一、多个for循环,遵循外小内大
stratTime = System.nanoTime();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < 10; j++) {
}
}
endTime = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println("外大内小耗时:"+ (endTime - stratTime));
改为:
stratTime = System.nanoTime();
for (int i = 0; i <10 ; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < 10000000; j++) {
}
}
endTime = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println("外小内大耗时:"+(endTime - stratTime));
消耗时间对比:
外大内小耗时:200192114
外小内大耗时:97995997
原因:
两者的循环次数是一直的,造成性能差异,主要是实例化次数和初始化次数不一样。
二、提取与循环无关的表达式到循环外
stratTime = System.nanoTime();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {
i=i*a*b;
}
endTime = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println("未提取耗时:"+(endTime - stratTime));
改为:
stratTime = System.nanoTime();
c = a*b;
for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {
i=i*c;
}
endTime = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println("已提取耗时:"+(endTime - stratTime));
耗时对比:
未提取耗时:45973050
已提取耗时:1955
三、消除循环终止时的方法调用
stratTime = System.nanoTime();
for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) {
}
endTime = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println("未优化list耗时:"+(endTime - stratTime));
改为:
stratTime = System.nanoTime();
int size = list.size();
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
}
endTime = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println("优化list耗时:"+(endTime - stratTime));
耗时对比:
未优化list耗时:27375
优化list耗时:2444
四、异常捕获
stratTime = System.nanoTime();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {
try {
} catch (Exception e) {
}
}
endTime = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println("在内部捕获异常耗时:"+(endTime - stratTime));
改为:
stratTime = System.nanoTime();
try {
for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {
}
} catch (Exception e) {
}
endTime = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println("在外部捕获异常耗时:"+(endTime - stratTime));
耗时对比:
在内部捕获异常耗时:12150142
在外部捕获异常耗时:1955
五、拆分为多个循环