ciscoRV042对接cisco2951,日志

最新推荐文章于 2021-05-15 07:35:09 发布
最新推荐文章于 2021-05-15 07:35:09 发布
阅读量281 收藏
点赞数
分类专栏： 网络问题 文章标签： 网络
版权声明：本文为博主原创文章，遵循 CC 4.0 BY-SA 版权协议，转载请附上原文出处链接和本声明。
本文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/iteye_17258/article/details/82397044
版权
在2951上的ike策略10无法与RV042的策略匹配，需要手工指定策略20后问题修复：
crypto isakmp policy 10
authentication pre-share
crypto isakmp policy 20
hash md5
authentication pre-share
lifetime 3600
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Aug 7 11:33:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:33:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:34:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:36:09 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:37:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:37:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:37:32 2012 Connection Accepted ICMP type 8 code 0 172.17.73.102->61.161.193.178 on eth1
Aug 7 11:37:33 2012 Connection Accepted ICMP type 8 code 0 172.17.73.102->61.161.193.178 on eth1
Aug 7 11:37:44 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32771->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:37:44 2012 Connection Accepted ICMP type 8 code 0 172.17.73.102->218.60.32.23 on eth1
Aug 7 11:37:49 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32772->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:37:49 2012 Connection Accepted ICMP type 8 code 0 172.17.73.102->218.60.32.23 on eth1
Aug 7 11:37:50 2012 Connection Accepted ICMP type 8 code 0 172.17.73.102->218.60.32.23 on eth1
Aug 7 11:37:51 2012 Connection Accepted ICMP type 8 code 0 172.17.73.102->218.60.32.23 on eth1
[color=darkred]Aug 7 11:38:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:38:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN[/color]
Aug 7 11:40:09 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:40:54 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32773->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:40:59 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32774->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:40:59 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:51356->74.125.71.106:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:40:59 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:51356->74.125.71.106:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:40:59 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:51356->74.125.71.106:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:09 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32776->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:09 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41666->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:09 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41666->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:09 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41666->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:10 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 173.194.72.199:80->172.17.73.102:41667 on eth0
Aug 7 11:41:10 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41668->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:12 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41667->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:12 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41668->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:13 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41670->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:13 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41670->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:13 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41670->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:14 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 173.194.72.199:80->172.17.73.102:41670 on eth0
Aug 7 11:41:20 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32778->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:20 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:38881->173.194.72.120:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:20 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:38881->173.194.72.120:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:28 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41671->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:28 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 173.194.72.199:80->172.17.73.102:41671 on eth0
Aug 7 11:41:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:41:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:41:47 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41670->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:47 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41673->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:47 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41673->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:47 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41674->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:48 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41675->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:48 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41675->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:49 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41676->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:49 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41678->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:41:58 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41679->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:08 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32780->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:09 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37298->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:09 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37298->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:09 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37298->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:12 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37302->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:12 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37300->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:16 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37303->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:17 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37303->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:17 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37302->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:17 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32787->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:17 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37300->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:18 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37301->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:19 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37301->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:21 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32788->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:21 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37304->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:22 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37304->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:22 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37304->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:22 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37304->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:22 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37304->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:24 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37305->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:24 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37305->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:25 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37305->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:27 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:58942->74.113.233.133:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:27 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:58942->74.113.233.133:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:28 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:59443->66.235.133.11:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:28 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:59443->66.235.133.11:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:28 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:59443->66.235.133.11:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:29 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:59443->66.235.133.11:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:29 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37309->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:29 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:37305->64.156.132.150:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:42:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:42:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:44:09 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:45:10 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:51356->74.125.71.106:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:38881->173.194.72.120:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #22: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #22: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #22: starting keying attempt 2 of an unlimited number
