java递归优化,java支持并优化尾递归调用吗?

Say I got a recursive function that is tail-recursive.

System.out.println( sum(Arrays.asList(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)) );

int sum(List integers) {

if (integers.isEmpty())

return 0;

else

return integers.get(0) + sum(integers.subList(1, integers.size()));

}

I wonder if this function sum will grow on stack or will it be changed to a loop (since it is a tail-recursive function)?

I have just read that Scala detects such calls and optimizes it but is this a Scala-only thing or JVM in general?

解决方案

Java supports tail-recursive calls, but AFAIK it doesn't optimize them away. I think it's the Scala compiler that is simply capable of this, not the JVM itself. Check out the @tailrec annotation in Scala to see what more the compiler is capable of :)

But regardless of whether Java/JVM optimizes tail-recursion away, your function would be harder to optimize than necessary.

Look at this:

int sum(List integers) {

return sum(integers, 0);

}

int sum(List integers, int sumSoFar) {

if (integers.isEmpty())

return sumSoFar;

else

return sum(

integers.subList(1, integers.size()),

sumSoFar + integers.get(0)

);

}

See, I've added an overloaded sum with a so-far calculated sum parameter. This way when you recur in the else branch you don't need the actual stack frame any more - you got all you need as function arguments in the recursive call.

In your snippet the stack frame would probably have to exist as long as the recursive call..

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值