本文分析基于Linux Kernel 1.2.13
原创作品，转载请标明http://blog.csdn.net/yming0221/article/details/7492423
更多请看专栏，地址http://blog.csdn.net/column/details/linux-kernel-net.html
作者：闫明
注：标题中的”（上）“，”（下）“表示分析过程基于数据包的传递方向：”（上）“表示分析是从底层向上分析、”（下）“表示分析是从上向下分析。
上一篇博文中我们从宏观上分析了Linux内核中网络栈的初始化过程，这里我们再从宏观上分析一下一个数据包在各网络层的传递的过程。
我们知道网络的OSI模型和TCP/IP模型层次结构如下：
上文中我们看到了网络栈的层次结构：
我们就从最底层开始追溯一个数据包的传递流程。
1、网络接口层
* 硬件监听物理介质，进行数据的接收，当接收的数据填满了缓冲区，硬件就会产生中断，中断产生后，系统会转向中断服务子程序。
* 在中断服务子程序中，数据会从硬件的缓冲区复制到内核的空间缓冲区，并包装成一个数据结构（sk_buff），然后调用对驱动层的接口函数netif_rx()将数据包发送给链路层。该函数的实现在net/inet/dev.c中，（在整个网络栈实现中dev.c文件的作用重大，它衔接了其下的驱动层和其上的网络层，可以称它为链路层模块的实现）
该函数的实现如下：
/*
* Receive a packet from a device driver and queue it for the upper
* (protocol) levels. It always succeeds. This is the recommended
* interface to use.
* 从设备驱动层接受到的数据发送到协议的
* 上层，该函数实际是一个接口。
*/
void netif_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
static int dropping = 0;
/*
* Any received buffers are un-owned and should be discarded
* when freed. These will be updated later as the frames get
* owners.
*/
skb->sk = NULL;
skb->free = 1;
if(skb->stamp.tv_sec==0)
skb->stamp = xtime;
/*
* Check that we aren't overdoing things.
*/
if (!backlog_size)
dropping = 0;
else if (backlog_size > 300)
dropping = 1;
if (dropping)
{
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_READ);
return;
}
/*
* Add it to the "backlog" queue.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_SKB_CHECK
IS_SKB(skb);
#endif
skb_queue_tail(&backlog,skb);//加入队列backlog
backlog_size++;
/*
* If any packet arrived, mark it for processing after the
* hardware interrupt returns.
*/
mark_bh(NET_BH);//下半部分bottom half技术可以减少中断处理程序的执行时间
return;
}该函数中用到了bootom half技术，该技术的原理是将中断处理程序人为的分为两部分，上半部分是实时性要求较高的任务，后半部分可以稍后完成，这样就可以节省中断程序的处理时间。可整体的提高系统的性能。该技术将会在后续的博文中详细分析。
我们从上一篇分析中知道，在网络栈初始化的时候，已经将NET的下半部分执行函数定义成了net_bh(在socket.c文件中1375行左右)
bh_base[NET_BH].routine= net_bh;//设置NET 下半部分的处理函数为net_bh* 函数net_bh的实现在net/inet/dev.c中
/*
* When we are called the queue is ready to grab, the interrupts are
* on and hardware can interrupt and queue to the receive queue a we
* run with no problems.
* This is run as a bottom half after an interrupt handler that does
* mark_bh(NET_BH);
*/
void net_bh(void *tmp)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
struct packet_type *ptype;
struct packet_type *pt_prev;
unsigned short type;
/*
* Atomically check and mark our BUSY state.
*/
if (set_bit(1, (void*)&in_bh))//标记BUSY状态
return;
/*
* Can we send anything now? We want to clear the
* decks for any more sends that get done as we
* process the input.
*/
dev_transmit();//调用dev_tinit()函数发送数据
/*
* Any data left to process. This may occur because a
* mark_bh() is done after we empty the queue including
* that from the device which does a mark_bh() just after
*/
cli();//防止队列操作错误，需要关中断和开中断
/*
* While the queue is not empty
*/
while((skb=skb_dequeue(&backlog))!=NULL)//出队直到队列为空
{
/*
* We have a packet. Therefore the queue has shrunk
*/
backlog_size--;//队列元素个数减一
sti();
/*
* Bump the pointer to the next structure.