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #23: initiating Main Mode to replace #22
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #23: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #23: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:45:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:45:50 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41680->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:45:58 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:41679->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:46:39 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:46:39 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:47:59 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:48:33 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32791->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:48:38 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32792->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 11:48:38 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:56950->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:48:38 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:56950->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:48:38 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:56951->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:48:39 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:56951->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:48:39 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:56952->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:49:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:49:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:50:39 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:51:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:51:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:52:39 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:56951->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:52:39 2012 Connection Accepted TCP 172.17.73.102:56952->173.194.72.199:80 on eth1
Aug 7 11:53:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:53:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:54:39 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:55:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:57:19 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 11:57:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #23: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #23: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #23: starting keying attempt 3 of an unlimited number
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #24: initiating Main Mode to replace #23
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #24: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #24: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:58:39 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 11:59:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:01:09 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:02:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:03:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:03:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:05:09 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:06:29 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:07:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:09:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:09:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:10:29 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #24: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #24: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #24: starting keying attempt 4 of an unlimited number
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #25: initiating Main Mode to replace #24
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #25: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #25: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:11:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:12:59 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:14:19 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:15:39 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:15:39 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:16:59 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:18:19 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:19:39 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:20:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:22:19 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:22:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:23:39 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #25: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #25: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #25: starting keying attempt 5 of an unlimited number
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #26: initiating Main Mode to replace #25
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #26: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #26: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:24:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:26:09 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:27:29 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:28:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:30:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:30:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:31:29 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:32:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:34:09 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:35:29 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:36:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:36:49 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #26: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #26: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #26: starting keying attempt 6 of an unlimited number
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #27: initiating Main Mode to replace #26
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #27: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #27: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:38:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:39:19 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:40:39 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:41:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:43:19 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:43:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:44:39 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:45:59 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:46:56 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 172.17.73.102:32793->202.96.64.68:53 on eth1
Aug 7 12:47:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:47:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:48:39 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:49:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:49:59 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #27: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #27: max number of retransmissions (20) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response) to our first IKE message
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #27: starting keying attempt 7 of an unlimited number
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #28: initiating Main Mode to replace #27
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #28: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #28: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:51:19 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:52:29 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:53:49 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times
