文章探讨了嵌入式设备软件开发中购买现成RTOS与自研之间的抉择。商业RTOS提供即用型解决方案，消除了内部开发的高成本。然而，对于未充分理解内部RTOS生命周期成本的公司而言，可能会陷入软件开发的高昂费用中。在商业Linux与自研Linux之间，前者在成本和复杂性上展现出优势。
摘要：
Companies that haven't clearly understood the high life-cycle costs of in-house RTOS development typically find themselves victims of the "software money pit." But in the buy-versus-make RTOS decision, commercial Linux clearly provides cost and complexity advantages versus the do-it-yourself Linux alternative.rnFor the past 25 years, engineering organizations developing software for embedded devices have become embroiled in the buy-versus-build decision for Real-Time Operating Systems (RTOSs). At the core of the debate is the emergence of commercial RTOSs, providing a complete system off-the-shelf and eliminating the need to write an RTOS system in-house.
展开
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
