html2ps/html2pdf的开发者发起一项调查，考虑创建一个轻量级且简单的布局引擎，以支持最常见的CSS/HTML子集，满足基本的文本格式化和表格布局需求。该引擎将作为默认引擎的替代选项，通过API选择使用。他们邀请用户投票并分享自己最常使用的格式化选项和不常用的CSS/HTML特性，以了解用户需求。
POLL: light-weight layout engine?
Greetings all html2ps/html2pdf users.
All of you know that html2ps is rather resource-consuming at the moment. Of course, we're doing our best, but... I doubt that the wonder would happen and requirements would decrease more that by 5-10%. On the other side, some users do not need the whole range of CSS/HTML - just a simple text formatting / table layout engine.
Thus, an idea of making an alternative light-weight simpler layout engine have appeared. It could support the most widely used subset of CSS/HTML suitable for most applications and used instead the default (current) engine using the API. We would like to know your opinion about this idea.
Do you need the "lite" layout engine?
Which formatting options you need in this case?
Which CSS/HTML formatting options you use rarely (or do not use at all)?
Thank you for your interest.
You may vote and express your opinions at tufat.com html2ps support forum: http://www.tufat.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11632
723
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