* This assumes that the basic 'skb' pointer points to
* the MAC header, if any (as indicated by its "length"
* field). Take care now!
*/
skb->h.raw = skb->data + skb->dev->hard_header_len;
skb->len -= skb->dev->hard_header_len;
/*
* Fetch the packet protocol ID. This is also quite ugly, as
* it depends on the protocol driver (the interface itself) to
* know what the type is, or where to get it from. The Ethernet
* interfaces fetch the ID from the two bytes in the Ethernet MAC
* header (the h_proto field in struct ethhdr), but other drivers
* may either use the ethernet ID's or extra ones that do not
* clash (eg ETH_P_AX25). We could set this before we queue the
* frame. In fact I may change this when I have time.
*/
type = skb->dev->type_trans(skb, skb->dev);//取出该数据包所属的协议类型
/*
* We got a packet ID. Now loop over the "known protocols"
* table (which is actually a linked list, but this will
* change soon if I get my way- FvK), and forward the packet
* to anyone who wants it.
*
* [FvK didn't get his way but he is right this ought to be
* hashed so we typically get a single hit. The speed cost
* here is minimal but no doubt adds up at the 4,000+ pkts/second
* rate we can hit flat out]
*/
pt_prev = NULL;
for (ptype = ptype_base; ptype != NULL; ptype = ptype->next) //遍历ptype_base所指向的网络协议队列
{
//判断协议号是否匹配
if ((ptype->type == type || ptype->type == htons(ETH_P_ALL)) && (!ptype->dev || ptype->dev==skb->dev))
{
/*
* We already have a match queued. Deliver
* to it and then remember the new match
*/
if(pt_prev)
{
struct sk_buff *skb2;
skb2=skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);//复制数据包结构
/*
* Kick the protocol handler. This should be fast
* and efficient code.
*/
if(skb2)
pt_prev->func(skb2, skb->dev, pt_prev);//调用相应协议的处理函数，
//这里和网络协议的种类有关系
//如IP 协议的处理函数就是ip_rcv
}
/* Remember the current last to do */
pt_prev=ptype;
}
} /* End of protocol list loop */
/*
* Is there a last item to send to ?
*/
if(pt_prev)
pt_prev->func(skb, skb->dev, pt_prev);
/*
* Has an unknown packet has been received ?
*/
else
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_WRITE);
/*
* Again, see if we can transmit anything now.
* [Ought to take this out judging by tests it slows
* us down not speeds us up]
*/
dev_transmit();
cli();
} /* End of queue loop */
/*
* We have emptied the queue
*/
in_bh = 0;//BUSY状态还原
sti();
/*
* One last output flush.
*/
dev_transmit();//清空缓冲区
}* 就以IP数据包为例来说明，那么从链路层向网络层传递时将调用ip_rcv函数。该函数完成本层的处理后会根据IP首部中使用的传输层协议来调用相应协议的处理函数。
UDP对应udp_rcv、TCP对应tcp_rcv、ICMP对应icmp_rcv、IGMP对应igmp_rcv（虽然这里的ICMP,IGMP一般成为网络层协议，但是实际上他们都封装在IP协议里面，作为传输层对待）
这个函数比较复杂，后续会详细分析。这里粘贴一下，让我们对整体了解更清楚
/*
* This function receives all incoming IP datagrams.
*/
int ip_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct device *dev, struct packet_type *pt)
{
struct iphdr *iph = skb->h.iph;
struct sock *raw_sk=NULL;
unsigned char hash;
unsigned char flag = 0;
unsigned char opts_p = 0; /* Set iff the packet has options. */
struct inet_protocol *ipprot;
static struct options opt; /* since we don't use these yet, and they
take up stack space. */
int brd=IS_MYADDR;
int is_frag=0;
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL
int err;
#endif
ip_statistics.IpInReceives++;
/*
* Tag the ip header of this packet so we can find it
*/
skb->ip_hdr = iph;
/*
* Is the datagram acceptable?
*
* 1. Length at least the size of an ip header
* 2. Version of 4
* 3. Checksums correctly. [Speed optimisation for later, skip loopback checksums]
* (4. We ought to check for IP multicast addresses and undefined types.. does this matter ?)
