Encapsulate collections

http://www.javapractices.com/topic/TopicAction.do?Id=173

In general, Collections are not immutable objects. As such, one must often exercise care that collection fields are not unintentionally exposed to the caller.

One technique is to define a set of related methods which prevent the caller from directly using the underlying collection, such as:

  • addThing(Thing)
  • removeThing(Thing)
  • getThings() - return an unmodifiable Collection
Example 1  
import java.util.*;

public final class SoccerTeam {

  public SoccerTeam(String aTeamName, String aHeadCoachName){
    //..elided
  }

  public void addPlayer(Player aPlayer){
    fPlayers.add(aPlayer);
  }

  public void removePlayer(Player aPlayer){
    fPlayers.remove(aPlayer);
  }

  public Set<Player> getPlayers(){
    return Collections.unmodifiableSet(fPlayers);
  }

  //..elided

  // PRIVATE 
  private Set<Player> fPlayers = new LinkedHashSet<>();
  private String fTeamName;
  private String fHeadCoachName;
} 

Example 2

BaseballTeam is an example of exposing the collection directly to the caller. This is not necessarily an incorrect design, but it's riskier, since the contents of the collection can be directly changed by both BaseballTeam and its caller: 

import java.util.*;

public final class BaseballTeam {

  public BaseballTeam(String aTeamName, String aHeadCoachName){
    //..elided
  }

  public void setPlayers(Set<Player> aPlayers){
    fPlayers = aPlayers;
  }

  public Set<Player> getPlayers(){
    return fPlayers;
  }

  //..elided

  // PRIVATE
  private Set<Player> fPlayers;
  private String fTeamName;
  private String fHeadCoachName;
} 


  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值