent.left = replacement;
else
p.parent.right = replacement;
// Null out links so they are OK to use by fixAfterDeletion.
p.left = p.right = p.parent = null;
// Fix replacement
if (p.color == BLACK)
fixAfterDeletion(replacement);
} else if (p.parent == null) { // return if we are the only node.
root = null;
} else { // No children. Use self as phantom replacement and unlink.
if (p.color == BLACK)
fixAfterDeletion(p);
if (p.parent != null) {
if (p == p.parent.left)
p.parent.left = null;
else if (p == p.parent.right)
p.parent.right = null;
p.parent = null;
}
}
}
这个过程同样是与红黑树的性质相关的。在树中删除一个结点,那他的孩子怎么办啊,红黑树不平衡了怎么办啊,树空了怎么办啊,都需要考虑到。
- clear
public void clear() {
modCount++;
size = 0;
root = null;
}
居然就是把值都清空了。。
- clone
/**
* Returns a shallow copy of this {@code TreeMap} instance. (The keys and
* values themselves are not cloned.)
*
* @return a shallow copy of this map
*/
public Object clone() {
TreeMap<K,V> clone = null;
try {
clone = (TreeMap<K,V>) super.clone();
} catch (CloneNotSupportedException e) {
throw new InternalError();
}
// Put clone into "virgin" state (except for comparator)
clone.root = null;
clone.size = 0;
clone.modCount = 0;
clone.entrySet = null;
clone.navigableKeySet = null;
clone.descendingMap = null;
// Initialize clone with our mappings
try {
clone.buildFromSorted(size, entrySet().iterator(), null, null);
} catch (java.io.IOException cannotHappen) {
} catch (ClassNotFoundException cannotHappen) {
}
return clone;
}
clone
复制了一份新的元素,使用了 super.clone()
得的一个新对象,而不是使用 new
,这是为啥?然后把各个域值清空,然后使用 buildFromSorted
插入数据。之所以使用这个函数,是因为红黑树插入操作时间复杂度为 O(lgn)
,n个元素插入就是O(n*lgn)
,太不划算,更何况我们现在插入的是一个红黑树,所以用一个线性时间复杂度的算法来实现复制数据的操作。
/**
* Linear time tree building algorithm from sorted data. Can accept keys
* and/or values from iterator or stream. This leads to too many
* parameters, but seems better than alternatives. The four formats
* that this method accepts are:
*
* 1) An iterator of Map.Entries. (it != null, defaultVal == null).
* 2) An iterator of keys. (it != null, defaultVal != null).
* 3) A stream of alternating serialized keys and values.
* (it == null, defaultVal == null).
* 4) A stream of serialized keys. (it == null, defaultVal != null).
*
* It is assumed that the comparator of the TreeMap is already set prior
* to calling this method.
*
* @param size the number of keys (or key-value pairs) to be read from
* the iterator or stream
* @param it If non-null, new entries are created from entries
* or keys read from this iterator.
* @param str If non-null, new entries are created from keys and
* possibly values read from this stream in serialized form.
* Exactly one of it and str should be non-null.
* @param defaultVal if non-null, this default value is used for
* each value in the map. If null, each value is read from
* iterator or stream, as described above.
* @throws IOException propagated from stream reads. This cannot
* occur if str is null.
* @throws ClassNotFoundException propagated from readObject.
* This cannot occur if str is null.
*/
private void buildFromSorted(int size, Iterator it,
java.io.ObjectInputStream str,
V defaultVal)
throws java.io.IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
this.size = size;
root = buildFromSorted(0, 0, size-1, computeRedLevel(size),
it, str, defaultVal);
}
好吧,我们继续。
private final Entry<K,V> buildFromSorted(int level, int lo, int hi,
int redLevel,
Iterator it,
java.io.ObjectInputStream str,
V defaultVal)
throws java.io.IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
/*
* Strategy: The root is the middlemost element. To get to it, we
* have to first recursively construct the entire left subtree,
* so as to grab all of its elements. We can then proceed with right
* subtree.
*
* The lo and hi arguments are the minimum and maximum
* indices to pull out of the iterator or stream for current subtree.
* They are not actually indexed, we just proceed sequentially,
* ensuring that items are extracted in corresponding order.
*/
if (hi < lo) return null;
int mid = (lo + hi) >>> 1;
Entry<K,V> left = null;
if (lo < mid)
left = buildFromSorted(level+1, lo, mid - 1, redLevel,
it, str, defaultVal);
// extract key and/or value from iterator or stream
K key;
V value;
if (it != null) {
if (defaultVal==null) {
Map.Entry<K,V> entry = (Map.Entry<K,V>)it.next();
key = entry.getKey();
value = entry.getValue();
} else {
key = (K)it.next();
value = defaultVal;
}
} else { // use stream
key = (K) str.readObject();
value = (defaultVal != null ? defaultVal : (V) str.readObject());
}
Entry<K,V> middle = new Entry<>(key, value, null);
// color nodes in non-full bottommost level red
if (level == redLevel)
middle.color = RED;
if (left != null) {
middle.left = left;
left.parent = middle;
}
if (mid < hi) {
Entry<K,V> right = buildFromSorted(level+1, mid+1, hi, redLevel,
it, str, defaultVal);
middle.right = right;
right.parent = middle;
}
return middle;
}
可以看出这是一个递归的算法,找出中间结点,构造左右子树,并将他们连接在一起。时间复杂度分析可以根据递归式:
T(n) = 2 * T(n/2) + C
如果看不出来的话,可以使用《算法导论》第4章中的主定理,可以得到时间复杂度为 O(n)
。