*/
if (skb->len<sizeof(struct iphdr) || iph->ihl<5 || iph->version != 4 ||
skb->len<ntohs(iph->tot_len) || ip_fast_csum((unsigned char *)iph, iph->ihl) !=0)
{
ip_statistics.IpInHdrErrors++;
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_WRITE);
return(0);
}
/*
* See if the firewall wants to dispose of the packet.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL
if ((err=ip_fw_chk(iph,dev,ip_fw_blk_chain,ip_fw_blk_policy, 0))!=1)
{
if(err==-1)
icmp_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, ICMP_PORT_UNREACH, 0, dev);
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_WRITE);
return 0;
}
#endif
/*
* Our transport medium may have padded the buffer out. Now we know it
* is IP we can trim to the true length of the frame.
*/
skb->len=ntohs(iph->tot_len);
/*
* Next analyse the packet for options. Studies show under one packet in
* a thousand have options....
*/
if (iph->ihl != 5)
{ /* Fast path for the typical optionless IP packet. */
memset((char *) &opt, 0, sizeof(opt));
if (do_options(iph, &opt) != 0)
return 0;
opts_p = 1;
}
/*
* Remember if the frame is fragmented.
*/
if(iph->frag_off)
{
if (iph->frag_off & 0x0020)
is_frag|=1;
/*
* Last fragment ?
*/
if (ntohs(iph->frag_off) & 0x1fff)
is_frag|=2;
}
/*
* Do any IP forwarding required. chk_addr() is expensive -- avoid it someday.
*
* This is inefficient. While finding out if it is for us we could also compute
* the routing table entry. This is where the great unified cache theory comes
* in as and when someone implements it
*
* For most hosts over 99% of packets match the first conditional
* and don't go via ip_chk_addr. Note: brd is set to IS_MYADDR at
* function entry.
*/
if ( iph->daddr != skb->dev->pa_addr && (brd = ip_chk_addr(iph->daddr)) == 0)
{
/*
* Don't forward multicast or broadcast frames.
*/
if(skb->pkt_type!=PACKET_HOST || brd==IS_BROADCAST)
{
kfree_skb(skb,FREE_WRITE);
return 0;
}
/*
* The packet is for another target. Forward the frame
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_FORWARD
ip_forward(skb, dev, is_frag);
#else
/* printk("Machine %lx tried to use us as a forwarder to %lx but we have forwarding disabled!\n",
iph->saddr,iph->daddr);*/
ip_statistics.IpInAddrErrors++;
#endif
/*
* The forwarder is inefficient and copies the packet. We
* free the original now.
*/
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_WRITE);
return(0);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST
if(brd==IS_MULTICAST && iph->daddr!=IGMP_ALL_HOSTS && !(dev->flags&IFF_LOOPBACK))
{
/*
* Check it is for one of our groups
*/
struct ip_mc_list *ip_mc=dev->ip_mc_list;
do
{
if(ip_mc==NULL)
{
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_WRITE);
return 0;
}
if(ip_mc->multiaddr==iph->daddr)
break;
ip_mc=ip_mc->next;
}
while(1);
}
#endif
/*
* Account for the packet
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_ACCT
ip_acct_cnt(iph,dev, ip_acct_chain);
#endif
/*
* Reassemble IP fragments.
*/
if(is_frag)
{
/* Defragment. Obtain the complete packet if there is one */
skb=ip_defrag(iph,skb,dev);
if(skb==NULL)
return 0;
skb->dev = dev;
iph=skb->h.iph;
}
/*
* Point into the IP datagram, just past the header.
*/
skb->ip_hdr = iph;
skb->h.raw += iph->ihl*4;
/*
* Deliver to raw sockets. This is fun as to avoid copies we want to make no surplus copies.
*/
hash = iph->protocol & (SOCK_ARRAY_SIZE-1);
/* If there maybe a raw socket we must check - if not we don't care less */
if((raw_sk=raw_prot.sock_array[hash])!=NULL)
{
struct sock *sknext=NULL;
struct sk_buff *skb1;
raw_sk=get_sock_raw(raw_sk, hash, iph->saddr, iph->daddr);
if(raw_sk) /* Any raw sockets */
{
do
{
/* Find the next */
sknext=get_sock_raw(raw_sk->next, hash, iph->saddr, iph->daddr);
if(sknext)
skb1=skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
else
break; /* One pending raw socket left */
if(skb1)
raw_rcv(raw_sk, skb1, dev, iph->saddr,iph->daddr);
raw_sk=sknext;
}
while(raw_sk!=NULL);
/* Here either raw_sk is the last raw socket, or NULL if none */
/* We deliver to the last raw socket AFTER the protocol checks as it avoids a surplus copy */
}
}
/*
* skb->h.raw now points at the protocol beyond the IP header.
