参考文章:分页写法小结
推荐使用row_number over()方法,或2012以上使用offset
PageSize = 30 PageNumber = 201 方法一:(最常用的分页代码, top / not in) select top 30 UserId from UserInfo where UserId not in (select top 6000 UserId from UserInfo order by UserId) order by UserId 备注: 注意前后的order by 一致 方法二:(not exists, not in 的另一种写法而已) select top 30 * from UserLog where not exists (select 1 from (select top 6000 LogId from UserLog order by LogId) a where a.LogId = UserLog.LogId) order by LogId 备注:EXISTS用于检查子查询是否至少会返回一行数据,该子查询实际上并不返回任何数据,而是返回值True或False。此处的 select 1 from 也可以是select 2 from,select LogId from, select * from 等等,不影响查询。而且select 1 效率最高,不用查字典表。效率值比较:1 > anycol > * 方法三:(top / max, 局限于使用可比较列排序的时候) select top 30 * from UserLog where LogId > (select max(LogId) from (select top 6000 LogId from UserLog order by LogId) a ) order by LogId 备注:这里max()函数也可以用于文本列,文本列的比较会根据字母顺序排列,数字 < 字母(无视大小写) < 中文字符 方法四:(row_number() over (order by LogId)) select top 30 * from ( select row_number() over (order by LogId) as rownumber,* from UserLog)awhere rownumber > 6000 order by LogId select * from (select row_number()over(order by LogId) as rownumber,* from UserLog)awhere rownumber > 6000 and rownumber < 6030 order by LogId select * from (select row_number()over(order by LogId) as rownumber,* from UserLog)awhere rownumber between 6000 and 6030 order by LogId select *from ( select row_number()over(order by tempColumn)rownumber,* from (select top 6030 tempColumn=0,* from UserLog where 1=1 order by LogId)a)bwhere rownumber>6000
今天无聊和朋友讨论分页,发现网上好多都是错的。网上经常查到的那个Top Not in 或者Max 大部分都不实用,很多都忽略了Order和性能问题。为此上网查了查,顺带把2000和2012版本的也补上了。
先说说网上常见SQL的错误或者说局限问题
1
2
3
4
5
|
select
top
10 *
from
table1
where
id
not
in
(
select
top
开始的位置 id
from
table1)
|
这样的确是可以取到分页数据,但是这是默认排序的,如果要按其中一列排序呢?那order by 加在哪里呢?里外都加,显然不行,外面的Order不起作用,只能嵌套,Oh my god,编程三个Select了,这效率。
为了好用效率高,总体思路还是老老实实的用RowNumber解决,但是SQL2000没有RowNumber,其实我们可以通过临时表自增列搞定,不多说,上例子。
SQL 2000 用临时表解决,通过在临时表中增加自增列解决RowNumber。
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
|
DECLARE
@Start
INT
DECLARE
@
End
INT
SELECT
@Start = 14000,@
End
= 14050
CREATE
TABLE
#employees (RowNumber
INT
IDENTITY(1,1),
LastName
VARCHAR
(100),FirstName
VARCHAR
(100),
EmailAddress
VARCHAR
(100))
INSERT
INTO
#employees (LastName, FirstName, EmailAddress)
SELECT
LastName, FirstName, EmailAddress
FROM
Employee
ORDER
BY
LastName, FirstName, EmailAddress
SELECT
LastName, FirstName, EmailAddress
FROM
#employees
WHERE
RowNumber > @Start
AND
RowNumber <= @
End
DROP
TABLE
#employees
GO
|
SQL 2005/2008 由于支持了Row_Number于是通过派生表的方式解决(两个嵌套)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
|
DECLARE
@Start
INT
DECLARE
@
End
INT
SELECT
@Start = 14000,@
End
= 14050
SELECT
LastName, FirstName, EmailAddress
FROM
(
SELECT
LastName, FirstName, EmailAddress,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (
ORDER
BY
LastName, FirstName, EmailAddress)
AS
RowNumber
FROM
Employee) EmployeePage
WHERE
RowNumber > @Start
AND
RowNumber <= @
End
ORDER
BY
LastName, FirstName, EmailAddress
GO
|
SQL 2005/2008 或者用CTE的方式实现,和派生表一样,就是好看点,执行计划都一样。
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
|
DECLARE
@Start
INT
DECLARE
@
End
INT
SELECT
@Start = 14000,@
End
= 14050;
WITH
EmployeePage
AS
(
SELECT
LastName, FirstName, EmailAddress,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (
ORDER
BY
LastName, FirstName, EmailAddress)
AS
RowNumber
FROM
Employee)
SELECT
LastName, FirstName, EmailAddress
FROM
EmployeePage
WHERE
RowNumber > @Start
AND
RowNumber <= @
End
ORDER
BY
LastName, FirstName, EmailAddress
GO
|
ROW_NUMBER 比较好用的办法
--(1)在ROW_NUMBER的同时用COUNT计算总行数 declare @page_no int declare @page_size int set @page_no = 2 set @page_size = 10 ;WITH tmp AS ( select *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(order by ID) num, COUNT(*) OVER() total from split_pages ) select ID, Name from tmp where num BETWEEN (@page_size*(@page_no-1)+1) AND @page_size*@page_no order by num --(2)仅使用ROW_NUMBER计算总行数,IO最少 declare @page_no int declare @page_size int set @page_no = 2 set @page_size = 10 ;with tmp as ( select *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(order by ID) num, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(order by ID desc) num_desc from split_pages ) select ID, Name, num_desc + num -1 as total from tmp where num BETWEEN (@page_size*(@page_no-1)+1) AND @page_size*@page_no order by num
SQL SERVER 2012 比较给力支持了OFFSET,于是一个Select结束战斗
1
2
3
4
5
|
SELECT
LastName, FirstName, EmailAddress
FROM
Employee
ORDER
BY
LastName, FirstName, EmailAddress
OFFSET 14000
ROWS
FETCH
NEXT
50
ROWS
ONLY
;
|
最后说下,根据老外的文章,在2012里,如果前面加上TOP(50),那么执行计划就会少读很多行数据(读的精准了),提高性能。但是鉴于本人手头没2012也无法测试。至少在2008R2上加不加TOP执行计划都一样。
转自:https://www.cnblogs.com/ebread/p/SQLServer.html