mysql5.7lock变化,捉虫日记 | MySQL 5.7.20 try_acquire_lock_impl 异常导致mysql crash

背景

近期线上MySQL 5.7.20集群不定期(多则三周,短则一两天)出现主库mysql crash、触发主从切换问题,堆栈信息如下;

bVcPjkx

从堆栈信息可以明显看出,在调用 try_acquire_lock_impl 时触发的crash。

分析BUG#26502135: MYSQLD SEGFAULTS IN

MDL_CONTEXT::TRY_ACQUIRE_LOCK_IMPL

ANALYSIS:

=========

Server sometimes exited when multiple threads tried to

acquire and release metadata locks simultaneously (for

example, necessary to access a table). The same problem

could have occurred when new objects were registered/

deregistered in Performance Schema.

The problem was caused by a bug in LF_HASH - our lock free

hash implementation which is used by metadata locking

subsystem in 5.7 branch. In 5.5 and 5.6 we only use LF_HASH

in Performance Schema Instrumentation implementation. So

for these versions, the problem was limited to P_S.

The problem was in my_lfind() function, which searches for

the specific hash element by going through the elements

list. During this search it loads information about element

checked such as key pointer and hash value into local

variables. Then it confirms that they are not corrupted by

concurrent delete operation (which will set pointer to 0)

by checking if element is still in the list. The latter

check did not take into account that compiler (and

processor) can reorder reads in such a way that load of key

pointer will happen after it, making result of the check

invalid.

FIX:

====

This patch fixes the problem by ensuring that no such

reordering can take place. This is achieved by using

my_atomic_loadptr() which contains compiler and processor

memory barriers for the check mentioned above and other

similar places.

The default (for non-Windows systems) implementation of

my_atomic*() relies on old __sync intrisics and implements

my_atomic_loadptr() as read-modify operation. To avoid

scalability/performance penalty associated with addition of

my_atomic_loadptr()'s we change the my_atomic*() to use

newer __atomic intrisics when available. This new default

implementation doesn't have such a drawback.

大体含义是:

当多个线程分别同时获取、释放metadata locks时,或者在 Performance Schema 中注册/撤销新的object时,可能会触发该问题,导致 mysql server crash。

该问题是 LF_HASH(Lock-Free Extensible Hash Tables) 的BUG引起的,那么 LF_HASH 用在什么地方呢?在5.5、5.6中只用在 Performance Schema Instrumentation 模块。

在5.7中也用于metadata加锁模块。

问题出在my_lfind() 函数中,该函数针对cursor->prev的判断未考虑CAS,该patch通过使用 my_atomic_loadptr() 解决了该问题:diff --git a/mysys/lf_hash.c b/mysys/lf_hash.c

index dc019b07bd9..3a3f665a4f1 100644

--- a/mysys/lf_hash.c

+++ b/mysys/lf_hash.c

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@

-/* Copyright (c) 2006, 2016, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

+/* Copyright (c) 2006, 2017, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify

it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by

@@ -83,7 +83,8 @@ retry:

do { /* PTR() isn't necessary below, head is a dummy node */

cursor->curr= (LF_SLIST *)(*cursor->prev);

_lf_pin(pins, 1, cursor->curr);

- } while (*cursor->prev != (intptr)cursor->curr && LF_BACKOFF);

+ } while (my_atomic_loadptr((void**)cursor->prev) != cursor->curr &&

+ LF_BACKOFF);

for (;;)

{

if (unlikely(!cursor->curr))

@@ -97,7 +98,7 @@ retry:

cur_hashnr= cursor->curr->hashnr;

cur_key= cursor->curr->key;

cur_keylen= cursor->curr->keylen;

- if (*cursor->prev != (intptr)cursor->curr)

+ if (my_atomic_loadptr((void**)cursor->prev) != cursor->curr)

{

(void)LF_BACKOFF;

goto retry;

解决

查看change log,该问题在5.7.22版本修复的:A server exit could result from simultaneous attempts by multiple threads to register and deregister metadata Performance Schema objects, or to acquire and release metadata locks. (Bug #26502135)

升级内核版本到5.7.29,之后巡检1个月,该问题未再出现,问题解决。

PS:篇幅有限,在后续文章中会单独分析 MDL、LF_HASH 源码,敬请关注。

欢迎关注我的微信公众号【MySQL数据库技术】。

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值