*/
hash = iph->protocol & (MAX_INET_PROTOS -1);
for (ipprot = (struct inet_protocol *)inet_protos[hash];ipprot != NULL;ipprot=(struct inet_protocol *)ipprot->next)
{
struct sk_buff *skb2;
if (ipprot->protocol != iph->protocol)
continue;
/*
* See if we need to make a copy of it. This will
* only be set if more than one protocol wants it.
* and then not for the last one. If there is a pending
* raw delivery wait for that
*/
if (ipprot->copy || raw_sk)
{
skb2 = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
if(skb2==NULL)
continue;
}
else
{
skb2 = skb;
}
flag = 1;
/*
* Pass on the datagram to each protocol that wants it,
* based on the datagram protocol. We should really
* check the protocol handler's return values here...
*/
ipprot->handler(skb2, dev, opts_p ? &opt : 0, iph->daddr,
(ntohs(iph->tot_len) - (iph->ihl * 4)),
iph->saddr, 0, ipprot);
}
/*
* All protocols checked.
* If this packet was a broadcast, we may *not* reply to it, since that
* causes (proven, grin) ARP storms and a leakage of memory (i.e. all
* ICMP reply messages get queued up for transmission...)
*/
if(raw_sk!=NULL) /* Shift to last raw user */
raw_rcv(raw_sk, skb, dev, iph->saddr, iph->daddr);
else if (!flag) /* Free and report errors */
{
if (brd != IS_BROADCAST && brd!=IS_MULTICAST)
icmp_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, ICMP_PROT_UNREACH, 0, dev);
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_WRITE);
}
return(0);
}3、传输层
如果在IP数据报的首部标明的是使用TCP传输数据，则在上述函数中会调用tcp_rcv函数。该函数的大体处理流程为：
“所有使用TCP 协议的套接字对应sock 结构都被挂入tcp_prot 全局变量表示的proto 结构之sock_array 数组中，采用以本地端口号为索引的插入方式，所以当tcp_rcv 函数接收到一个数据包，在完成必要的检查和处理后，其将以TCP 协议首部中目的端口号（对于一个接收的数据包而言，其目的端口号就是本地所使用的端口号）为索引，在tcp_prot 对应sock 结构之sock_array 数组中得到正确的sock 结构队列，在辅之以其他条件遍历该队列进行对应sock 结构的查询，在得到匹配的sock 结构后，将数据包挂入该sock 结构中的缓存队列中（由sock 结构中receive_queue 字段指向），从而完成数据包的最终接收。”
该函数的实现也会比较复杂，这是由TCP协议的复杂功能决定的。附代码如下：
/*
* A TCP packet has arrived.
*/
int tcp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct device *dev, struct options *opt,
unsigned long daddr, unsigned short len,
unsigned long saddr, int redo, struct inet_protocol * protocol)
{
struct tcphdr *th;
struct sock *sk;
int syn_ok=0;
if (!skb)
{
printk("IMPOSSIBLE 1\n");
return(0);
}
if (!dev)
{
printk("IMPOSSIBLE 2\n");
return(0);
}
tcp_statistics.TcpInSegs++;
if(skb->pkt_type!=PACKET_HOST)
{
kfree_skb(skb,FREE_READ);
return(0);
}
th = skb->h.th;
/*
* Find the socket.
*/
sk = get_sock(&tcp_prot, th->dest, saddr, th->source, daddr);
/*
* If this socket has got a reset it's to all intents and purposes
* really dead. Count closed sockets as dead.
*
* Note: BSD appears to have a bug here. A 'closed' TCP in BSD
* simply drops data. This seems incorrect as a 'closed' TCP doesn't
* exist so should cause resets as if the port was unreachable.
*/
if (sk!=NULL && (sk->zapped || sk->state==TCP_CLOSE))
sk=NULL;
if (!redo)
{
if (tcp_check(th, len, saddr, daddr ))
{
skb->sk = NULL;
kfree_skb(skb,FREE_READ);
/*
* We don't release the socket because it was
* never marked in use.
