An acoustic phonetic analysis of African American English: A comparative study of two dialects【翻译】

Abstract.....................................................................................................................................iii
Chapter 1: Introduction to the Thesis.........................................................................................1
1.0 Introduction..................................................................................................1
1.1 Statement of the Problem.............................................................................2
1.2 Purpose of the Study.....................................................................................3
1.3 Significance of the Study..............................................................................4
1.4 Limitations of the Study...............................................................................5
1.5 Overview of the Thesis................................................................................6
Chapter 2: Literature Review.....................................................................................................7
2.0 Introduction..................................................................................................7
2.1 Phonetic Literature.......................................................................................8
2.1.1 Introduction...................................................................................8
2.1.2 An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Variation in New World English.
ErikThomas. (2001)...............................................................................9
2.1.3 “The three dialects of English.”
William Labov. (1991).........................................................................11
2.2 Phonological Literature..............................................................................14
2.2.1 Introduction.................................................................................14
2.2.2 African American Vernacular English.
John Rickford. (1999)...........................................................................14
2.2.3 “Some aspects of African-American Vernacular English
phonology”. Guy Bailey & Erik Thomas. (1998)................................16
2.3 Perceptual Literature..................................................................................18
2.3.1 Introduction.................................................................................18
2.3.2 Use of Black English and racial discrimination in urban housing
markets”. Douglas Massey & Garvey Lundy. (2001)..........................18
2.3.3 Testing listeners reactions to phonological markers of ethnic
identity. David Graff, William Labov & Wendell Harris. (1986).........20
2.4 Chapter Summary.......................................................................................21
Chapter 3: Research Design and Methodology........................................................................23
3.0 Research Goals...........................................................................................23
3.1 Hypothesis..................................................................................................24
3.2 Experimental Design..................................................................................25
3.2.1 Target data and collection tools...................................................25
3.2.2 Participant demographics............................................................28
iv
3.3 Methodology...............................................................................................28
3.3.1 Defining the acoustic phonetic variables.....................................29
3.3.2 Vowel duration.............................................................................30
3.3.3 Vowel quality...............................................................................33
3.4 Challenges to Analysis...............................................................................35
3.5 Chapter Summary.......................................................................................36
Chapter 4: Results....................................................................................................................37
4.0 Introduction................................................................................................37
4.1 Vowel Duration..........................................................................................37
4.1.1 Northern Cities Shift vowel duration..........................................38
4.1.2 African American English vowel duration..................................39
4.1.3 Interdialect comparison of vowel duration..................................41
4.1.4 Effects of consonant voicing on vowel length............................43
4.1.5 Summary of duration results.......................................................49
4.2 Vowel Quality.............................................................................................49
4.2.1 Northern Cities Shift vowel quality.............................................50
4.2.2 African American English vowel quality....................................52
4.2.3 Interdialect comparison of vowel quality:
Interaction of raised [ æ ] and front tense/lax vowels..........................53
4.2.4 Summary of quality results..........................................................56
4.3 Chapter Summary.......................................................................................56
Chapter 5: Conclusions............................................................................................................57
5.0 Introduction................................................................................................57
5.1 Summary of Results...................................................................................58
5.1.1 Summary of vowel duration........................................................58
5.1.2 Summary of vowel quality...........................................................59
5.2 Implications of the Results.........................................................................60
5.2.1 The relationship between [ æ ] and front tense/lax vowels........61
5.2.2 Vowel lengthening and consonant voicing..................................62
5.3 Chapter Summary.......................................................................................64
5.4 Directions for Future Research................................................................. 65
References................................................................................................................................66
Bibliography.............................................................................................................................68
Appendix A: Approval letter from the College of Arts and Sciences Human Subjects
Review Committee...........................................................................................75
Appendix B: Preliminary study..............................................................................................76
Appendix C: Word list, test items..........................................................................................79
Appendix D: Demographic questionnaire..............................................................................83
Appendix E: Vowel duration measurements..........................................................................84
v
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Average vowel duration of speakers of Northern Cities Shift (NCS).........................39
2 Average vowel duration of speakers of African American English (AAE).................40
3 Comparison of vowel duration in AAE and NCS........................................................42
4 Front tense/lax vowel lengths in AAE and NCS..........................................................45
5 Average vowel quality of NCS speakers by gender.....................................................84
6 Average vowel quality of AAE speakers by gender.....................................................84
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Illustration of vowel duration, waveform of the word “bead”.....................................31
2 Illustration of glottalization: spectrogram of the word “butt”......................................32
3 Illustration of F2 variability: [ a ] and [ i ]...................................................................34
4 Average length in milliseconds of vowels occurring before stop consonants
in AAE and NCS males....................................................................................47
5 Average length in milliseconds of vowels occurring before stop consonants
in AAE and NCS females.................................................................................48
6 Northern Cities Shift vowel chart................................................................................51
7 African American English vowel chart........................................................................52
8 Front tense/lax vowel quality in NCS..........................................................................54
9 Front tense/lax vowel quality in AAE..........................................................................55
vi
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Average vowel duration of speakers of Northern Cities Shift (NCS).........................39
2 Average vowel duration of speakers of African American English (AAE).................40
3 Comparison of vowel duration in AAE and NCS........................................................42
4 Front tense/lax vowel lengths in AAE and NCS..........................................................45
5 Average vowel quality of NCS speakers by gender.....................................................84
6 Average vowel quality of AAE speakers by gender.....................................................84
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Illustration of vowel duration, waveform of the word “bead”.....................................31
2 Illustration of glottalization: spectrogram of the word “butt”......................................32
3 Illustration of F2 variability: [ a ] and [ i ]...................................................................34
4 Average length in milliseconds of vowels occurring before stop consonants
in AAE and NCS males....................................................................................47
5 Average length in milliseconds of vowels occurring before stop consonants
in AAE and NCS females.................................................................................48
6 Northern Cities Shift vowel chart................................................................................51
7 African American English vowel chart........................................................................52
8 Front tense/lax vowel quality in NCS..........................................................................54
9 Front tense/lax vowel quality in AAE..........................................................................55
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Many people assisted and supported me as I wrote this thesis, and I would like to
acknowledge them here.
I would first like to thank my committee, Beverely Goodman and Edward Garrett. I
thank Beverley for her vision and her generous support. In creating The Linguistics Lab at
EMU, Beverley provided a work space for the data collection and analysis of this thesis. I
also thank Beverley for her analytical insight and her skills as a writer. She has supported me
professionally and personally through every step of this thesis. Her guidance has been
invaluable to my development as a linguist. I thank Edward for having the courage to teach a
course devoted to African American English for the first time at EMU. His class brings
serious linguistic attention to a subject that is often misunderstood and, in doing so,
demonstrates how academic research may act as a positive force in our community. I would
also like to thank Edward for his creative thinking, honest criticism, and for lending me a
sweet computer to use during the course of my thesis.
I also give very special thanks to Karen Dykstra and her Fall 2008 LING 201 students
who volunteered as subjects in my experiment. I thank them all for their patience and humor
during the recording sessions.
Finally, I would like to thank Kevin for his positive impact on my work and, more
importantly, in my life.
Thank you all, so very much!
ii
ABSTRACT
In this thesis, I contribute acoustic phonetic data and analysis to the study of African
American English (AAE). For this research, I collected speech samples of self-identified
AAE speakers and speakers of a dominant coexisting dialect, the Northern Cities Shift
(NCS). I analyze these samples to determine if vowel quality and vowel duration are
consistently and predictably varied between the two dialects. Labov's Chain Shift Principles
are used as the context for the results.
In my analysis, I find that both vowel quality and duration are different between AAE
and NCS in ways previously undocumented in the linguistic literature. The quality analysis
relies on evidence from the vowel [ æ ]. I find that AAE shares a distinct quality feature of
NCS, raised [ æ ], despite the fact that this feature is said not to be present in AAE. This
vowel functions as the pivot point for the chain shift in the NCS data but does not cause a
vowel shift in AAE data analyzed in this thesis. In the analysis of vowel length, I rely on data
from the front tense/lax vowel pairs, [ i ; ] and [ e ; ] in both dialects. ɪ ɛ I find that vowel
length is consistently longer in AAE than in NCS. Additionally, I find that in NCS, the
tense/lax pairs maintain a difference in length in which the tense vowels are longer than the
lax vowels. In AAE, I find that the tense vowels are shorter than the lax vowels. I conclude
that the length differences found in these data sets indicate that Labov's feature
[ +/- peripheral ] is not a feature of the AAE front tense/lax vowel pairs, [ i ; ɪ ] and [ e ; ɛ ]
and that this prevents a vowel shift in AAE that should occur in response to the presence of
the raised [ æ ].

