Logging in the critical path by sampling

From: Logging Wisdom: How to Log

A common reason for not logging is request heavy processes where you couldn’t possibly do a bunch of logging for every request. Here, many just skip logging entirely and instead resort to reporting aggregates — such as periodic check: users_logged_in=10 with mean_session_time=12min. This is sure useful to see the overall health, but it’s meaningless when it comes to spotting bottleneck in individual requests.

A more powerful method is to sample: add log statements to your every request, but only output a X% sample of them. Each log statement could be wrapped in a shouldILog() type of statement that makes it a no-op unless it will be sampled for the particular request. Given enough requests, this will in time be enough to catch at least one instance of almost every single “type” of request — including those hitting tail latencies.

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值