*/
return(0);
}
th->seq = ntohl(th->seq);
/* See if we know about the socket. */
if (sk == NULL)
{
/*
* No such TCB. If th->rst is 0 send a reset (checked in tcp_reset)
*/
tcp_reset(daddr, saddr, th, &tcp_prot, opt,dev,skb->ip_hdr->tos,255);
skb->sk = NULL;
/*
* Discard frame
*/
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_READ);
return(0);
}
skb->len = len;
skb->acked = 0;
skb->used = 0;
skb->free = 0;
skb->saddr = daddr;
skb->daddr = saddr;
/* We may need to add it to the backlog here. */
cli();
if (sk->inuse)
{
skb_queue_tail(&sk->back_log, skb);
sti();
return(0);
}
sk->inuse = 1;
sti();
}
else
{
if (sk==NULL)
{
tcp_reset(daddr, saddr, th, &tcp_prot, opt,dev,skb->ip_hdr->tos,255);
skb->sk = NULL;
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_READ);
return(0);
}
}
if (!sk->prot)
{
printk("IMPOSSIBLE 3\n");
return(0);
}
/*
* Charge the memory to the socket.
*/
if (sk->rmem_alloc + skb->mem_len >= sk->rcvbuf)
{
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_READ);
release_sock(sk);
return(0);
}
skb->sk=sk;
sk->rmem_alloc += skb->mem_len;
/*
* This basically follows the flow suggested by RFC793, with the corrections in RFC1122. We
* don't implement precedence and we process URG incorrectly (deliberately so) for BSD bug
* compatibility. We also set up variables more thoroughly [Karn notes in the
* KA9Q code the RFC793 incoming segment rules don't initialise the variables for all paths].
*/
if(sk->state!=TCP_ESTABLISHED) /* Skip this lot for normal flow */
{
/*
* Now deal with unusual cases.
*/
if(sk->state==TCP_LISTEN)
{
if(th->ack) /* These use the socket TOS.. might want to be the received TOS */
tcp_reset(daddr,saddr,th,sk->prot,opt,dev,sk->ip_tos, sk->ip_ttl);
/*
* We don't care for RST, and non SYN are absorbed (old segments)
* Broadcast/multicast SYN isn't allowed. Note - bug if you change the
* netmask on a running connection it can go broadcast. Even Sun's have
* this problem so I'm ignoring it
*/
if(th->rst || !th->syn || th->ack || ip_chk_addr(daddr)!=IS_MYADDR)
{
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_READ);
release_sock(sk);
return 0;
}
/*
* Guess we need to make a new socket up
*/
tcp_conn_request(sk, skb, daddr, saddr, opt, dev, tcp_init_seq());
/*
* Now we have several options: In theory there is nothing else
* in the frame. KA9Q has an option to send data with the syn,
* BSD accepts data with the syn up to the [to be] advertised window
* and Solaris 2.1 gives you a protocol error. For now we just ignore
* it, that fits the spec precisely and avoids incompatibilities. It
* would be nice in future to drop through and process the data.
*/
release_sock(sk);
return 0;
}
/* retransmitted SYN? */
if (sk->state == TCP_SYN_RECV && th->syn && th->seq+1 == sk->acked_seq)
{
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_READ);
release_sock(sk);
return 0;
}
/*
* SYN sent means we have to look for a suitable ack and either reset
* for bad matches or go to connected
*/
if(sk->state==TCP_SYN_SENT)
{
/* Crossed SYN or previous junk segment */
if(th->ack)
{
/* We got an ack, but it's not a good ack */
if(!tcp_ack(sk,th,saddr,len))
{
/* Reset the ack - its an ack from a
different connection [ th->rst is checked in tcp_reset()] */
tcp_statistics.TcpAttemptFails++;
tcp_reset(daddr, saddr, th,
sk->prot, opt,dev,sk->ip_tos,sk->ip_ttl);
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_READ);
release_sock(sk);
return(0);
}
if(th->rst)
return tcp_std_reset(sk,skb);
if(!th->syn)
{
/* A valid ack from a different connection
start. Shouldn't happen but cover it */
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_READ);
release_sock(sk);
return 0;
}
/*
* Ok.. it's good. Set up sequence numbers and
* move to established.
