An known issue of Genil model name conflict

2448 篇文章 26 订阅

Created by Wang, Jerry on Sep 25, 2015

All the testing is done in component ZCRMSM, which is almost copied from standard component CRMSM. The root object of the two are same – SocialPost.
However when I expand the context node of the UI component which is built on the latter, to my surprise, I find all extension fields created on ZCRMSM are also displayed there in context node of CRMSM, and even could be made visible in UI.


root cause: the determination of the field list belonging to one context node just takes the name of the Genil mode object name, SocialPost, into consideration, but ignore the Genil component name - ZCRMSM or CRMSM.

Solution: A good practice is to always use a unique prefix for your BOL objects.
要获取更多Jerry的原创文章,请关注公众号"汪子熙":

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 打赏
    打赏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包

打赏作者

汪子熙

你的鼓励将是我创作的最大动力

¥1 ¥2 ¥4 ¥6 ¥10 ¥20
扫码支付:¥1
获取中
扫码支付

您的余额不足,请更换扫码支付或充值

打赏作者

实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值