原文地址:

http://www.hongfu951.info/file/resource-detail.do?id=eea80061-ac46-4fb8-a158-57a8e58f92c3

水下声学数据分类是一项重要的研究领域,而深度学习方法在这个领域中的应用也是备受关注的。深度学习是一种基于人工神经网络的机器学习方法,具有处理大型数据集和自动学习特征表示的优势。 在水下声学数据分类中,有许多不同的深度学习方法被用于处理和分类数据。其中之一是卷积神经网络(CNN)。CNN可以自动识别和提取图像数据中的特征,适用于图像分类和物体检测。在声学数据中,将声波数据转换为图像数据的形式,然后利用CNN进行分类,可以有效地利用CNN的特征提取能力。 另一种常见的深度学习方法是循环神经网络(RNN)。RNN是一种能够处理序列数据的神经网络,适用于时间序列数据的分类和预测。在水下声学数据分类中,声波信号通常是时间序列数据,所以使用RNN可以更好地捕捉到数据中的时序特征。 除了CNN和RNN,还有一些其他的深度学习方法可以应用于水下声学数据分类,如深度信念网络(DBN)、深度玻尔兹曼机(DBM)等。这些方法在处理复杂的声学数据分类问题时表现出的性能优越性。 总结来说,水下声学数据分类方法的深度学习应用非常广泛。CNN、RNN等深度学习方法可以有效地处理数据的特征提取和分类任务,同时还有其他的深度学习方法可以进一步优化水下声学数据的分类效果。随着深度学习技术的不断发展,相信在未来将会有更多更先进的方法应用于水下声学数据的分类研究中。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值