用Collections.sort方法对list排序有两种方法
第一种是list中的对象实现Comparable接口,如下:
a
b
第二种方法是根据Collections.sort重载方法来实现,例如:
a
b
前者代码结构简单,但是只能根据固定的属性排序,后者灵活,可以临时指定排序项,但是代码不够简洁
择优用之。
第一种是list中的对象实现Comparable接口,如下:
/**
* 根据order对User排序
*/
public class User implements Comparable < User > {
private String name;
private Integer order;
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this .name = name;
}
public Integer getOrder() {
return order;
}
public void setOrder(Integer order) {
this .order = order;
}
public int compareTo(User arg0) {
return this .getOrder().compareTo(arg0.getOrder());
}
}
测试一下:
* 根据order对User排序
*/
public class User implements Comparable < User > {
private String name;
private Integer order;
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this .name = name;
}
public Integer getOrder() {
return order;
}
public void setOrder(Integer order) {
this .order = order;
}
public int compareTo(User arg0) {
return this .getOrder().compareTo(arg0.getOrder());
}
}
public
class
Test{
public static void main(String[] args) {
User user1 = new User();
user1.setName( " a " );
user1.setOrder( 1 );
User user2 = new User();
user2.setName( " b " );
user2.setOrder( 2 );
List < User > list = new ArrayList < User > ();
// 此处add user2再add user1
list.add(user2);
list.add(user1);
Collections.sort(list);
for (User u : list){
System.out.println(u.getName());
}
}
}
输出结果如下
public static void main(String[] args) {
User user1 = new User();
user1.setName( " a " );
user1.setOrder( 1 );
User user2 = new User();
user2.setName( " b " );
user2.setOrder( 2 );
List < User > list = new ArrayList < User > ();
// 此处add user2再add user1
list.add(user2);
list.add(user1);
Collections.sort(list);
for (User u : list){
System.out.println(u.getName());
}
}
}
a
b
第二种方法是根据Collections.sort重载方法来实现,例如:
/**
* 根据order对User排序
*/
public class User { // 此处无需实现Comparable接口
private String name;
private Integer order;
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this .name = name;
}
public Integer getOrder() {
return order;
}
public void setOrder(Integer order) {
this .order = order;
}
}
主类中这样写即可:
* 根据order对User排序
*/
public class User { // 此处无需实现Comparable接口
private String name;
private Integer order;
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this .name = name;
}
public Integer getOrder() {
return order;
}
public void setOrder(Integer order) {
this .order = order;
}
}
public
class
Test{
public static void main(String[] args) {
User user1 = new User();
user1.setName( " a " );
user1.setOrder( 1 );
User user2 = new User();
user2.setName( " b " );
user2.setOrder( 2 );
List < User > list = new ArrayList < User > ();
list.add(user2);
list.add(user1);
Collections.sort(list, new Comparator < User > (){
public int compare(User arg0, User arg1) {
return arg0.getOrder().compareTo(arg1.getOrder());
}
});
for (User u : list){
System.out.println(u.getName());
}
}
}
输出结果如下
public static void main(String[] args) {
User user1 = new User();
user1.setName( " a " );
user1.setOrder( 1 );
User user2 = new User();
user2.setName( " b " );
user2.setOrder( 2 );
List < User > list = new ArrayList < User > ();
list.add(user2);
list.add(user1);
Collections.sort(list, new Comparator < User > (){
public int compare(User arg0, User arg1) {
return arg0.getOrder().compareTo(arg1.getOrder());
}
});
for (User u : list){
System.out.println(u.getName());
}
}
}
a
b
前者代码结构简单,但是只能根据固定的属性排序,后者灵活,可以临时指定排序项,但是代码不够简洁
择优用之。