*/
syn_ok=1; /* Don't reset this connection for the syn */
sk->acked_seq=th->seq+1;
sk->fin_seq=th->seq;
tcp_send_ack(sk->sent_seq,sk->acked_seq,sk,th,sk->daddr);
tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_ESTABLISHED);
tcp_options(sk,th);
sk->dummy_th.dest=th->source;
sk->copied_seq = sk->acked_seq;
if(!sk->dead)
{
sk->state_change(sk);
sock_wake_async(sk->socket, 0);
}
if(sk->max_window==0)
{
sk->max_window = 32;
sk->mss = min(sk->max_window, sk->mtu);
}
}
else
{
/* See if SYN's cross. Drop if boring */
if(th->syn && !th->rst)
{
/* Crossed SYN's are fine - but talking to
yourself is right out... */
if(sk->saddr==saddr && sk->daddr==daddr &&
sk->dummy_th.source==th->source &&
sk->dummy_th.dest==th->dest)
{
tcp_statistics.TcpAttemptFails++;
return tcp_std_reset(sk,skb);
}
tcp_set_state(sk,TCP_SYN_RECV);
/*
* FIXME:
* Must send SYN|ACK here
*/
}
/* Discard junk segment */
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_READ);
release_sock(sk);
return 0;
}
/*
* SYN_RECV with data maybe.. drop through
*/
goto rfc_step6;
}
/*
* BSD has a funny hack with TIME_WAIT and fast reuse of a port. There is
* a more complex suggestion for fixing these reuse issues in RFC1644
* but not yet ready for general use. Also see RFC1379.
*/
#define BSD_TIME_WAIT
#ifdef BSD_TIME_WAIT
if (sk->state == TCP_TIME_WAIT && th->syn && sk->dead &&
after(th->seq, sk->acked_seq) && !th->rst)
{
long seq=sk->write_seq;
if(sk->debug)
printk("Doing a BSD time wait\n");
tcp_statistics.TcpEstabResets++;
sk->rmem_alloc -= skb->mem_len;
skb->sk = NULL;
sk->err=ECONNRESET;
tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
sk->shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK;
release_sock(sk);
sk=get_sock(&tcp_prot, th->dest, saddr, th->source, daddr);
if (sk && sk->state==TCP_LISTEN)
{
sk->inuse=1;
skb->sk = sk;
sk->rmem_alloc += skb->mem_len;
tcp_conn_request(sk, skb, daddr, saddr,opt, dev,seq+128000);
release_sock(sk);
return 0;
}
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_READ);
return 0;
}
#endif
}
/*
* We are now in normal data flow (see the step list in the RFC)
* Note most of these are inline now. I'll inline the lot when
* I have time to test it hard and look at what gcc outputs
*/
if(!tcp_sequence(sk,th,len,opt,saddr,dev))
{
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_READ);
release_sock(sk);
return 0;
}
if(th->rst)
return tcp_std_reset(sk,skb);
/*
* !syn_ok is effectively the state test in RFC793.
*/
if(th->syn && !syn_ok)
{
tcp_reset(daddr,saddr,th, &tcp_prot, opt, dev, skb->ip_hdr->tos, 255);
return tcp_std_reset(sk,skb);
}
/*
* Process the ACK
*/
if(th->ack && !tcp_ack(sk,th,saddr,len))
{
/*
* Our three way handshake failed.
*/
if(sk->state==TCP_SYN_RECV)
{
tcp_reset(daddr, saddr, th,sk->prot, opt, dev,sk->ip_tos,sk->ip_ttl);
}
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_READ);
release_sock(sk);
return 0;
}
rfc_step6: /* I'll clean this up later */
/*
* Process urgent data
*/
if(tcp_urg(sk, th, saddr, len))
{
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_READ);
release_sock(sk);
return 0;
}
/*
* Process the encapsulated data
*/
if(tcp_data(skb,sk, saddr, len))
{
kfree_skb(skb, FREE_READ);
release_sock(sk);
return 0;
}
/*
* And done
*/
release_sock(sk);
return 0;
}4、应用层
当用户需要接收数据时，首先根据文件描述符inode得到socket结构和sock结构，然后从sock结构中指向的队列recieve_queue中读取数据包，将数据包COPY到用户空间缓冲区。数据就完整的从硬件中传输到用户空间。这样也完成了一次完整的从下到上的传输。
2947
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
