java 返回值void,有人可以解释Java中的void返回类型吗？

The only void return type I have seen has System.out.println statements in a method.

So once the method is called those Strings will be printed.

Couldn't you make the return type string and have the string returned instead of doing void return type?

If the void return type method has other methods in it could you make the return type the value which the method gives which would return the outcome of that method?

When is it that you could only use the void return type?

解决方案

Can someone explain a void return type in Java?

The void type is used to declare that a method does not return a value.

Couldn't you just make the return type String and set the string equal to the parameter to make it show up when the method is called?

Hypothetically "you" (or in this case, the designers of the PrintStream API) could do that, but there is no point in doing it. I am struggling think of a plausible use-case where it would make sense to use the println argument String ... if it was returned as a result.

Bear in mind that the primary the goals of a good API design1 are:

to support the common use-cases well, and

to be easy for programmers to understand.

Methods that return values that either don't make sense or that are rarely (if ever) used are (IMO) poorly designed.

If the void return type method has other methods in it could you make the return type method which would return the outcome of that method?

Well, I guess so. But you've got the same issues as above. If the result is either rarely used or is hard to understand (and therefore hard to use correctly) then it is probably bad design to return it.

When is it that you could only use the void return type?

One case is where you are implementing or overriding a method in an interface or a superclass, and that method is declared with a void return type.

But in isolation, there are no cases where you can only use void. (But there are lots of cases where good design says that it is best to use void!)

1 - There other goals too. Please don't take this out of context ...