Aug 7 12:55:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:55:09 2012 VPN Log packet from 61.161.193.178:500: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Aug 7 12:55:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0): deleting connection
Aug 7 12:55:59 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #28: deleting state (STATE_MAIN_I1)
Aug 7 12:55:59 2012 VPN Log added connection description (g2gips0)
Aug 7 12:55:59 2012 VPN Log listening for IKE messages
Aug 7 12:55:59 2012 VPN Log forgetting secrets
Aug 7 12:55:59 2012 VPN Log loading secrets from '/etc/ipsec.d/ipsec.secrets'
Aug 7 12:55:59 2012 System Log gateway_to_gateway.htm is changed.
[color=red]Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: initiating Main Mode
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Initiator Received Main Mode 2nd packet
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Initiator Received Main Mode 2nd packet
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: You should NOT use insecure IKE algorithms (OAKLEY_DES_CBC)!
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: You should NOT use insecure IKE algorithms (OAKLEY_DES_CBC)!
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator send Main Mode 3rd packet
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator send Main Mode 3rd packet
Aug 7 12:56:53 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: ignoring Vendor ID payload [Cisco-Unity]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: ignoring Vendor ID payload [Cisco-Unity]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: received Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: received Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: ignoring Vendor ID payload [1a6558a465b156e0c441fb9576270297]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: ignoring Vendor ID payload [1a6558a465b156e0c441fb9576270297]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: ignoring Vendor ID payload [XAUTH]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: ignoring Vendor ID payload [XAUTH]
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Initiator Received Main Mode 4th packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Initiator Received Main Mode 4th packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 5th packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 5th packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '61.161.193.178'
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Main Mode Phase 1 SA Established
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Main Mode Phase 1 SA Established
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #29: ISAKMP SA established
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: initiating Quick Mode PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+PFS {using isakmp#29}
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator send Quick Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator send Quick Mode 1st packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: ignoring informational payload, type IPSEC_RESPONDER_LIFETIME
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: ignoring informational payload, type IPSEC_RESPONDER_LIFETIME
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Initiator Received Quick Mode 2nd packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Initiator Received Quick Mode 2nd packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: esp_ealg_id=2-2,esp_ealg_keylen=0, key_len=64,esp_aalg_id=1-1.
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: esp_ealg_id=2-2,esp_ealg_keylen=0, key_len=64,esp_aalg_id=1-1.
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: You should NOT use insecure ESP algorithms [ESP_DES (64)]!
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: You should NOT use insecure ESP algorithms [ESP_DES (64)]!
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Inbound SPI value = 3a2db126
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Inbound SPI value = 3a2db126
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Outbound SPI value = b511d744
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Outbound SPI value = b511d744
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Quick Mode 3rd packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Quick Mode 3rd packet
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Quick Mode Phase 2 SA Established, IPSec Tunnel Connected
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Quick Mode Phase 2 SA Established, IPSec Tunnel Connected
Aug 7 12:56:55 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0) #30: sent QI2, IPsec SA established {ESP=>0xb511d744 <0x3a2db126 [/color]
iteye_17258
关注
  • 0
    点赞
  • 踩
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
专栏目录
Cisco RV180W 路由器设置
Zephyr's Blog
10-11 1万+
Cisco RV180W 路由器设置思科S系列 RV180W Wireless-N 多功能 VPN 千兆路由器1. 将路由器接通电源 表现在 Power 灯不停地闪烁，随后 Wireless 灯也随后亮起来2. 将网线端口线连接至路由器上的 WAN 端口 表现在路由器上的 WAN 灯在不断闪烁3. 在电脑端连接 cisco 网络，进入管理员界面 默认的网络名称为 ciscosb-1 浏览器登陆
Cisco RV325路由器的文件修改
qq_42882717的博客
12-30 683
内容概述： 用Cisco RV325尝试进入文件系统，进行一些修改。 全尸面貌： 二、Web端分析过程： 账号：cisco 密码：...... 首先访问192.168.1.1的web端页面（无中文选项~可恶） 输入用户名与密码后，是如下界面 随便弄一下，添加个静态的路由表 三、远程链接RV325： 目的在于链接上RV325，重新开启web端 但是没有调试接口， 1、先用nmap扫描 2、发现22端口，即SSH端口开放，利用putty链接 但是尝试了很多.
在centos上使用openswan搭建IPSec***
weixin_33757609的博客
03-02 1442
背景：因公司业务逐渐迁移到阿里云上，所以有需求搭建一条从公司内容到阿里云的×××隧道，因环境限制并未有***设备可以使用，所以计划在linux上搭建ipsec***来实现该功能。拓扑图如下：目的：在阿里云服务器172.16.0.11和公司服务器192.168.6.79之间建立一条ipsec ***隧道。实现两端私网网段的互访。其中私网地址分别是：172.16.0.11/16和...
pluto实现分析(7)
weixin_33805992的博客
05-14 581
本文档的Copyleft归yfydz所有，使用GPL发布，可以自由拷贝，转载，转载时请保持文档的完整性，严禁用于任何商业用途。msn: yfydz_no1@hotmail.com来源：http://yfydz.cublog.cn 8. 事件处理 8.1 概述 pluto使用"事件"的方式来定义各种超时，将超时操作作为一个未来将要发生的事件。当进入IKE连接中的各种状态时，...
pfSense book之IKEv2服务器配置示例
weixin_33747129的博客
11-20 4544
移动客户端的服务器配置有几个组件：为×××创建一个证书结构配置IPsec移动客户端设置为客户端连接创建阶段1和阶段2添加IPsec防火墙规则创建×××的用户凭据ipsec连接测试ipsec故障排除ipsec日志说明为×××创建IKEv2证书结构创建一个证书颁发机构如果证书管理器中没有合适的证书颁发机构（CA），那么我们首先创建一个：导航到系统>证书管理，CAS选项卡单击...
基于openswan的ipsec穿越NAT的探讨
weixin_33979745的博客
05-15 1457
1楼 发表于 2008-12-8 14:02 基于openswan的ipsec穿越NAT的环境搭建搭建过程: 1)制作证书 2)在无NAT的情况下搭建×××环境 3)在2)的基础上搭建有NAT时的×××环境 但是现在我出现的问题是ipsec不能穿越NAT,我按上面的1)2)3)详细记录下来，请各位前辈指导! 谢谢！...
CiscoRV180W使用手册1.pdf
12-22
CiscoRV180W使用手册1.pdf
ciscoRV120W设置DMZ访问[收集].pdf
10-11
ciscoRV120W设置DMZ访问[收集].pdf
2019年度优秀安全内容合集
热门推荐
anquanzushiye的博客
01-06 3万+
2019信息源与信息类型占比微信公众号推荐昵称_英语weixin_no标题网址安全祖师爷PowerShell渗透–帝国https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/giBR-rn...
snmpd:last message repeated N time
weixin_33709364的博客
06-26 272
作者：守住每一天网站：www.linuxtone.orgblog: liuyu.blog.51cto.commail: liuyu105@gmail.com参考 老王 博客http://hi.baidu.com/thinkinginlamp/blog/item/0dbf3d6da3b847f3431694fa.html解决日志Jun 8 13:30:49 SERVER las...
Linux问题：last message repeated N times
phphot
06-12 7665
作者：老王偶然发现系统日志/var/log/messages里出现大量错误信息：Jun 8 13:20:49 SERVER snmpd[14281]: Connection from UDP: [192.168.0.178]:9632Jun 8 13:25:07 SERVER last message repeated 7 timesJun 8 13:30:49 SERVER last messa
linux /var/log/messege 清除,linux中/var/log/message出现大量的last message repeated N times
weixin_29447313的博客
05-15 1885
今天在检查服务器是发现messages日志中有很多形如last message repeated N times的提示。如下：Jun 2 19:43:46 server last message repeated 7 timesJun 2 19:44:47 server last message repeated 3 timesJun 2 19:46:17 server last message ...
linux中/var/log/message提示last message repeated N times
七块五的专栏
02-01 1万+
操作系统版本：Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.6 X86_64 巡检的时候发现/var/log/message提示： Feb  1 09:01:21 db last message repeated 10 times Feb  1 09:04:20 db last message repeated 11 times
Configuring Linux ×××s
weixin_34261415的博客
05-15 296
Contents[hide] 1 Sponsors 2 Introduction 3 ××× Guidelines 4 Scenario 4.1 Figure 35-1 Openswan Topolology Diagram 5 Download And Install The Openswan Package 6 How to get Ope...
ubuntu 10.4 使用 openswan 搭建 ipsec 基于RSA认证方式的环境搭建 排错记录
dainiao01的专栏
03-30 9181
附上 虚拟器 加载共享文件 方式 sudo mount -t vboxsf down /mnt/share 其中 虚拟机用的 oracle 的 virtualbox 所以文件系统是  vboxsf   前提 虚拟机安装增强功能 down 是 在虚拟机中的设备--》分配数据空间 查找win上的某个目录 数据空间命名为 down /mnt/share  挂载在 /mnt/share 目录
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

个

红包个数最小为10个

元

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43元 前往充值 >
需支付：10.00元
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付元
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明：

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币，按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载，可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值