linux路由器静态无法转发,静态路由之路由器两种转发模式

最新推荐文章于 2021-05-15 17:12:54 发布

小桃气

最新推荐文章于 2021-05-15 17:12:54 发布

阅读量653

点赞数

文章标签： linux路由器静态无法转发

如上图所示，配置如下：

R1#show run

Building configuration...

Current configuration : 941 bytes

version 12.4

service timestamps debug datetime msec

service timestamps log datetime msec

no service password-encryption

hostname R1

boot-start-marker

boot-end-marker

no aaa new-model

memory-size iomem 5

ip cef

no ip domain lookup

interface Loopback0

ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0

interface Serial0/0

ip address 192.1.12.1 255.255.255.0

serial restart-delay 0

interface Serial0/1

no ip address

shutdown

serial restart-delay 0

interface Serial0/2

no ip address

shutdown

serial restart-delay 0

interface Serial0/3

no ip address

shutdown

serial restart-delay 0

interface FastEthernet1/0

no ip address

shutdown

duplex auto

speed auto

ip http server

no ip http secure-server

ip route 3.3.3.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0/0 5 permanent

control-plane

line con 0

exec-timeout 0 0

logging synchronous

line aux 0

line vty 0 4

end

R2#show run

Building configuration...

Current configuration : 1039 bytes

version 12.4

service timestamps debug datetime msec

service timestamps log datetime msec

no service password-encryption

hostname R2

boot-start-marker

boot-end-marker

no aaa new-model

memory-size iomem 5

ip cef

no ip domain lookup

interface Loopback0

ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0

interface Serial0/0

ip address 192.1.12.2 255.255.255.0

serial restart-delay 0

clock rate 64000

interface Serial0/1

ip address 192.1.23.2 255.255.255.0

serial restart-delay 0

clock rate 64000

interface Serial0/2

no ip address

shutdown

serial restart-delay 0

interface Serial0/3

no ip address

shutdown

serial restart-delay 0

interface FastEthernet1/0

ip address 193.1.23.2 255.255.255.0

duplex auto

speed auto

ip http server

no ip http secure-server

ip route 3.3.3.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet1/0

ip route 3.3.3.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0/1

control-plane

line con 0

exec-timeout 0 0

logging synchronous

line aux 0

line vty 0 4

end

R3#show run

Building configuration...

Current configuration : 948 bytes

version 12.4

service timestamps debug datetime msec

service timestamps log datetime msec

no service password-encryption

hostname R3

boot-start-marker

boot-end-marker

no aaa new-model

memory-size iomem 5

ip cef

no ip domain lookup

interface Loopback0

ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0

interface Serial0/0

no ip address

shutdown

serial restart-delay 0

interface Serial0/1

ip address 192.1.23.3 255.255.255.0

serial restart-delay 0

interface Serial0/2

no ip address

shutdown

serial restart-delay 0

interface Serial0/3

no ip address

shutdown

serial restart-delay 0

interface FastEthernet1/0

ip address 193.1.23.3 255.255.255.0

duplex auto

speed auto

ip http server

no ip http secure-server

ip route 192.1.12.0 255.255.255.0 192.1.23.2

control-plane

line con 0

exec-timeout 0 0

logging synchronous

line aux 0

line vty 0 4

end

此试验为验证R2到R3上双线负载均衡的现象，从而学习的两种转发：进程转发、快速转发

采用进程交换方式转发分组时，将基于每个分组来做出等成本路径上的负载均衡决策；

采用快速交换方式转发分组时，将基于目的地来做出等成本路径上的负载均衡决策。

首先说明，涉及到ip cef (全局支持快速转发)，no ip route-cache(接口下关闭快速转发变成进程转发)

1，我们在R2上配置 no ip cef ，关闭全局快速转发。使R2变成进程转发。

我们ping 3.3.3.3 并开启debug ip packet观察

R2#ping 3.3.3.3

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 3.3.3.3, timeout is 2 seconds:

*Mar 1 01:18:51.651: IP: tableid=0, s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:18:51.651: IP: s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 01:18:51.795: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:18:51.795: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), len 100, rcvd 3

*Mar 1 01:18:51.799: IP: tableid=0, s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:18:51.799: IP: s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 01:18:51.803: IP: s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, encapsulation failed.!

*Mar 1 01:18:53.799: IP: tableid=0, s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:18:53.799: IP: s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 01:18:53.907: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:18:53.907: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), len 100, rcvd 3

*Mar 1 01:18:53.911: IP: tableid=0, s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:18:53.911: IP: s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 01:18:53.915: IP: s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, encapsulation failed.!

一通一断现象，从路径看走193的全不通，因为encapsulation failed. 此原因为我们写静态路由的时候是以出接口为下一跳，从而路由在进程转发时候找到此链路上时，会查找2层RARP相关信息对数据重新封成帧，导致封装失败而ping不通。

※如果我们静态路由下一跳为IP地址，则不会产生这样现象。所以写静态路由时候尽量写下一跳IP地址而不要写出接口。

2，我们查看路由条目详细信息。R2#show ip route 3.3.3.0

Routing entry for 3.3.3.0/24

Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0 (connected)

Routing Descriptor Blocks:

* directly connected, via FastEthernet1/0

Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

directly connected, via Serial0/1

Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

此时关闭快速转发后，每一个包的转发都会跟随着下一跳指针的跳动而走不一样的下一跳F1/0或S0/1，这也是说明上面我们为什么通一个断一个，当指针跳到S0/1时，包可以通，跳到F1/0时，就会不通。

3，我们将静态路由该为下一跳IP地址后，可以看到负载均衡的同时下一跳指针的变化，数据包均通。R2#show ip route 3.3.3.3

Routing entry for 3.3.3.0/24

Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0

Routing Descriptor Blocks:

193.1.23.3

Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

* 192.1.23.3

Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

R2#ping 3.3.3.3

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 3.3.3.3, timeout is 2 seconds:

!!!!!

Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 72/137/236 ms

R2#

*Mar 1 01:41:23.215: IP: tableid=0, s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:41:23.215: IP: s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 01:41:23.355: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:41:23.355: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), len 100, rcvd 3

*Mar 1 01:41:23.359: IP: tableid=0, s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:41:23.359: IP: s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 01:41:23.499: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:41:23.499: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, rcvd 3

*Mar 1 01:41:23.503: IP: tableid=0, s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:41:23.503: IP: s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 01:4

R2#1:23.595: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:41:23.595: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), len 100, rcvd 3

*Mar 1 01:41:23.599: IP: tableid=0, s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:41:23.599: IP: s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 01:41:23.835: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:41:23.835: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, rcvd 3

*Mar 1 01:41:23.839: IP: tableid=0, s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:41:23.839: IP: s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 01:41:23.907: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:41:23.907: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), len 100, rcvd 3

R2#show ip route 3.3.3.3

Routing entry for 3.3.3.0/24

Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0

Routing Descriptor Blocks:

* 193.1.23.3

Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

192.1.23.3

Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

４，然后我们再将R2的ip cef 功能全局打开，即全局快速转发，并开启debug ip packet观察。R2(config)#ip cef

R2(config)#^Z

R2#show ip route 3.3.3.3

Routing entry for 3.3.3.0/24

Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0

Routing Descriptor Blocks:

* 193.1.23.3

Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

192.1.23.3

Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

R2#ping 3.3.3.3

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 3.3.3.3, timeout is 2 seconds:

!!!!!

Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 72/124/172 ms

R2#

*Mar 1 01:43:44.247: IP: tableid=0, s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), routed via FIB

*Mar 1 01:43:44.247: IP: s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 01:43:44.415: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:43:44.415: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, rcvd 3

*Mar 1 01:43:44.419: IP: tableid=0, s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), routed via FIB

*Mar 1 01:43:44.419: IP: s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 01:43:44.559: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:43:44.559: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, rcvd 3

*Mar 1 01:43:44.563: IP: tableid=0, s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), routed via FIB

*Mar 1 01:43:44.563: IP: s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), len 100, sending

R2#*Mar 1 01:43:44.655: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:43:44.655: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, rcvd 3

*Mar 1 01:43:44.659: IP: tableid=0, s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), routed via FIB

*Mar 1 01:43:44.659: IP: s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 01:43:44.727: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:43:44.727: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, rcvd 3

*Mar 1 01:43:44.731: IP: tableid=0, s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), routed via FIB

*Mar 1 01:43:44.735: IP: s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 01:43:44.871: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 01:43:44.871: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEt

R2#hernet1/0), len 100, rcvd 3

此现象观察到快速转发而为实现包的负载均衡，应为基于目的的负载均衡，如我们ping其它地址将会看到负载路径的变化。

5，我们将R2的ip cef全局no掉，使R2进入进程交换，我们分别从R1和R2上ping 3.3.3.3 观察结果。R2#show ip route 3.3.3.3

Routing entry for 3.3.3.0/24

Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0

Routing Descriptor Blocks:

193.1.23.3

Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

* 192.1.23.3

Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

R2#ping 3.3.3.3

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 3.3.3.3, timeout is 2 seconds:

!!!!!

Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 96/196/284 ms

R2#

*Mar 1 00:19:48.607: IP: tableid=0, s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 00:19:48.607: IP: s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 00:19:48.823: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 00:19:48.823: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), len 100, rcvd 3

*Mar 1 00:19:48.827: IP: tableid=0, s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 00:19:48.827: IP: s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 00:19:49.107: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 00:19:49.107: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, rcvd 3

*Mar 1 00:19:49.111: IP: tableid=0, s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 00:19:49.111: IP: s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 00:1

R2#9:49.203: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 00:19:49.203: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), len 100, rcvd 3

*Mar 1 00:19:49.207: IP: tableid=0, s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 00:19:49.207: IP: s=193.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 00:19:49.467: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 00:19:49.467: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=193.1.23.2 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, rcvd 3

*Mar 1 00:19:49.471: IP: tableid=0, s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 00:19:49.471: IP: s=192.1.23.2 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), len 100, sending

*Mar 1 00:19:49.587: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 00:19:49.587: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (Serial0/1), d=192.1.23.2 (Serial0/1), len 100, rcvd 3

R2#show ip route 3.3.3.3

Routing entry for 3.3.3.0/24

Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0

Routing Descriptor Blocks:

* 193.1.23.3

Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

192.1.23.3

Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

此信息可看出R2在进程转发模式下，R2自身发起的ping包按照进程转发负载均衡的。接着我们去R1发起ping包并观察现象。

R2#clear ip route * (清除路由表，这样R2上对R1来的ping包的第一个包会进行进程转发，随后按照cache表进行快速转发，以下信息可以看到R2上就第一个包进行了进程路由寻径的输出。)*Mar 1 00:23:15.899: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=192.1.12.1 (Serial0/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 00:23:15.899: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=192.1.12.1 (Serial0/0), g=192.1.12.1, len 100, forward

R2#

*Mar 1 00:23:16.923: IP: tableid=0, s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=192.1.12.1 (Serial0/0), routed via RIB

*Mar 1 00:23:16.927: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (FastEthernet1/0), d=192.1.12.1 (Serial0/0), g=192.1.12.1, len 100, forward

R2#show ip route 3.3.3.3

Routing entry for 3.3.3.0/24

Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0

Routing Descriptor Blocks:

193.1.23.3

Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

* 192.1.23.3

Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1