避免使用循环来操作List

     Learning from functional languages, looping isn’t the best way to work on collections. Suppose we want to filter a list of persons to those who can drink beer. The loop versions looks like:

List<Person> beerDrinkers = new ArrayList<Person>();
for (Person p: persons) {
    if (p.getAge() > 16) {
	    beerDrinkers.add(p);
    }
}

This can - even in Java - be rewritten to a more a functional programming style. For example using Google collections filter:

Predicate<HasAge> canDrinkBeer = new Predicate<HasAge>() {
    public boolean apply(HasAge hasAge) {
        return hasAge.getAge() > 16;
    }
};

List<Person> beerDrinkers = filter(persons, canDrinkBeer);

As remarked by Dave Jarvis, I should have dropped the getter, and he’s right ;-)

Predicate canDrinkBeer = new Predicate() {
     public boolean apply(HasAge hasAge) {
         return hasAge.isOlderThan( 16 );
    }
};

which would lead to better code down the road:

Predicate canDrinkBeer = new Predicate() {
    public boolean apply( HasAge hasAge, HasAge otherAge ) {
        return hasAge.isOlderThan( otherAge );
    }
}

The predicate version is slightly larger, but consists of two parts. Each one is easier to understand. While the loop version gets unreadable fast with new requirements, the functional version can easily be combined,

List beerDrinkers = filter(filter(persons, canDrinkBeer), isMale);
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值