日期格式化性能比较

public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<LocalDate> localDates= Lists.newArrayList();
        for(long i=0;i<10000000;i++){
            localDates.add(toLocalDate(toDate(RandomUtils.nextLong(0,System.currentTimeMillis()))));
        }

        toString(localDates, new Function<LocalDate, String>() {
            @Override
            public String apply(LocalDate localDate) {
                int month=localDate.getMonthValue();
                int day=localDate.getDayOfMonth();
                return localDate.getYear()+"-"+(month>9?String.valueOf(month):"0"+month)+'-'+(day>9?String.valueOf(day):"0"+day);
            }
        });
        toString(localDates, new Function<LocalDate, String>() {
            @Override
            public String apply(LocalDate localDate) {
                return localDate.format(yyyy_MM_dd);
            }
        });
    }
    private static List<String> toString(List<LocalDate> localDates, Function<LocalDate,String> function){
        long start=System.currentTimeMillis();
        List<String> s=new ArrayList<>(localDates.size());
        for(var localDate:localDates){
            s.add(function.apply(localDate));
        }
        long end=System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("toString:"+(end-start));
        return s;
    }

我在自己的电脑上试了下,用第一种自定义的格式化,时间差不多是900-1100,后面那个官方的大概是1200-1600,中的来说可以快30%-50%.当然,官方的适应性更强