key-value model

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2973041/a-keyvaluepair-in-java

A KeyValuePair in Java

up vote 79 down vote favorite 10

I'm looking for a KeyValuePair class in Java. Since java.util heavily uses interfaces there is no concrete implementation provided, only the Map.Entry interface. Is there some canonical implementation I can import? It is one of those "plumbers programming" classes I hate to implement 100x times. java  key-value share | improve this question asked  Jun 4 '10 at 9:55 maayank 1,550 1 11 18

2   I'd recommend against using a generic KeyValuePair class. Much better to define a domain-specific class with more informative accessors (e.g. getProductId(), getProductPrice()). –   Adamski  Jun 4 '10 at 10:04 12   @Adamski: I disagree. We don't use domain-specific Map or List classes, why should this be any different? A KeyValuePair is just a Map with one entry. –   skaffman  Jun 4 '10 at 10:21 2   @skaffman: Fair point but I think the concept of a generic Pair is more easily open to abuse than passing Collections around. For example, if someone wants to return two values from a method it's tempting to return a Pair<X,Y> but typically this is indicative of an underlying design problem (e.g. Why aren't X and Y unified somehow anyway in the domain model if they're intrinsically related?) –   Adamski  Jun 4 '10 at 10:31 7   @Adamski: Because it's not <X,Y>, it's <Key,Value>. He's not asking for an arbitrary Pair type, he's asking for a KeyValuePair type. –   skaffman  Jun 4 '10 at 10:38 1   Despite this I would much rather pass around a single object instance in my code, potentially with a getKey() method defined; e.g. I prefer: processProduct(Product) to processProduct(KeyValuePair<Integer, Product>) where the Integer is the product ID. I agree that KeyValuePair (i.e. Map.Entry) or even a generic Pair is useful within a method logic but I don't like it to "leak out" as a return type or be supplied as a method parameter; e.g. I never pass around Map.Entry. –   Adamski  Jun 4 '10 at 10:52  add a comment

4 Answers

active oldest votes

up vote 102 down vote accepted	AbstractMap.SimpleEntry is generic and can be useful. share | improve this answer edited Nov 27 '12 at 19:08 Dave Jarvis 12.9k 16 74 161 answered  Jun 4 '10 at 9:59 Eyal Schneider 11.7k 2 18 35
	6   ...or AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry if appropriate. –   karmakaze  Aug 7 '13 at 3:09 1   java.util.AbstractMap.SimpleEntry +1 because in SE. –   Thufir  Sep 2 '13 at 9:45 add a comment

up vote 18 down vote

Android programmers could use BasicNameValuePair share | improve this answer answered  Nov 29 '11 at 16:20 kreker 1,507 12 22

3   That's not just for Android programmers, it's any java program. –   Cody  Dec 13 '11 at 12:45 1   @doctor-oreo yes any java programmer could download jar from hc.apache.org but android has those built in –   kreker  Dec 13 '11 at 21:58  17   Actually for Android users, a good choice is android.util.Pair. –   chhabrakadabra  Apr 4 '12 at 1:43 @GalDude33 why is that? It's added in 5 api level. –   kreker  Jul 16 at 0:05 add a comment

up vote 11 down vote	The Pair class from Commons Lang might help: Pair<String, String> keyValue = new ImmutablePair("key", "value"); Of course, you would need to include commons-lang. share | improve this answer edited Apr 1 '13 at 17:52 answered  Nov 6 '12 at 13:57 remipod 1,378 9 9
	The url is not working –   Peter Fortuin  Mar 31 '13 at 17:57 2   url changes from time to time. I googled Pair Commons Lang" and found it. I removed the link to prevent further downvotes :-( –   remipod  Apr 1 '13 at 17:52 1   android.util.Pair –   Arvin  Jul 18 '13 at 9:02 add a comment

up vote 1 down vote

For android and http requests i use NameValuePair, is from the package org.apache.http