禁止用户使用QQ聊天工具

     这个在windows域环境中利用组策略完全可以实现，但是本人觉得最好在路由器上或者防火墙上给封杀掉，孩子们就没得玩了，下面是今天早上通过ping命令获得的地址和ip对应表，在路由器上用 ACL就可以达到目的，获得的地址贴到下面，ACL语句就不用多说了吧！

Pinging sz.tencent.com [121.14.76.26] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 121.14.76.26: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=51

Reply from 121.14.76.26: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=51

Reply from 121.14.76.26: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=51

Reply from 121.14.76.26: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 121.14.76.26:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 4ms, Maximum = 4ms, Average = 4ms

Pinging sz2.tencent.com [183.60.3.50] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 183.60.3.50: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=51

Reply from 183.60.3.50: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=51

Reply from 183.60.3.50: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=51

Reply from 183.60.3.50: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 183.60.3.50:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 5ms, Average = 5ms

Pinging sz3.tencent.com [112.95.241.152] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 112.95.241.152: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=46

Reply from 112.95.241.152: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=46

Reply from 112.95.241.152: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=46

Reply from 112.95.241.152: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=46

Ping statistics for 112.95.241.152:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 87ms, Maximum = 109ms, Average = 92ms

Pinging sz4.tencent.com [119.147.13.226] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 119.147.13.226: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=51

Reply from 119.147.13.226: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=51

Reply from 119.147.13.226: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=51

Reply from 119.147.13.226: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 119.147.13.226:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 18ms, Average = 6ms

Pinging sz5.tencent.com [121.14.75.60] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 121.14.75.60: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=51

Reply from 121.14.75.60: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=51

Reply from 121.14.75.60: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=51

Reply from 121.14.75.60: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 121.14.75.60:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 3ms, Average = 2ms

Pinging sz6.tencent.com [112.90.140.43] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 112.90.140.43: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=47

Reply from 112.90.140.43: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=47

Reply from 112.90.140.43: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=47

Reply from 112.90.140.43: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 112.90.140.43:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 93ms, Maximum = 93ms, Average = 93ms

Pinging sz7.tencent.com [121.14.80.224] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 121.14.80.224: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=51

Reply from 121.14.80.224: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=51

Reply from 121.14.80.224: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=51

Reply from 121.14.80.224: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 121.14.80.224:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 7ms, Average = 3ms

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/networking/archive/2011/06/20/3669308.html