gap lock/next-key lock浅析Basic-Paxos协议日志同步应用

最新推荐文章于 2024-09-25 09:21:39 发布

weixin_30621711

最新推荐文章于 2024-09-25 09:21:39 发布

阅读量138

点赞数

文章标签：数据库

原文链接：http://www.cnblogs.com/zengkefu/p/5720883.html

版权

http://www.cnblogs.com/renolei/p/4673842.html

当InnoDB在判断行锁是否冲突的时候, 除了最基本的IS/IX/S/X锁的冲突判断意外, InnoDB还将锁细分为如下几种子类型:

record lock (RK)

记录锁, 仅仅锁住索引记录的一行
gap lock (GK)

区间锁, 仅仅锁住一个区间(开区间)
insert intention lock (IK)

意向插入锁
next key lock (NK)

record lock + gap lock, 半开半闭区间, 且下界开, 上界闭

以下锁兼容矩阵:

request与granted之间的兼容矩阵:

         | Type of active  |
 Request |  lock (granted) |
  lock   | RK   GK  IK  NK |
---------+-----------------+
  RK     |  0   1 1 0 | GK | 1 1 1 1 | IK | 1 0 1 0 | NK | 0 1 1 0 |

下面构造集中场景简单描述下record lock/gap lock/next-key lock

Table schema

CREATE TABLE `reno` (
    `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `name` varchar(10) DEFAULT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=1 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8

构造数据

insert into reno select 5, 'aa'; insert into reno select 7, 'bb'; insert into reno select 9, 'cc'; insert into reno select 18, 'dd'; insert into reno select 23, 'ee'; insert into reno select 30, 'ff'; insert into reno select 40, 'gg'; insert into reno select 45, 'hh'; insert into reno select 99, 'ii';

查看结果

select * from reno;
+----+------+
| id | name |
+----+------+
|  5 | aa   |
|  7 | bb   |
|  9 | cc   |
| 18 | dd   |
| 23 | ee | | 30 | ff | | 40 | gg | | 45 | hh | | 99 | ii | +----+------+ 9 rows in set (0.00 sec)

查看tx_isolation

SELECT @@GLOBAL.tx_isolation, @@tx_isolation;
+-----------------------+----------------+
| @@GLOBAL.tx_isolation | @@tx_isolation |
+-----------------------+----------------+
| READ-COMMITTED        | READ-COMMITTED |
+-----------------------+----------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)

next-key lock只有在repeatable-read级别下才有意义, 防止出现幻读

设置tx_isolation级别为REPEATABLE-READ级别:

SET @@GLOBAL.tx_isolation = 'REPEATABLE-READ';
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

SET @@SESSION.tx_isolation = 'REPEATABLE-READ'; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) SELECT @@GLOBAL.tx_isolation, @@tx_isolation; +-----------------------+-----------------+ | @@GLOBAL.tx_isolation | @@tx_isolation | +-----------------------+-----------------+ | REPEATABLE-READ | REPEATABLE-READ | +-----------------------+-----------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)

case 1:

sesion 1	sesion 2	sesion 2 insert status
start transaction;
select * from reno where id = 9 for update;
	start transaction;
	insert into reno select 8,'jj';	ok
	insert into reno select 10,'kk';	ok
	insert into reno select 3,'ll';	ok
	insert into reno select 111,'mm';	ok
	rollback
rollback

加record lock, id = 9

case 2:

sesion 1	sesion 2	sesion 2 insert status
start transaction;
select * from reno where id = 15 for update;
	start transaction;
	insert into reno select 8, 'jj';	ok
	insert into reno select 10, 'kk';	block
	insert into reno select 16, 'll';	block
	insert into reno select 19, 'mm';	ok
	rollback
rollback

加next-key lock, (9, 18]

innodb lock info:

------------
TRANSACTIONS
------------
Trx id counter 2990040255 Purge done for trx's n:o < 2990040253 undo n:o < 0 state: running but idle History list length 323 LIST OF TRANSACTIONS FOR EACH SESSION: ---TRANSACTION 0, not started MySQL thread id 38753, OS thread handle 0x7f377c68f700, query id 140937 localhost root init show engine innodb status ---TRANSACTION 0, not started MySQL thread id 9, OS thread handle 0x7f370817d700, query id 140906 127.0.0.1 root cleaning up ---TRANSACTION 2990040254, ACTIVE 8 sec inserting mysql tables in use 1, locked 1 LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s) MySQL thread id 38773, OS thread handle 0x7f377c60e700, query id 140924 localhost root executing insert into reno select 10, 'kk' ------- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 8 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED: RECORD LOCKS space id 64257 page no 3 n bits 80 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`reno` trx id 2990040254 lock_mode X locks gap before rec insert intention waiting Record lock, heap no 5 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 4; hex 80000012; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 0000b238648b; asc 8d ;; 2: len 7; hex d70001c00c0110; asc ;; 3: len 2; hex 6464; asc dd;; ------------------ ---TRANSACTION 2990040253, ACTIVE 17 sec 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s) MySQL thread id 38758, OS thread handle 0x7f370807b700, query id 140919 localhost root cleaning up

从上面的trx lock信息里看到此时等待的锁是: lock_mode X locks gap before rec

case 3:

sesion 1	sesion 2	sesion 2 insert status
start transaction;
select * from reno where id = 200 for update;
	start transaction;
	insert into reno select 1, 'jj';	ok
	insert into reno select 88, 'kk';	ok
	insert into reno select 100, 'll';	block
	insert into reno select 500, 'mm';	block
	rollback
rollback

加next-key lock, (99, ~)

innodb lock info:

------------
TRANSACTIONS
------------
Trx id counter 2990040257 Purge done for trx's n:o < 2990040253 undo n:o < 0 state: running but idle History list length 323 LIST OF TRANSACTIONS FOR EACH SESSION: ---TRANSACTION 0, not started MySQL thread id 38753, OS thread handle 0x7f377c68f700, query id 141561 localhost root init show engine innodb status ---TRANSACTION 0, not started MySQL thread id 9, OS thread handle 0x7f370817d700, query id 141535 127.0.0.1 root cleaning up ---TRANSACTION 2990040256, ACTIVE 137 sec inserting mysql tables in use 1, locked 1 LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 2 row lock(s) MySQL thread id 38773, OS thread handle 0x7f377c60e700, query id 141548 localhost root executing insert into reno select 500, 'kk' ------- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 10 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED: RECORD LOCKS space id 64257 page no 3 n bits 80 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`reno` trx id 2990040256 lock_mode X insert intention waiting Record lock, heap no 1 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 1; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 8; hex 73757072656d756d; asc supremum;; ------------------ ---TRANSACTION 2990040255, ACTIVE 153 sec 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s) MySQL thread id 38758, OS thread handle 0x7f370807b700, query id 141432 localhost root cleaning up

从上面的trx lock信息里看到此时等待的锁是: lock_mode X insert intention waiting

简单总结下:

在case 1中, 实际上加的next-key lock是(9,9], 也就是id=9这一条记录被lock住, 其他所有的插入都没有关系.
在case 2中, 因为id=15记录不存在, 且记录中上下两个边界是id=9, id=18, 因此加的next-key lock是(9, 18], 在这个区间内插入的数据都会被block, 此区间外的数据写入则不受影响.
在case 3中, id=200的记录不存在, 并且比表中所有的记录都大, 因此innodb则认为next-key lock是(99, ~), 任何大于99的id记录插入都会被block, 小于99的id记录写入则不受影响.